Cases

:Tasha Rose Marsh (Pro Se Rppellant)To:Carol flnne Harley 16:16 12/11/17 ET Pg 2-25 CAUSE NO: 0917-00184-CV IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS AT BEAUMONT TASHA ROSE MARSH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NATHANIEL MARSH, § § No. 468, 2018 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID Nos. 1707006525,

MCCULLOUGH vs. CHASE GREAT MARSH LLC, MISC 20-000208 SHEILA MORGAN McCULLOUGH, as Trustee of the 205 Scudder Realty Trust, Plaintiff, v. CHASE GREAT MARSH LLC, Defendant MISC 20-000208 MAY 7, 2021 BARNSTABLE, ss. VHAY, J. DECISION

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-382 (Filed: 19 January 2021) *************************************** BILOXI MARSH LANDS * CORPORATION, et al., * * Motion for Summary Judgment; Cross- Plaintiff, * Motion for Summary Judgment; Statute

Statement of Reasons Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) JACK B. WEINSTEIN, District Judge: I. Introduction 329 II. Facts.....................................................................331 A. Fraud and Conspiracy................................................331 1. Scheme........

OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. Robert Lane Marsh, appellant, appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon after he entered a plea of nolo contendere pursuant to a plea bargain. Prior to his plea entry, appellant filed a *165 </

Opinion MALLANO, P. J. An employee of an insurance broker was required each workday to drive to and from the office in her personal vehicle. During the workday, the employee had to use her vehicle to visit prospective clients, make presentations, provide educational seminars, follow leads, and transport company materials and coemployees to work-related destinations. On April 15, 2010, the e

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 20, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MORRIS MARSH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Johnson County No. 5066 Robert E. Cupp, Judge No. E2013-01343-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 4, 2014 The Defendant, Morris Marsh, was convicted by a jury of

Justice Stevens’ dissent gives several reasons why this case, and any criminal case in which the State is the petitioner, does not deserve our attention. “ ‘[N]o rule of law,’ ” he says, “ ‘commanded the Court to grant certiorari.’ ” Post, at 201 (quoting California v. Ramos, 463 U. S. 992, 1031 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting)). But that is true, of course

*135DECISION AND ORDER APPROVING THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; CERTIFYING THE CLASS FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES; APPROVING THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION; AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES; GRANTING CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS; AND REJECTING THE OBJECTIONS RECEIVED McMAHON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Named Plaintiffs Donald Hun

Garry, J. *1071In the context of medical malpractice, punitive damages may be recovered when a defendant’s conduct evinces “ £a reckless indifference equivalent to willful or intentional misdoing’ ” (Brooking v Polito, 16 AD3d 898, 899 [2005], quoting Frenya v Champlain Val. Physicians’ Hosp. Med. Ctr., 133 AD2d 1000, 1000 [1987] [citation omitted]),

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00150-CR No. 02-21-00151-CR ___________________________ HENRY ARTHUR DIGGS MARSH AKA HENRY M. DIGGS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from 297th District Court

291 S.W.3d 43 (2009) WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY, Appellant, v. Reginald Charles COLEMAN, Appellee. No. 14-08-00910-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). May 21, 2009. Rehearing Overruled July 2, 2009. *44 Teresa Slowen Valderrama, Houston, for appellant. K. Scott Brazil, William Lura, Cha

707 N.E.2d 998 (1999) Jason C. MARSH and Rhonda Marsh, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Kirk DIXON, Dyna Soar Aerobatics, Inc., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A05-9803-CV-146. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 12, 1999. *999 James F. Ludlow, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellants. Michael A. Aspy, Landau, Omahana & Kopk

JUSTICE STEIGMANN delivered the opinion of the court: In December 1996, the trial court entered an order (1) dissolving the marriage of petitioner, Brooks Marsh, and respondent, Frankie Marsh, and (2) granting the parties joint custody of their four children, pursuant to their marital settlement agreement. In August 1999, Brooks filed a motion to modify custody and awa

Dismissed and Opinion filed May 21, 2009 Dismissed and Opinion filed May 21, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of A

4030022.dlm.wpd NO. 4-03-0022 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT In re: the Marriage of BROOKS MARSH, Petitioner-Appellant, and FRANKIE MARSH,

SHRUM, Judge. A jury found Michael Marsh (Defendant) guilty of the class C felony of possession of a *61controlled substance, § 195.202.1 Defendant was charged as and found to be a prior and persistent offender as defined in §§ 558.016 and 557.036.4. The trial court sentenced Defendant to a term of 12 year’s imprisonment. However, in the “Sen

NOONAN, Circuit Judge: Phillip Marsh and his five co-defendants appeal their convictions of conspiring to defraud the United States by impeding the collection of federal income taxes and their convictions of related crimes. They also appeal their sentences, which, as to Phillip Marsh total a term of imprisonment of 17 1/2 years, as to his wife Marlene a term of 14 years, and as to the other defendants lesser but still subst

79 F.Supp.2d 1068 (2000) Richard MARSH, Plaintiff, v. HOG SLAT, INC., Defendant. No. C 98-3082-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. January 6, 2000. Dennis M. Lawyer of The Lawyer Law Firm in West Des Moines, IA, for plaintiff Richard Marsh. Deborah M. Tharnish and Sharon K. Malheiro of Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts, P.C.