Cases

322 F.3d 1064 TAHOE-SIERRA PRESERVATION COUNCIL, INC., a California non-profit corporation and membership organization; Joseph R. Abrahamson and Charlene Z. Abrahamson, as Co-Trustees of the Joseph R. Abrahamson and Charlene Z. Abrahamson Family Trust; Jane S. Akdoruk; Jesse Aldatz, Jr.; Hugh C. Alexander; Raymond D. Allen, as Trustee of the Allen 1989 Revocable Trust; Gordon Alley; Bruno Alpi; Ernest Arnold; William L. Asay; Edith B. Asay; Nichola

MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are two Rule 12 motions: (1) Denka Performance Elastomer LLC's motion to dismiss; and (2) E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company's motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, DuPont's motion is GRANTED, and Denka's motion is GRANTED without prejudice to the plaintiffs' opportunity to amend their deficient nuisance allegations in their complaint. <

WOODLOCK, District Judge (Dissenting). The main current in this appeal flows through a problem of federal statutory construction which the District Court resolved on cross motions for summary judgment. The majority chooses to bypass the federal statutory question presented, at least for the time being, by invoking the discretion to stay recognized under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United State

254 S.W.3d 361 (2008) STATE of Tennessee v. Edwardo RODRIGUEZ. No. M2005-02466-SC-R11-CD. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 3, 2007 Session. April 24, 2008. *363 William K. Cather, Assistant District Public Defender, Lebanon, Tennessee, for the appellant, Edwardo Rodriguez. Robert E. Cooper

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

OPINION EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge. This action by Lydia Diaz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, has brought in its wake a series of motions by Diaz, proposed intervenors and the defendants. Diaz and the proposed intervenors are recipients of public assistance, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”),1 under various provisions of the Social

456 F.Supp. 1211 (1978) Isaac LORA, as member of a class representing all Black and Hispanic students currently assigned to Special Day Schools for Emotionally Disturbed Students in New York City, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants. No. 75-C-917. United States District Court, E. D. New York. June 2, 1978.

Opinion BAXTER, J.— We are asked to decide whether, in an action that is not certified as a class action, but is brought on behalf of absent persons by a private party under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.),1 the court may order disgorgement into a fluid recovery fund, and whether permitting suc

OPINION AND ORDER WGLALEN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel compliance with subpoenas duces te-cum served on Respondents Bill Vlasic and Bradley A. Stertz, third parties to federal securities litigation pending in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, In re DaimlerChrysler AG Securities Litigation, Docket No. 00-0993-JJF (D.

[J-79-2012] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 563 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the Court of : Common Pleas of Philadelphia County,

685 F.Supp.2d 186 (2010) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: The City of New York, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. MDL No. 1456. Subcategory Case No. 03-10643-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 9, 2010.

TAYLOR, Justice. October 17, 1961, between 9:30 and 10 :00 a. m., plaintiff (appellant) Monte Meyer, a fourteen-yearTold boy, was riding as a passenger in an automobile owned and driven by his father. Plaintiff’s mother, Ann Meyer (guardian ad litem) was also a passenger in the automobile. The father and mother were parties to an action pending in the district court in Caldwell, and were on their way to attend the trial, set t

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

*105SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.), vacating the Injunctions against Argentina upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case and therefore addre

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Since 1984, an association of property owners known as the Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council (“Association”) has been engaged in litigation challenging the regulatory program that protects one of the most pristine environmental habitats on the planet. The Association has fought vigorously for the interests of owners of property in the Lake Tahoe Basin (“Basin”), an aes

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

415 F.Supp. 904 (1976) George ARTHUR et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ewald P. NYQUIST, Individually and as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Defendants. No. Civ-1972-325. United States District Court, W. D. New York. April 30, 1976. *905 *906 *907