Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. Eugene H. Mathison, by his counsel of record, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 raising concerns as to whether his conviction and sentence for both money laundering and fraud is valid under the holding of United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 170 L.Ed.2d 912 (2008). Doc. 1. Th

192 Wis.2d 768 (1995) 531 N.W.2d 585 Greg SCHAEFER, Susie Smith, Colleen Mathison, Peggy Gundersen, Stuart Schaefer and Bridget Schaefer, as children of the deceased, Donald W. Schaefer and Marilyn T. Schaefer, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. No. 92-2769. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Or

SUNDBY, J. (dissenting). Wisconsin's wrongful death statute, § 895.04, STATS., "has for its purpose the compensation of the survivors for the pecuniary bene*392fits which they would have derived from the earning power of the deceased if he had lived." Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., 13 Wis. 2d 491, 497, 109 N.W.2d 131, 135 (1961). The way to anal

August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA

Benham, Chief Justice. This appeal1 follows the Court of Appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s denial of A.B.C. Drug Company’s (“ABC”) motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. A.B.C. Drug Co. v. Monroe, 214 Ga. App. 136 (447 SE2d 315) (1994). The evidence presented at trial indicated that plaintiff Marilyn Keaton entered the ABC store to purchase laundry

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge. This case involves competing breach of contract claims that were asserted after *1123Defendant Hartwig, Inc., repossessed a machine shop lathe it sold to Plaintiff Patriot Manufacturing LLC. Hartwig has filed a motion for summary judgment on several grounds. Most prominently, Hart-wig argues

467 S.E.2d 558 (1996) 266 Ga. 385 KEATON v. A.B.C. DRUG COMPANY d/b/a Pic N' Save Drug Co. No. S95G1911. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 11, 1996. *559 Charles B. Rice, Homerville, Delman L. Minchew, Waycross, Thomas C. Chambers, *560 III, Chambers, Rice & Rogers, H

WOLF, D.J. *339I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Janssen Biotech, Inc. ("Janssen") alleges that defendants Celltrion Healthcare, Co., Ltd. and Celltrion, Inc. (together, "Celltrion"), and Hospira, Inc. ("Hospira") have infringed U.S. Patent

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C

*284 LINDER, J. This is a direct appeal from a decision of the Oregon Tax Court Regular Division (the Tax Court) setting aside an Opinion and Order issued by the Director of the Department of Revenue (the department). ORS 305.445. The chief issue on appeal is whether either Comcast’s cable television serv

The question before the Court is whether a deed which contained a mistake in the description of the property conveyed and was later altered after execution to correct the mistake by someone other than the grantor or grantee was valid to pass title to the grantee. We hold that the altered deed was valid to pass title and affirm the trial court's judgment. George W. Kelley, plaintiff-appellee, filed a complaint seeking a sale for division of the following tracts of land:

282 October 2, 2014 No. 65 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COMCAST CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent. (TC 4909; SC S05976

OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In these consolidated appeals, we review the summary judgments granted to several hundred plaintiffs on their breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the attorney and law firm that represented them in their personal-injury claims arising from their use of diet drugs. The law firm screened tens of thousands of clients for eligibility to opt out of a class-action settleme

403 F.Supp.2d 721 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Angela JOHNSON, Defendant. No. CR 01-3046-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. December 16, 2005. *722 *723 *724 *725

OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti