Cases

THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2026 WY 24 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2025 February 23, 2026 MARK COLEMAN HELMS, II, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-25-0104 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). A

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00170-CV Andre COLEMAN, Appellant v. Mark MOLINAR, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-25-00170-CV Andre COLEMAN, Appellant v. Mark MOLINAR, Appellee From the County C

Jenkins, Justice: *7 In this case, Mark T. Coleman ("Mr. Coleman") appeals an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which asserted numerous grounds to support his claims of ineffective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel.

594 So.2d 812 (1992) John H. SMITH and Sharon A. Smith, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. MARK COLEMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee. No. 91-00138. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 12, 1992. Rehearing Denied March 13, 1992. John F. Hooley of Vega, Brown, Stanley, Martin & Zelman, P.A., Naples, for appellants. M

OPINION BY BOWES, J,: Mark Coleman appeals' from the judgment of sentence of five to ten years incarceration to be followed by five years probation after a jury found him guilty of two counts of possession with intent to deliver (“PWID”), and one count each of posses *40 sion of a

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner father commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 seeking to terminate his support obligation for the parties’ son on the

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, dated March 11, 2013, which, after a hearing, determined that the petitioner had violated a prison disciplinary rule and imposed a penalty. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the meri

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Per Curiam. Affirmed. Taylor, Conner and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Egan Jr., J. (dissenting). In my view, the testimony of the correction officer who conducted the urinalysis testing fell below the minimum necessary to establish a reliable chain of custody, and I respectfully dissent. The concept of chain of custody by no means requires a correction officer performing a urinalysis test on an inmate to literally keep the sample in his or her physical possession from the momen

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2025-KA-00202-SCT MARK EVERETT McDANIEL a/k/a MARK McDANIEL a/k/a MARK E. McDANIEL v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/17/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GERALD W. CHATHAM, SR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ROSHARWIN LEMOYNE WILLIAMS JEFFREY DOUGLAS ODOM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Jonathan Goodman, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint [ECF No. 21]. Magistrate Judge Goodman filed a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 55], recommending that

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. While in the food service area, petitioner began acting in an intimidating manner by calling a correction officer names, taking a stance with clenched fists an

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Kenneth Coleman (“movant”) is a federal inmate currently confined at the Peters-burg Low Federal Correctional Institution in Petersburg, Virginia. Movant timely filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.I. 21) The government filed an answer in opposition. (D.I. 44) For the

PER CURIAM In this case, we must determine whether the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) applies to alleged communications among ExxonMobil Pipeline Company (EMPCo) employees about Travis Coleman, a terminal technician formerly employed by EMPCo. The court of appeals held that EMPCo did not meet its burden to show that the TCPA applies to Coleman’s suit. 464 S.W.3d 841, 850. Because the alleged communications were made i

432 F.Supp.2d 1030 (2006) Mark COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. CV 05-03614 FMC. United States District Court, C.D. California. May 24, 2006. *1031 Glenn R. Kantor, Tracy A. Collins, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA, for Plaintiff. Dennis G. Rolstad, Michelle Y. Mclsaac, Se

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01440-SCT WILL REALTY, LLC v. MARK ISAACS AND SALLY ISAACS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/16/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PAUL BOURGEOIS, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ANDREW R. NORWOOD JOHN B. HOWELL, III WILLIAM P. WESSLER

In December 1997, petitioner was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of A1k to 9 years for his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third *1402degree. In March 2003, while on parole, petitioner was convicted of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced, again as a second felony offender, to a prison te