Cases

ACCEPTED 14-15-00028-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 4:26:25 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge: Plaintiffs Sean Ahearn, Eric Bohm, John Brett, Angelo Brucchieri, William G. Can-field, Ralph Dudley, Arthur Finkel, Salvatore A. Gandolfo, Tina Green, Andrew Koplik, David Menoni, Theodore Pearl-man, Vincent Pezzuti, Dorothy Rabsey, Martin Jay Siegel, Stanley J. Somer, and Marc Tell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all other

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. OPINION JUSTICE WECHT *219In these consolidated cases, we granted allowance of appeal to determine whether and to what extent a hospital and a health care staffing agency have a legal duty to prevent a terminated employe

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2024-Ohio-1981.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113104 v. : RICHARD BROWN, :

[Cite as State v. Flores Santiago, 2020-Ohio-1274.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108458 v. : ARCADIO FLORES-SANTIAGO,

267 F.Supp.2d 545 (2003) ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 102CV32. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. March 31, 2003.

OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court as a result of a hearing to determine damages for the class action Plaintiffs and to consider Plaintiffs’ counsels’ application for an award of attorneys’ fees. Defendant Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.’s (“MCGP”) liability for violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act of 1988 (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. §

WASHINGTON, Chief Judge: Jo Carpenter appeals from a decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (“Commission”) finding that her housing provider, The Markswright 'Company, Inc. (“Markswright”), did.not illegally increase her rent in violation of the Rental Housing Act of 1985, D.C.Code §§ 42-3501.01 to -3509.07 (2014) (the “Act”). Specifically, Ms. Carpenter alleges that the Commission erred in concluding t

643 F.3d 502 (2011) Stephanie WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-5564. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 13, 2011. Decided and Filed: June 28, 2011. *505 ARGUED: Justin S. Gilbert, Gilbert, Russell, McWherter PLC, Jackson, Te

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND CERTIFICATION ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. Plaintiffs filed a single-count class action Complaint (Doe. # 1), alleging that Defendant Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. (“MCGP”) violated the Worker Adjustment and Retaining Act of 1988 (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. The case is now before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Doc. # 55)

[Cite as Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp., 2013-Ohio-4186.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 98728 and 98729 NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT PLAINTIF

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court as a result of a hearing to determine damages for the class action Plaintiffs and to consider Plaintiffs’ counsels’ application for an award of attorneys’ fees. Defendant Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.’s (“MCGP”) liability for violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act of 1988 (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. §

CONCURRENCE BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in the panel opinion. Wiles has not shown that his counsel was unconstitutionally ineffective during the mitigation phase of his trial. * * * Now in my thirtieth year as a judge on this Court, I have had an inside view of our system of capital punishment almost since the death penalty was reintrod

DATE: 08/05/2014 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:36:36 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312013 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED ______________________________________________________

494 F.Supp.2d 232 (2007) In re SEPTEMBER 11TH LITIGATION. No. 21 MC 97(AKH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 3, 2007. *233 *234 Elizabeth `Smith, Jodi Westbrook Flowers, Ronald L. Motley, Michael Edward Elsner, Mary F. Schiavo, Donald A. Migliori, *235</

WILSON, Circuit Judge: Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. (MCGP) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for appellees, MCGP employees Judy Weekes-Walker, et. al (Weekes-Walker), on appellees’ claims under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act of 1988 (WARN Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109, and as to MCGP’s assertion of the unforeseeable business circumstances defe

LOGUE, J. Silvio Membreno and the Florida Association of Vendors, Inc. (collectively, “the Street Vendors”) appeai the decision of the trial court upholding the constitutionality of the City of Hialeah’s 2013 amendments to its ordinance governing street vendors. We affirm on all points raised. In light of Estate of McCall v. United States, 134 So.3d 894 (Fla.2014

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

267 F.Supp.2d 533 (2003) ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 102CV32. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. March 31, 2003.