Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mark A. Sorensen and Karen A. Sorensen”
Opinion CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: T1 This case involves a dispute over whether a homeowner's insurance policy excludes coverage for an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) accident that occurred in a residential subdivision,. - American National Property and Casualty Company (American National) appeals the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of the passenger in the ATV accident, Stephen Dane Olsen. We affirm. <
Sorensen v. City of Aurorapublic domain
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. On February 23, 1990, plaintiff-appellant Mary J. Sorensen (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint with the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against defendant-ap-pellee City of Aurora (“City”) and others alleging that defendants had violated Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in terminating her employment as a fire dispatcher. The City filed a motion for su
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-1362 Filed October 28, 2015 IN THE INTEREST OF J.G. and Z.F., Minor Children, A.F., Mother, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Hancock County, Karen Kaufman Salic, District Associate Judge. A mother appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental
Jahr v. Casebeerpublic domain
83 Cal.Rptr.2d 172 (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1250 Karen Keating JAHR, as County Counsel, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. George CASEBEER et al. Defendants and Appellants. No. C028749. Court of Appeal, Third District. February 25, 1999. As Modified March 26, 1999. Review Denied May 12, 1999.[*]
MJS and Associates, L.L.C., a Texas Limited Liability Corporation v. Judy Master, RN and Matthew Masterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM
69 B.R. 112 (1986) In re PACIFIC EXPRESS, INC., a California corporation, Debtor. In re PACIFIC EXPRESS HOLDING, INC., a California corporation, Debtor. The UNSECURED CREDITORS' COMMITTEES OF PACIFIC EXPRESS, INC., AND PACIFIC EXPRESS HOLDING, INC., etc., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. PIONEER COMMERCIAL FUNDING CORPORATION, etc., Defendants/Appellants. BAP Nos. EC 86-1024 MoVE, EC 86-1215 MoVE, Bankruptcy Nos. 2-84-00394-
984 F.2d 349 60 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1147,60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,991,36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1293Mary J. SORENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF AURORA, Defendant-Appellee,John Speed, in his official and individual capacity, MarkWildey, in his official and individual capacity,Radford Moore, in his official andindividual capacity, Defendants. No. 91-1348. Un
State v. Warrackpublic domain
Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals 604 21 NEBRASKA APPELLATE REPORTS considered on appeal. Butler County Dairy v. Butler County, 285 Neb. 408, 827 N.W.2d 267 (2013). We therefore decline to address this issue. CONCLUSION We conclude that Cameron and Amanda failed to timely appeal from the orders denying the motions to transfer the cases to tribal court. As such, this court is without jurisdic- tion to address Cameron and Amanda’s argument that the juvenil
Korte v. MEAD JOHNSON & CO.public domain
824 F.Supp.2d 877 (2010) Patrick KORTE and Michelle L. Korte, Individually and as Parents of D.J.K., Plaintiffs, v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, A Delaware Corporation, d/b/a Mead Johnson Nutritionals and Mead Johnson Nutrition Group, Defendants. No. 4:09-cv-00063-JAJ-CFB. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 30, 2010.
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
Karin White v. City of Pasadenapublic domain
OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: After her first termination from the City of Pasadena Police Department and subsequent reinstatement, Karin White brought a lawsuit in state court claiming that she had been discriminated against and harassed by the City due to its perception that she had a disability. After her second termination, she reiterated her discrim
Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.public domain
155 Wis.2d 737 (1990) 456 N.W.2d 570 Thomas S. JUST and Lisa P. Just, Shirley M. Bosch, Roger Dosemegan, John Walterman and Barbara Walterman, Eugene Modesti and Minnie Modesti, Gilbert L. Paar and Patricia A. Paar, Charles Domanico and Rosemarie Domanico, Thomas A. Richardson and Fern D. Richardson, Bud Ruter and Bernice Ruter, Ralph V. Tuinstra, Kenneth Waters and Kathy Waters, Thomas Weyker and Maye Weyker, Verlyn Almond and Mi
Shaw v. Life Insurance Co. of North Americapublic domain
FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Stephanie Shaw filed this action on October 14, 2014, against Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”).1 Shaw alleges that she was denied long-term disability benefits to which she was entitled under a disability benefit plan (the “Plan”) established by her former employer
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge. Defendant, The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, moves for summary judgment alleging that because Minnesota law applies to this claim, plaintiffs’ personal injury claims abate under the Minnesota survival statute. Docket 69. Alternatively, Good Samaritan alleges that plaintiffs cannot satisfy the elements of t
OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Keith Shwayder appeals his convictions for racketeering, RICO conspiracy, conspiracy, securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. He argues that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel had an actual conflict of interest. Although there was such a conf
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-SEP-2022 09:41 AM Dkt. 123 SO
In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
820 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2011) In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Order Relates to: All Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiff Class Actions. No. M 07-1827 SI. MDL. No. 1827. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 26, 2011. *1056 Samuel W. Lanham, Jr., Lanham & Blackwell, Bangor, ME, Ian Otto, Straus & B
Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. The Board of County Commissioners of Albany County, Wyoming and ConnectGen Albany County LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 31 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 April 17, 2023 MONAGHAN FARMS, INC., Appellant (Petitioner), v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTY, WYOMING, Appellee (Respondent), and CONNECTGEN ALBANY COUNTY LLC, Appellee S-22-0127, S-22-0128 (Intervenor). MICHAEL and MARDEE AANONSEN; MARJORI
STAMAS v. County of Maderapublic domain
795 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2011) Mark STAMAS and Judy Castles, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MADERA, Board of Supervisors of the County of Madera, Gerald Houston, Linda Barlow, Defendants. Case No. CV F 09-0753 LJO SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 14, 2011. *1054 Michael Richard Johnson, Robert M. Dowd, Laura Anne Wol
Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. The Board of County Commissioners of Albany County, Wyoming and ConnectGen Albany County LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 31 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 April 17, 2023 MONAGHAN FARMS, INC., Appellant (Petitioner), v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTY, WYOMING, Appellee (Respondent), and CONNECTGEN ALBANY COUNTY LLC, Appellee S-22-0127, S-22-0128 (Intervenor). MICHAEL and MARDEE AANONSEN; MARJORI