Cases

Chief Justice TOAL. I respectfully dissent. As I see it, there are three problems with the majority’s interpretation of the definition of “health care” found in section 44-66-20(1) and applied in section 44-66-30(A).5 Section 44-66-20(1) defines health care as: a procedure to diagnose or treat a human disease, ailment, defect, abnormality, or complaint,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 195 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 196 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

631 S.E.2d 435 (2006) 279 Ga. App. 410 McLAIN et al. v. MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC. No. A06A0923. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 15, 2006. *436 Delong, Caldwell & Bridgers, Charles R. Bridgers, Steven W. Saccoccia, Atlanta, for appellants. Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, Richard N. Sheinis, Wil

[Cite as Covenant Dove Holding Co., L.L.C. v. Mariner Health Care, Inc., 2013-Ohio-3824.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO COVENANT DOVE HOLDING : APPEAL NO. C-120878 COMPANY, LLC, COVENANT DOVE, TRIAL NO. A-0805955 LLC, ARK HOLDING, INC., ARK REAL : ESTATE, LLC, ARK MISSISSIPPI

SAUNDERS, Judge. LThis appeal arises from a slip and fall case where Plaintiff fell on Defendant’s premises. Plaintiff pursued a suit against Defendant and was granted Partial Summary Judgment regarding Defendant’s liability based on Defendant’s Admissions. Defendant had previously filed a Motion to Withdraw and Amend these admissions but its motion was denied. It is from this denial and the granting of Plaintiffs Motion f

303 B.R. 42 (2003) In re MARINER POST-ACUTE NETWORK, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and affiliates, Debtors. In re Mariner Health Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and affiliates, Debtors. Arthur W. Stratton, Jr., M.D., David N. Hansen, Paul J. Diaz, and Douglas Stone, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. Mariner Health Care, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. Bankruptcy Nos. 00-00113

COOKS, Judge. |2Both the employer and worker assert various errors in the judgment rendered by the Office of Workers’ Compensation following a work accident involving the Claimant. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 30, 2010, the Claimant, Rhonda Timberlake, alleged she sustained a left wrist and forearm injury while in the course and scope of her employment as a registered nurse wi

Opinion issued July 1, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, dissenting. hi disagree with the majority’s opinion. I would affirm the grant of partial summary judgment giving immunity to Cabrini for summarily suspending Granger, for striking Granger’s claims of defamation and fraud, and would reverse the failure of the trial court to grant immunity to Cabrini for its actions after Granger’s summary suspension. Immunity to Cabri

*956 OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Central States and Guarantee Trust both issued insurance coverage for the same claims. Central States’ contract says that it will pay only if Guarantee Trust does not. Guarantee Trust’s contract insists that it will pay only if Central States doe

SAUFLEY, C.J. [¶ 1] In this appeal from the denial of a motion to attach, we are asked to decide whether, pursuant to the Maine Overhead High-voltage Line Safety Act, 35-A M.R.S. §§ 751-761 (2012), Central Maine Power Company, as the owner of an overhead high-voltage power line, may be entitled to be fully indemnified by Devereux Marine, Inc., for damages that CMP paid to comp

WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. By interlocutory appeal, Central Insurers of Grenada, Inc., challenges the Warren County Circuit Court's denial of its motion to dismiss William Greenwood's complaint against it for insufficient service of process. Finding error in the trial court's determination that the Mississippi Commissioner of Insurance was authorized to accept service

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge *688I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORYThis case is a putative class action against Defendant Group Health Incorporated ("Group Health") brought by Plaintiff Steven Plavin, alleging unjust enrichment and violations of New York's General Business Law and Insurance Law based on Group Health

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0069p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DWAN BRAY and AARON BRAY, individually and as │ parents, natu

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE No. 22-55908 FUND, INC., a Wyoming Not-for- Profit Corporation; JEFFREY D.C. No. FUENTES; SANDRA GARCIA; 2:21-cv-08688- HOVHANNES SAPONGHIAN; DSF-PVC NORMA BRAMBILA; CALIFORNIA EDUCATORS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALBERTO CA

267 B.R. 46 (2001) In re MARINER POST-ACUTE NETWORK, INC., and affiliates, Debtors. NovaCare Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc., Grancare, Inc.; American-Cal Medical Services, Inc.; AMS Properties, Inc.; Clintonaire Nursing Home, Inc.; Crestmont Health Center, Inc.; EH Acquisition Corp. III; Frenchtown Nursing Home, Inc.; GCI Health Care Centers, Inc.; Heritage Nursing Home, Inc.; Middlebelt-Hope Nursing Home, Inc.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG. D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: Appellant Health Communications, Inc. (HCI), is a corporation chartered by and located in the District of Columbia, from which it operates a program to train servers and sellers of alcohol in order to prevent alcohol abuse. Appellee Mariner Corporation is a hotel man

Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 5, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00915-CV JAMES R. SNELL, Appellant V. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CONNECTIONS, INC., UHS OF TIMBERLAWN, INC., UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., AND HEATHER CAWTHON, Appellees

PER CURIAM. We have for review Lowry v. Central Leasing Management, Inc., 33 Fla. L. Weekly D1241, — So.3d-, 2008 WL 1930055 (Fla. 1st DCA May 5, 2008), in which the First District Court of Appeal cited as authority its decision in Murray v. Manners Health/ACE USA, 946 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), quashed, 994 So.2d 1051 (Fla.2008). See also Lowry v. Central Leasing Management, Inc., 98

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-759 (Filed: 11 June 2021*) *************************************** LOGISTICS HEALTH, INC., * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Post-award bid protest; technical evaluation;