⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Martin Ramirez and San Juana Ramirez”

Vaquero v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 221 F. App'x 586
MEMORANDUM ** Lucia Juana Vaquero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of: (1) the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider its order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal and (2) the Legalization Appeals Unit’s (“LAU”) order dismissing her appeal from the denial of her Special Agricultura
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010-11-10 · Published · cited 1× · 364 S.W.3d 309; 2010 WL 4514152; 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8926
MEMORANDUM OPINION STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice. Appellee Juana Lorena Arvizu, individually and as next Mend of Jonathan Rene Arvizu (“Arvizu”), sued appellees Montgomery County Auto Auction (“MCAA”) and Edward Cantu, as well as appellant The Estate of George Puckett d/b/a Puckett Auto Sales (“Puckett”),1 for personal injuries sustained when her vehicle was struck by a vehicle
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-08-16 · Published · cited 70× · 303 F.3d 470; 2002 WL 1880105
LEVAL, Circuit Judge. These are consolidated appeals from judgments of the United States District *473Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakoff, Judge) dismissing two putative class actions for forum non conveniens. Plaintiffs are residents of the Oriente region of Ecuador and an adjoining area in Peru. Defendant is Texaco, Inc. (“Texaco”), a
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-08-16 · Published · cited 59× · 303 F.3d 470; 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20010; 157 Oil & Gas Rep. 33; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540
303 F.3d 470 Maria AGUINDA, Individually, and as guardians for Gesica Grefa, Carlos Grefa, Individually and as guardians for Gresica Grefa, Gesica Grefa, Catarina Aguinda, Mercedes Grefa, Lidia Aguinda; Patricio Chimbo, Individually and as guardian for his minor children, Elias Piyaguaje, Individually and as guardian for Lola Piyaguaje, Edicon Piyaguaje, Paulina Piyaguaje, Jimena Piyaguaje and Elias Piyaguaje, Lola Piyaguaje, Edison Piyaguaje, Paul
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008-06-28 · Published · cited 17× · 565 F. Supp. 2d 343; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53408; 2008 WL 2745181
(2008) Dilian CASTRO-MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMMERCIAL CO., et als., Defendants. Civ. No. 04-2274 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 28, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Dilian Castro Medina (hereinafter "Plaintiff or "Castro") filed this action under
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2020-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-18-00030-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MONICA MELISSA PATTERSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 370th District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969-02-24 · Published · cited 14× · 402 F.2d 571
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: The indictment in this case reads as follows: “On or about the 4th day of June, 1966, within the District of Arizona, CHARLES MULL, an Indian, and on the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously, without just cause or excuse, upon the perso
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under
Wise v. Wattspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917-01-08 · Published · cited 1× · 239 F. 207; 152 C.C.A. 195; 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2203
ROSS, Circuit Judge. This suit was commenced in the court below on the 23d day of June, 1914, by Cornelius C. Watts and Dabney C T. Davis, Jr., to quiet title to a tract of land containing 99,289.39 acres, situate in what was formerly the territory of New Mexico, but what is now Santa Cruz county in the state of Arizona. The defendants answered, and it was stipulated by and between the respective parties, among other things, “tha