Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Marshall R. Prosser, Sr.”
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1678 Doc: 88 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 28 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1678 TYRONE HENDERSON, SR.; GEORGE I. HARRISON, JR.; ROBERT MCBRIDE, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated,
¶ 62. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. {concurring in part and dissenting in part). I cannot join the majority opinion, which casts aside the cardinal principle of statutory interpretation: Save. Do not destroy.1 f 63. This court ordinarily follows the principle of constitutional avoidance. This court generally does not "decide constit
2017 WI 67 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP275 COMPLETE TITLE: The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Crime Victims Rights Board, Respondent-Appellant,
Commonwealth v. Prosserpublic domain
BY JUDGE ROBERT L. HARRIS, SR. The Defendant in the above-styled case has been charged with carrying a concealed weapon after having previously been convicted of an identical offense. While a first offense is classified as a Class 1 misdemeanor, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-308(A) (1992 Supp.), punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a fine of not more than $2,500.00, id. § 18.2-11, a second offense is classified as a Cl
Jerry Fitch, Sr. v. Johnny Valentinepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2005-CA-01800-SCT JERRY FITCH, SR. v. JOHNNY VALENTINE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/2005 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANDREW K. HOWORTH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MARSHALL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DION JEFFERY SHANLEY S. DUKE GOZA ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:
In re Coquico, Inc.public domain
Opinion STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction The above Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case was filed on July 9, 2013. It was dismissed with prejudice on January 14, 2014. Dismissal followed a two day evidentiary hearing brought on by the Motion (“Dismissal Motion”) of creditor Angel E. Rodriquez Miranda (“Rodriquez”). The Dismissal Motion was filed on September 27, 2013.
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. J.H. v. R&M Tagliareni, LLC (A-6-18) (081128) Argued March 26, 2019 -- Decided July 31, 2019 FERNANDEZ-VINA, J., writing for the Court. The Court consi
Richard R. Riss, Sr. v. Ardith L. Andersonpublic domain
BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. This diversity action is one for damages for defamation by television on September 15, 1959. It was tried to the court and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff against the individual defendant for $2,000 actual damages and $8,000 punitive damages. That defendant has appealed. The plaintiff Anderson is an over-the-road truck d
Aikens v. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.public domain
348 Pa. Superior Ct. 17 (1985) 501 A.2d 277 Albert J. AIKENS, Richard J. Aikens, Clifford M. Aikens, Michael J. Alloe, Helen Arble, Harold E. Bailey, Eugene Baker, Martha Kay Baker, Donna J. Banyas, Fred Barton, Michael D. Bateman, Dennis Beldin, George Benec, John D. Benec, Reginald Bethune, John Bey, Harold John Blakely, Benjamin Brown, Jr., James P. Bucci, Ronald J. Bure, Alice Burgett, Sigmonda Catalone, Eiljah Chapman, Chea C
Commonwealth v. Burnspublic domain
OPINION BY Chief Justice LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. In this interlocutory appeal, filed pursuant to Code § 8.01-670.1, we consider whether plaintiff's claims for negligence and gross negligence against an employee of the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Commonwealth of Virginia are barred by the public duty doctrine. Plaintiff, Karen C. Burns, administrato
Holmes v. National City Bank (In Re Holmes)public domain
414 B.R. 115 (2009) In re Jon T. HOLMES, Debtor. Jon T. Holmes, Defendant/Appellant, v. National City Bank, Plaintiff/Appellee. Bankr. No. 07-43440. Adversary Proceeding No. 07-05811. Civil Action No. 08-CV-13858. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 13, 2009. *118 Marshall D. Schultz, Sout
596 F.2d 254 John A. COCHRANE, Appellant,v.IOWA BEEF PROCESSORS, INC., Edward W. Rothe and Lee Freeman,Sr., Appellees.Lex HAWKINS, Appellant,v.IOWA BEEF PROCESSORS, INC., Edward W. Rothe and Lee Freeman,Sr., Appellees. Nos. 77-1988, 78-1008. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 18, 1978.Decided Jan. 5, 1979.Rehe
TONE, Circuit Judge. The principal issue before us in this diversity case is whether under Illinois law an automobile manufacturer has a duty so to design and to manufacture its product that its occupants will not be subjected to an unreasonable risk of injury if a collision occurs which is not itself caused by any defects in the con
WILKEY, Circuit Judge: The United States brought suit under the jurisdictional grant of 28 U.S.C. § 1345 alleging conversion of 578 bales of cotton in which it held a security interest. Named as defendants were Walter A. Hext, Sr. (Hext), the grower of the cotton, the W. A. Hext & Sons Gin Co., Inc. (the Gin Co.), a corporation
Moore v. Environmental Construction Corp.public domain
KELLER, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Appellants, John G. Moore, Sr. and Sharon Moore, Personal Representatives of the Estate of John G. Moore, Jr. appeal from an opinion of the Court of Appeals that affirmed the Order Granting Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (“JNOV”) entered by the trial court. On September 30, 1999, a Hopkins County jury determined that Appellee, Environmental Constructio
Pueblo v. Costas Elenapublic domain
Opinión de conformidad emitida por el Juez Asociado Se-ñor Martínez Torres, a la que se unen los Jueces Asocia-dos Señores Kolthoff Caraballo y Rivera García. Una vez más tenemos ante nuestra consideración la ra-zonabilidad del requerimiento de documentos en manos de un tercero. Nos corresponde determinar quiénes tienen le-gitimación activa para solicitar la supresión de unos docu-<
Deakyne v. Selective Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
728 A.2d 569 (1997) David R. DEAKYNE, Sr., Plaintiff, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. C.A. No. 96C-07-078-JEB. Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: July 23, 1997. Decided: December 22, 1997. James A. Erisman, of Wilmington, Delaware, for plaintiff. Roger D. Landon, and Mary Anne McLane, of Wilmington
Lovell v. Brockpublic domain
952 S.W.2d 161 (1997) 330 Ark. 206 Larry Don LOVELL, Sr., and Lynn A. Lovell, Appellants, v. Gerald BROCK, Tim Thomas, and Alfred Lee Brock, Appellees. No. 96-1374. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 9, 1997. *162 Floyd M. Thomas, Jr., El Dorado, for Appellants. Elbert S. Johnson, Blytheville, David
663 F.2d 713 Carlisle W. BRISCOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Sgt. Martin LaHUE, Defendant-Appellee.Charles TALLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James D. CROSSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Chris P. VICKERS, Sr. and James N. Ballard, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Sgt. James W. HUNLEY, Individually and in his capacity as anagent or employee of the Cedar Lake, IndianaPolice Department, Defendant-Appellee.
Van Dunk v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp.public domain
45 A.3d 965 (2012) 210 N.J. 449 Kenneth VAN DUNK, Sr. and Deborah Van Dunk, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORPORATION; Reckson Construction and Development LLC; Paulus, Sokolowski & Fleming, Inc.; and Joseph Fleming, P.E., Defendants, and James Construction Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. A-69 September Term 2010, 066949. Supreme Court of New J