Cases

PER CURIAM. These are further proceedings in Marlowe v. State, 797 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). When the appeal was initially brought, defendant-appellant Marlowe was represented by counsel who filed an appearance. However, counsel never filed a brief. As this was an appeal from the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief, the matter was submitted to the panel without briefs. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2

[Cite as Bennett v. Bennett, 2023-Ohio-4856.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY In the Matter of: Court of Appeals No. L-22-1279 Paul A. Bennett, et al. Trial Court No. 20210ADV02881 Appellant v. Paula Bennett DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee

[Cite as State v. Bennett, 2018-Ohio-3623.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-09-138 : OPINION - vs -

MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has reviewed the record and deems a hearing unnecessary. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case sounds in employment discrimin

45 Cal.4th 577 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERIC WAYNE BENNETT, Defendant and Appellant. No. S058472. Supreme Court of California. January 29, 2009. *582 Tamara P. Holland, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Rober

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice *275Schlesinger J.), entered April 21, 2006, on a jury verdict in defendants’ favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs challenge to the court’s response to a jury note is unpreserved (see People v Lewis, 13 AD3d 208, 212 n 6 [2004], affd 5 NY3d 546 [2005]), and we decline to review it in the interest

146 P.3d 63 (2006) STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Donna Jean BENNETT, Petitioner. No. CR-05-0533-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. November 9, 2006. *65 Barbara Lawall, Pima County Attorney by Taren M. Ellis, Deputy County Attorney, Tucson, Attorneys for State of Arizona. Adam N. Bleier, Attorney at Law by Adam N. B

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered January 24, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of enterprise corruption, and sentencing him to a term of 2V2 to 7V2 years, unanimously affirmed. Defendant’s claim that the People violated the terms of his cooperation agreement and guilty plea is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about May 5, 2006, which denied plaintiffs motion for disclosure sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff represents that the parties’ depositions were scheduled for January 12, 2006, and argues that defendants’ willful failure to produce witnesses deprived him of his right to deposition priority. Defendants do not deny the scheduling of all depositio

326 S.E.2d 351 (1985) STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Bruce MARLOWE. No. 845SC493. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 5, 1985. Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Archie W. Anders, Raleigh, for the State. Appellate Defender Adam Stein by Asst. Appellate Defender James A. Wynn, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellant. COZORT, Judge.<

729 N.W.2d 80 (2007) 273 Neb. 300 Lyla F. BENNETT, appellant, v. SAINT ELIZABETH HEALTH SYSTEMS, doing business as Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, appellee. No. S-05-1306. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 30, 2007. *81 Jason G. Ausman, of Johnson, Welch & Ausman, P.C., Omaha, for appellant. Trav

PER CURIAM: Nicholas Marlow, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Kevin Thomas Duffy, Judge, dismissing his complaint against the Department of Education (the “Department”) and the Secretary of Education, William Bennett. This case arises out of an administrative complaint filed by Marlow in March 1979 with th

248 F.Supp.2d 166 (2002) Karen BENNETT et alia, Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY et alia, Defendants. No. CV-02-3499 (CPS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 18, 2002. *168 Jane Greengold Stevens, Laura Davis, New York Legal Assistance Group, New York City, for plaintiffs. Charles S. Klein

847 So.2d 579 (2003) BUDGET RENT-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. Eddie BENNETT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ladarren L. Darden, et al., Appellees. No. 3D01-3174. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 18, 2003. *580 Richard A. Sherman (Ft. Lauderdale); Michael P. Rudd, Miami; Marlow, Connell,

This case comes to this court on certification of the Springfield Court of Appeals as involving a construction of the revenue laws of the State. The plaintiff is the Collector of the Revenue for New Madrid County and defendant is a manufacturer of lumber and its products, located at Morehouse, in that county. As such, defendant gave bond, as required by law, for the payment of the taxes lawfully assessed against it for the year 1928. This suit is on such bond. There is no dispute as to the pr

KERNER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Oltman filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 charging defendants with a conspiracy to deprive him of his civil rights. The District Judge directed a verdict in favor of defendant, Dr. Miller, at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence and the jury found in favor of the other defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Plaintiff and his wife we

On Petition for Rehearing MR. JUSTICE DAYIS: On petition for rehearing. By petition for rehearing the defendants earnestly insist that this case should not go back for a new trial, because as that petition reads the “plaintiff’s demand was for $3,500.00 cash to which by his own testimony he was not entitled until at least the month of September or October, 1951. Thus his suit, filed in May, 1951, was clearly p

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE MOENS DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO ENJOIN THE STATE COURT PROCEEDING FILED BY THE ESTATE OF GERALD RALPH BOGE MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. *681TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................681 A. Factual Backgrou

Miller, Judge. Following a bench trial, Jonathan Allen Collins was convicted of possession of methamphetamine in violation of OCGA § 16-13-30 (a). Collins claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in an allegedly unlawful search and in refusing to treat him as a first offender at sentencing. We discern no error and affirm. In January 2005, a Houston County police off

ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This civil suit is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 57]. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED. I. Undisputed Facts The following facts are undisputed unless stated otherwise. GMRI is a Florida corporation which is a subsidiary of Dar-den Restaurants. Defendant is a