Cases

DIXON, JUDGE: Appellant, Donald Steffan in his individual capacity as an employee of the Jefferson County Board of Education, appeals from an opinion and order of the Jefferson *389Circuit Court denying his motion for summary judgment based on immunity under the Paul D. Coverdell Teacher Liability Protection Act of 2001,

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA. MIKVA, Chief Judge: Joseph Steffan was, by all accounts, an exceptional midshipman as he prepared to graduate from the United States Naval Academy in 1987. Mr. Steffan’s exemplary performance at the Academy had earned him numerous honors and the respect and praise of his superior officers. Most notably, he w

BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judge RANDOLPH joins, concurring in part: I agree with the court’s analysis in every respect but one. I cannot concur in its holding, in part III.B., that Steffan lacked standing “to bring his particular challenge to the DOD Directives.” In his complaint, Steffan acknowledges what he describes as his “homosexual orientation,” notes that th

611 N.W.2d 573 (2000) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. James William EGGE, Appellant. No. C3-99-1415. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 13, 2000. *574 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Robert A. Stanich, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Mark Steffan, Jackson County Attorney, Jackson, MN (for respondent). John

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jun 29 2018, 6:04 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing

Motions Granted in Part; Motion for Sanctions Denied; Order filed September 17, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-13-00523-CV ____________ MARK THUESEN, Appellant V. CATHERINE E. SCHOOLAR, INDIVIDUALLY; CANDACE GARCIA, INDIVID

575 S.E.2d 540 (2003) Larry TABOR, Amanda Tabor, Henry Alvin Tabor, and Norma Jean Tabor, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, Orange County Health Department, Orange County Planning Department, David Hecht in his capacity as Environmental Health Specialist of the Orange County Health Department, Defendants. No. COA02-423. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 4, 2003.

Opinion issued August 4, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The

563 S.E.2d 55 (2002) Judy Ann SIDDEN, Plaintiff v. Richard Bernard MAILMAN, Defendant. No. COA01-63. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 21, 2002. *56 Sheridan & Steffan, P.C. by Mark T. Sheridan, Hillsborough, for plaintiff-appellant. The Brough Law Firm by G. Nicholas Herman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellee.<

447 S.E.2d 491 (1994) Wanda JORDAN, Christine Jordan, Paul Jordan, By and Through his Guardian ad litem Joel Winston, and Dianne Kehrle, Plaintiffs, v. FOUST OIL COMPANY, INC., Wilfred Phelps, and Nancy Phelps, Defendants. No. 9315SC501. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 6, 1994. *492 Berman & Shangler by Dean A.

(2008) Steffan HOBBS, by and through his parents and next friends, Jimmy and Janet HOBBS, Plaintiff, v. Marsha ZENDERMAN, Joey Kellenaers, and Pamela Hyde, Secretary of the Department of Human Services, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. No. 06-CIV-0985 BB/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 31, 2008. OPINION

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered July 22, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to set aside a verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a). It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when the motor veh

(2008) Stuart A. GOLD, et al., Plaintiff, v. CADENCE INNOVATION, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 07-14435. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 22, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING J.P. MORGAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS LARRY J. WINGET'S INTERPLEADER CLAIM[1] AVERN COHN, District Judge. <

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Paul Wojtaszek, J.), entered December 29, 2015. The judgment dismissed the complaint upon a jury verdict of no cause of action. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the posttrial *1801motion is granted, the verdict is set aside, and a new trial i

Alligood v Doe (2021 NY Slip Op 05186) Alligood v Doe 2021 NY Slip Op 05186 Decided on October 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Paul Wojtaszek, J.), entered December 29, 2015. The judgment dismissed the complaint upon a jury verdict of no cause of action. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the posttrial *1801motion is granted, the verdict is set aside, and a new trial i

No. 722 August 13, 2025 563 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARK RICHARD RIENSTRA, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 23CR11717; A182024 Steffan Alexander, Judge. Submitted April 21, 2025. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 397 CA 16-00667 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. AMY REID, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CARRIE LEVY AND ROCK CITY CHRYSLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.) BROWN CHIARI LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL DRUMM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (TODD C. BUSHWA

Matter of Gayle v Muir (2022 NY Slip Op 07233) Matter of Gayle v Muir 2022 NY Slip Op 07233 Decided on December 21, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1282 CA 14-01027 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF THE FORECLOSURE OF TAX LIENS BY PROCEEDING IN REM PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 11 OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW BY COUNTY OF GENESEE RELATING TO THE 2011 TOWN AND COUNTY TAX. ---------------------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COUNTY OF GENESEE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT; TIMOTHY