Cases

Case: 24-20495 Document: 64-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/22/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-20495 ____________

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 853.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry Burgess appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

KHOUZAM, Judge. The State of Florida appeals, and Tomas Burgess cross-appeals, an order granting in part and denying in part Burgess’s motion for discharge. The order dismissed three of six pending charges based on the trial court’s conclusion that Burgess had not waived his right to a speedy trial by the time the State filed a superseding information. But because the record refle

171 B.R. 395 (1994) In the Matter of Tammy Sue MARTIN, Debtor. Opal Jean BURGESS f/k/a Opal Jean Smithey, Plaintiff, v. Tammy Sue MARTIN, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 93-81751. Adv. No. 93-80157. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 9, 1994. *396 Curtis Whitmore, Curtis Whitmore, P.C., Huntsvil

323 S.W.3d 859 (2010) James Lindell McWHIRT, Appellant, v. William BURGESS, et al., Respondents. No. WD 71120. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 9, 2010. James L. McWhirt, Appellant pro se, for appellant. Caroline M. Coulter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondents. Division One: JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., MARK PFEIFFER, and CYNTHIA L.

715 S.E.2d 867 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Stanley Brian BURGESS. No. COA11-193. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 20, 2011. *868 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Lisa G. Corbett, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Kathleen M. Joyce, Assistant Appellate Defen

631 F.Supp.2d 280 (2009) Herbert BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. James T. CONWAY, Lisa Trapasso, Vance Hawley, Selen Abassey, Gerald Coniglio, Defendants. No. 08-CV-6582L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. July 7, 2009. *281 Herbert Burgess, Attica, NY, pro se. Thomas J. Kidera, Debra A. Martin, New York State Attorney G

(2008) Arthur BURGESS, Petitioner, v. Thomas K. BELL, Respondent. Case No. 07-11367. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 26, 2008. ORDER DENYING THE RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Through counsel, the petitioner, Arthur Burgess, a state

CALABRIA, Judge. Rhonda F. Burgess (“plaintiff’) appeals an order entered 10 May 2005 granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Alan L. Rosen, M.D., and Capital Radiology Associates, P.A. (collectively “Dr. Rosen”). We reverse. On 29 November 2001, plaintiff took a pregnancy test in the medical office where she worked and tested positive. Later that same day, she experienced abdominal discomfort and

642 S.E.2d 41 (2007) ROQUEMORE v. BURGESS. No. S06A2014. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 5, 2007. *42 Martin L. Fierman, Eatonton, for Appellant. Donald W. Huskins, Huskins Law Firm, LLP, Eatonton, for Appellee. BENHAM, Justice. William D. Roquemore and Sandra C. Burgess were divorced in September 2002. In

639 S.E.2d 68 (2007) STATE of North Carolina v. Terry J. BURGESS aka Terry Joel Cooper Burgess. No. COA05-1529. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 2, 2007. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Chris Z. Sinha, for the State. M. Alexander Charns, Durham, for Defendant-Appellant. McGEE, Judge. Terry J. Burgess (Defend

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED. Edward Burgess, pro se, appeals from a March 21, 2003 order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.), dismissing Burgess’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim on summary judgment. We assume that the parties are familiar with

Malone, C.J.: Michael R. Martin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Specifically, Martin argues that the district court erred when it classified his two 1990 Kansas juvenile adjudications for burglary as person felonies for criminal history purposes, resulting in an illegal sentence. Martin claims he is entitled to relief under our Kansas S

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Following a jury trial, Petitioner Mark Alan Burgess was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that the state trial court committed various constitutional violations that tainted his conviction. The district court denied

(2008) AMARI COMPANY, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, et al., Plaintiff, v. John R. BURGESS, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 1425. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 7, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTIN C. ASHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs, Amari Company, Inc., et al., h

82 F.2d 321 (1936) MARTIN v. BURGESS.[*] No. 7938. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 20, 1936. *322 S. C. Mize, of Gulfport, Miss., and Harry H. Smith, of Mobile, Ala., for appellant. Jesse F. Hogan, of Mobile, Ala., for appellee. Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges. S

Fifth Amendment Takings Claim; Motion to Dismiss Under RCFC 12(b)(1); Subject Matter Jurisdiction OPINION CAMPBELL-SMITH, Judge Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules for the United State Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). See ECF No. 11. Def

Case: 22-11172 Document: 317-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-11172 FILED