Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mark Rubin”
United States v. William Mark Rubinpublic domain
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. William Rubin appeals his conviction of ten counts of securities fraud brought under 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a) and 77x (1982) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982), and two counts of filing a false securities registration statement under 15 U.S.C. § 77x and 18 U.S.C. § 2. On appeal he argues (1) that the district court
RUBIN YOUNG v. DR. BRENDA C. SNIPES and MARK BOGENpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RUBIN YOUNG, Appellant, v. DR. BRENDA C. SNIPES, BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTION'S CANVASSING BOARD, and MARK BOGEN, candidate, Appellees. No. 4D18-2221 [February 14, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court f
Rubin v. Morronepublic domain
Agnes, Peter W., J. Introduction The plaintiffs, Mark and Brenda Rubin, filed a civil action against the defendant3 Zoning Board of Appeals of the Ciiy of Worcester (“Board”) under G.L.c. 40A, §17 to challenge the grant of a variance to permit an existing basketball hoop on their neighbor’s property. The Board approved a variance from the required setback from the front yard and fr
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3338-18T1 SOLOMON RUBIN, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, June 8, 2020 v. APPELLATE DIVISION MARK TRESS and CEDAR HOLDING
GAWRYCH v. Rubinpublic domain
Leave to Appeal Denied November 29, 2006.
Rubin v. Department of Licensingpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 07-2-33262-6, Susan Craighead, J., entered December 4, 2007. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rubin v. Padillapublic domain
*1135 Opinion MARGULIES, J. — Three small political parties and several party members and candidates sought to invalidate California’s electoral system for statewide and legislative offices, contending the system, which consists of an open nonpartisan election followed by a runoff
KACT, Inc. v. Rubinpublic domain
Celinas, J. Claiming that actions by the defendants, trustees of the Vendóme Condominium Trust (trust), had caused them to lose the potential sale of their commercial condominium units (units) and their restaurant business to the Briar Group (Briar), KACT, Inc., operator of Spasso’s Restaurant (Spasso’s or the restaurant), and Paul Glinski, as trustee of the Vendóme Restaurant Realty Trust, which owned the units (collectively pla
Koseatac v. Rubinpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel. ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed. Plaintiff Kerim Koseatac appeals from so much of a judgment of the United State
921 F.2d 1224 James T. WYATT, Sr., Patricia Wyatt, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,Mark Rubin, Robert Balogh, etc., Defendants.James T. WYATT, Sr., Patricia Wyatt, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee,Mark Rubin, Robert Balogh, a Florida General Partnership,Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 89-7590, 89-7621. Uni
Mauer v. Rubinpublic domain
926 N.E.2d 947 (2010) Marshall MAUER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roger RUBIN and Beermann, Swerdlove, Woloshin, Barezky, Becker, Genin & London, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-08-3211. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. March 26, 2010. *950 Lawrence Seiwert, Chicago, IL, for Appellant. Mark P. Stand
State v. Rubinpublic domain
276 S.W.3d 881 (2009) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marc S. RUBIN, Appellant. No. ED 90970. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. February 10, 2009. Mark W. Hagemeister, Chesterfield, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, John M. Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Before KURT S.
Rubin v. Leshnerpublic domain
*474Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered January 12, 2006, which denied plaintiff prime tenant’s motion for partial summary judgment against defendant subtenant as to the first, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh causes of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted on the issue of liability, and the matter remanded for trial on damages as to th
Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
STAHL, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs-appellants in this case are United States citizens who were injured in a 1997 terrorist attack that Hamas orchestrated in Jerusalem. They sued the Islamic Republic of Iran in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that Iran had provided material support to Hamas and was therefore liable for the attack. In 2003,
Rubin v. Moyspublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whitman County, No. 27044, Philip H. Faris, J. Pro Tern., entered October 13, 2000. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Brown, JJ.
Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
810 F.Supp.2d 402 (2011) Jenny RUBIN, et al., Plaintiffs-Judgment Creditors, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants-Judgment Debtors, v. Museum of Fine Arts and Harvard University, et al., Trustee Process Respondents. Civil Action No. 06-11053-GAO. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 15, 2011.
Rubin v. MF Global, Ltd.public domain
634 F.Supp.2d 459 (2009) Michael RUBIN, Plaintiff, v. MF GLOBAL, LTD. et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 2233 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 16, 2009. *462 A. Arnold Gershon, Regina Marie Calcaterra, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Carol V. Gilden, Elizabeth Ann Berney, Lynda J. Grant, Cohen, Milstein, Sellers
City Lighting Products Group v. Rubin Brown, LLPpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. RubinBrown, LLP appeals the judgment of the trial court denying its Motion to Compel Arbitration. The trial court held the Engagement Letters were invalid because the agent who acted on behalf of the City Lighting Products Group (“CLP”) lacked the authority to bind the corporation to arbitration, and CLP did not ratify the agreement to arbitrate. We have re
Rubin v. Moyspublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whitman County, No. 27044, Philip Faris, J. Pro Tern., entered October 31, 1997. Reversed by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, A.C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Brown, JJ.
Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
(2008) Jenny RUBIN, et al., Plaintiffs-Judgment Creditors, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants-Judgment Debtors, v. Museum of Fine Arts and Harvard University, et al., Trustee Process Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-11053-GAO. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 31, 2008. ORDER O'TOOLE, District Judge