Cases

PER CURIAM: * Appellant Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P. (BMP) appeals the district court’s decision, in its appellate capacity, affirming in part and reversing and remanding in part a decision of the bankruptcy court. “The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and are tasked with the duty to continually, and sua sponte, assess their jurisdictio

ZOBEL, Senior United States District Judge Both parties have filed motions in limine. Following are the court's rulings as to those that are ripe. I. Government's Motions • The motion to exclude the introduction of family photos (Docket # 136) is DENIED, although the court reserves the right to limit the number of such photographs as the trial progresses.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Naomi A. Stinson appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. Ms. Stinson filed an amended complaint against 123 defen

MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge. Pending is self-represented Plaintiff Eugene Edward Winder’s complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1). Defendant Gary Maynard, by his counsel, has filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment with affidavits and verified exhibits. ECF No. 15. Winder has filed a reply with a declaration and exhibits. ECF No. 19. No hearing is neede

Harvey Brown, Justice, concurring and dissenting. I concur with the Court’s judgment on issues one, two, and four raised in .County Judge Mark Henry’s appeal. I disagree with its disposition of the third issue and therefore its affirmance of that portion of the district court’s temporary injunction order that required County Judge Henry to order the County Treasurer to pay Bonn

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-1023 ══════════ City of Denton, Petitioner, v. Michael Grim and Jim Maynard, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Senior Judge Davis joined. GREGORY, Chief Judge: In March 1988, Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to attempted murder and a related firearm offense. Several months after his plea, Woodfolk sought relief fro

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1378 ___________________________ Arkansas Times LP Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mark Waldrip, in his official capacity as Trustee of the University of Arkansas Board o

OPINION (April 2, 2012) Greenaway, Circuit Judge This appeal requires us to determine whether the individual needs of an employee can justify noncompliance with an employer’s reasonable administrative order. The Virgin Islands Wrongful Discharge Act (the “WDA”) permits the termination of an employee “who wilfully and in

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. Larry D. Maynard is currently serving a life sentence in Oklahoma state prison arising from a crime that occurred in 1988. He was charged with shooting with intent to kill, and after a lengthy round of competency determinations, an Oklahoma jury determined he was competent to stand trial. Before trial, Maynard dismissed his appointed counsel and moved to proceed pro se. The court granted this reques

USCA11 Case: 20-13365 Document: 48-3 Date Filed: 09/14/2023 Page: 1 of 54 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13365 ____________________ CHARLES EDWARD JONES,

USCA11 Case: 20-13365 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 09/14/2023 Page: 1 of 54 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13365 ____________________ CHARLES EDWARD JONES,

[Cite as State v. Maynard, 2026-Ohio-2558.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HENRY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 7-25-10 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. OPINION AND ROBBY W. MAYNARD, JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Hen

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Raphael, White and Senior Judge Petty PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia THOMAS EDWARD CLARK OPINION BY v. Record No. 0620-22-2 JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY OCTOBER

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15‐3225 MICHAEL J. BELLEAU, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. EDWARD F. WALL, et al., Defendants‐Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

ACCEPTED 01-15-00260 FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/17/2015 8:29:47 PM

LANDAU, P. J., dissenting. At issue in this case is the constitutionality of ORS 167.065(l)(a). That statute prohibits providing to minors depictions of “sadomasochistic abuse, sexual conduct or sexual excitement.” A majority of this court holds that the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad, in violation of Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. I am not persuaded. I believe that

954 S.W.2d 624 (1997) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wendell MAYNARD, Appellant. No. WD 53070. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 21, 1997. *626 Byron Neal Fox, Kansas City, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for responden

NO. 07-08-00319-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A ----------------------------------------------------

NO. 07-08-00319-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS