Cases

53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012) 139 Cal. Rptr. 3d 315 273 P.3d 513 BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; ADAM HOHNBAUM et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. S166350. Supreme Court of California. April 12, 2012. *1013 Ak

Affirmed in part, and Reversed and Remanded in part, and Opinion filed March 20, 2014. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00044-CV JOHANNES “JOE” ELMGREN AND VALARIE ELMGREN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF THEIR MINOR CHILDREN, Appellants V. INEOS USA, LLC F/K/A INNOVENE USA, LLC, INEOS POLYMERS, INC., A/K/A INEOS OLEFINS, INEOS

Motion for Rehearing Denied; Affirmed in part; and Reversed and Remanded in part; Opinion filed March 20, 2014 Withdrawn; and Substitute Opinion filed April 17, 2014. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00044-CV JOHANNES “JOE” ELMGREN AND VALARIE ELMGREN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF THEIR MINOR CHILDREN, Appellants

NEALON, J., Two former servers at local Red Robin restaurants have instituted this class action lawsuit asserting violations of the minimum wage provisions of the Minimum Wage Act of 1968 (“MWA”), 42 RS. § 333.102 et seq. The MWA permits employers to satisfy their minimum wage obligation of $7.25/hour to “tipped employees” by paying a minimum wage of $2.83/hour and utilizing a “tip credit” in the amount of $4.4

■ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Shirley Garnett brought this putative class action against defendant ADT LLC, asserting claims arising out -of the' alleged failure to reimburse her and others for work-related expenses and failure to provide accurate wage statements required by California law. Defendant remov

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

McDONALD, J. General Statutes § 31-60 (b) carves out certain exceptions to Connecticut's minimum wage laws. Among other things, § 31-60 (b) directs the Labor Commissioner, acting through the defendant, the Department of Labor, to adopt regulations that recognize that employers may include gratuities as part of the minimum fair wage for employees in the restaurant and hotel industries wh

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the district court. Plaintiff Karyn Risch complains that the Royal Oak Police Department’s denial of her promotion to detective in 2005 was based upon an unlawful reason — sex discrimination. However, “[t]he ultimate burden of persuading the trier of fact that the defendant intentionally discriminated

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICKEY LEE DILTS; RAY RIOS; and No. 12-55705 DONNY DUSHAJ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly D.C. No. situated, 3:08-cv-00318- Plaintiffs-Appellants, CAB-BLM v. OPINION PENSKE LOGISTICS, LLC; and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P., a Delaware corporatio

Filed 3/6/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- RIVER’S SIDE AT WASHINGTON SQUARE C095860 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, (Super. Ct. No. CV2017-1712)

Filed 3/30/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- RIVER’S SIDE AT WASHINGTON SQUARE C095860 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, (Super.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction Plaintiff Marisol Gomez (“Plaintiff”) has filed separate motions, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f),1 to strike select affirmative defenses alleged by Defendant Bedrosian Farms, LLC (“Bedrosian”) (Doc. 11), and Defendant J. Jacobo Farm

ORDER GRANTING COSTCO’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTIONS GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. INTRODUCTION In this collective and class action, plaintiffs Eric Stiller (“Stiller”) and Joseph Moro (“Moro”) (both, “Plaintiffs”) allege defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) violated federal and state wage and hour laws through the implementation of clos

Cuéllar, J. We granted review to address two related issues: whether employers are required to permit their employees to take off-duty rest periods under Labor Code section 226.7 and Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage order No. 4-2001 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040 (Wage Order 4)), and whether employers may require their employees to remain "on call" during rest periods. What

SUBSTITUTE OPINION MARC W. BROWN, Justice. Appellants Johannes “Joe” Elmgren and Valarie Elmgren, both individually as next friends for their minor children (collectively, the “Elmgrens”), appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of ap-pellees, Ineos USA, LLC f/k/a Innovene USA, LLC, Ineos Polymers, Inc., a/k/a Ineos Olefins, Ineos Olefins & Polymers USA, a division of Ineos USA, LLC (collec

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This case raises important issues about employer liability for a hostile work environment created by third parties and about non-employer liability for employment-related discrimination under the Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA). We articulate here the rules which govern these claims. Tara Roy, the plaintiff, worked as a nurse, employed by Corr

LYNCH, Chief Judge. Nicole Ponte appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Steelcase Inc., on her claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B that (1) she was subject to sexual harassment while employed there, and (2) she was terminated in retaliation for her reports of such

ORDER This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys and judges, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the applicable continuing legal education provisions of Gov. Bar R. X and Gov. J

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICKEY LEE DILTS; RAY RIOS; and No. 12-55705 DONNY DUSHAJ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly D.C. No. situated, 3:08-cv-00318- Plaintiffs-Appellants, CAB-BLM v. ORDER AND PENSKE LOGISTICS, LLC; and AMENDED PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P., a OPIN