Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mark Lowell”
Mark Hoff v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Patrick A. Pirtle, Justice Appellant, Mark Hoff, appeals from his conviction for tampering with physical evidence,1 following a plea of guilty, and the resulting sentence of ten years of imprisonment, suspended in favor of community supervision for a period of ten years. By two issues he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress due to (1) insuffi
WIGGINS, Justice. David Lowell Evenson's counsel filed a notice of appeal from a district court ruling *336 in a dispute over workers' compensation penalty benefits. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance Company filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, alleging Evenson failed to t
Lowell Housing Authority v. Melendezpublic domain
Greaney, J. On May 11, 2005, the defendant, armed with an eight-inch kitchen knife, assaulted and attempted to rob a patron in a convenience store located approximately one mile from the Lowell Housing Authority (LHA) development where he was a tenant.1 The LHA commenced a summary process action against the defendant under provisions of the lease requiring tenants to
Gordon v. Lowellpublic domain
95 F.Supp.2d 264 (2000) William GORDON and Kay Gordon, Plaintiffs, v. Pam LOWELL, individually and in her official capacity as agent and/or employee of the County of Berks, George Kovarie, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Berks County Children and Youth Services, *265 Berks County Children and Youth Services, a state agency administered by the county of Berks, and Berks County, a politi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–2097 Filed June 3, 2016 DAVID LOWELL EVENSON, Appellant, vs. WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INC. and SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Winnebago County, Gregg R. Rosenbladt, Judge. Petitioner appeals from district court judgment affirming on judicial review workers’ compensation commissioner’s decisio
Lowell v. City of Baytownpublic domain
264 S.W.3d 31 (2007) Keith LOWELL, Jeff Daigle, Richard S. Domask, W.A. Domask, Ralph Finiello, Rodney Foster, Gaston Gagne, Derrick Gaskin, James Slate Hill, Marshall Hutton, Jared Jackson, James T. Lewis, Tracy E. Lindsey, Victor Medina, Mark Medrano, James Moss Jr., Charles E. Murrell, Scott Pritchett, Raul Rodriguez Jr., Shawn Russi, Brian W. Smith, John Wadley, Millard Williams Jr., Gary M. Willis Jr., Michael Wooster, James Burgess, Robert Burlin,
lowell v. vlctpublic domain
Wy Bie ye ue SR] STATE OF VERMONT )-)) SUPERIOR COURT - CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit Docket No. 544-9-16 Wnev 2 SEPTS A 8:03 TOWN OF LOWELL, VERMONT Plaintiff ee Vv. . Le # VERMONT LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS and VLCT PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INTERMUNICIPAL FUND, INC. Defendants JUDGMENT Plaintiffs claim having been decided in the favor of Defendants by summary judgment ruling entered this day, judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and Plaintiff shall take nothing on the claim. .
Lowell v. Wrightpublic domain
325 Argued and submitted April 5, 2018, reversed and remanded September 2, 2020 Tom LOWELL, dba Piano Studios and Showcase, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew WRIGHT and Artistic Piano, an Oregon corporation, Defendants-Respondents. Jackson County Circuit Court 13CV04582; A16
Lowell v. Flompublic domain
Lowell v Flom (2021 NY Slip Op 03829) Lowell v Flom 2021 NY Slip Op 03829 Decided on June 16, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
Lowell v. Wrightpublic domain
806 Argued and submitted June 24, 2021; decision of Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings June 23, 2022 Tom LOWELL, dba Piano Studios and Showcase, Respondent on Review, v. Matthew WRIGHT and Artisti
United States v. Lowellpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 28, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court
Javier Martinez v. Lowell Clarkpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAVIER MARTINEZ, No. 21-35023 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv- v. 00780-TSZ LOWELL CLARK, Warden, Northwest Detention Center; OPINION NATHALIE ASHER, Tacoma Field Office Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland
Mark Twain Plaza Bank v. Lowell H. Listrom & Co.public domain
BERREY, Judge. Defendant Lowell H. Listrom & Company, Inc., (hereinafter Listrom) a stock brokerage firm, appeals from a judgment of the circuit court. In this court-tried case defendant was found liable to Mark Twain Plaza Bank under the theories of promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent misrepresentation arising from the statements made by the president and an account executive of Listrom concern
Chapin v. University of Massachusetts at Lowellpublic domain
977 F.Supp. 72 (1997) Madonna CHAPIN, Plaintiff v. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AT LOWELL, Paul Parent, George Theokas, and James W. Rowe, Defendants Civil Action No. 96-10291-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 11, 1997. *73 *74 *75
State v. Lowellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION. Al A. Lowell appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court, Franklin County, on jury verdicts convicting him of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (Supp.1987) and unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (Supp.1987). Contrary to Lowell’s contentions on appeal, we conclude that the jury verdicts were not logically irreconcilable, nor do they mandate reversal, see State v. Snow, 513
Javier Martinez v. Lowell Clarkpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAVIER MARTINEZ, No. 21-35023 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00780- v. TSZ LOWELL CLARK, Warden, Northwest Detention Center; ORDER NATHALIE ASHER, Tacoma Field Office Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Se
Divine v. Galen & Lowell Graberpublic domain
ROBERTSON, Judge. Mark L. Divine appeals from an order of the Worker's Compensation Board which affirmed the denial of his application for payment of a share of attorney fees and of expenses, costs, and interest. On appeal, he states the issue as follows: Whether Divine's settlement of a third-party lawsuit, which released Appellee, Galen and Lowell Graber (the "Partnership"), from the obligation of
United States v. Lowellpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Criminal No. 80-cr-00257 (CKK) THOMAS FRANK LOWELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 2, 2019) Pending before this Court is Defendant Thomas Frank Lowell’s [2] pro se Motion to Expunge Criminal Re
Javier Martinez v. Lowell Clarkpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAVIER MARTINEZ, No. 21-35023 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-00780- TSZ LOWELL CLARK, Warden, Northwest Detention Center; NATHALIE ASHER, Tacoma Field Office Director, OPINION United States Immigration and Customs Enfo
The Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Corporation v. Margy Herman, Mark Lowell Herman, and Leo Newmanpublic domain
MATTHES, Circuit Judge. The basic question for determination in this declaratory judgment action instituted by The Western Casualty and Surety Company (Western) is whether an automobile liability insurance policy issued by it was in force and effect at the time the automobile covered by the-policy was involved in an accident. The tria