Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Martin v. Moss”
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 5, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-01033-CV HOLLY BONE-MARTIN AND BRIAN DENNIS MARTIN, Appellants V. DAVID TYLER MOSS AND FIDELISSIMUS, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Order entered February 16, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00439-CV HOLLY BONE-MARTIN AND BRIAN MARTIN, Appellants V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Order entered October 31, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00439-CV HOLLY BONE-MARTIN AND BRIAN MARTIN, Appellants V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas C
Moss v. Martinpublic domain
614 F.3d 707 (2010) William H. MOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy MARTIN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-1567. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 11, 2010. Decided August 2, 2010. *708 John Edward Kerley (argued), Kerley & Associates, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff-Appel
Holly Bone A/K/A Holly Martin v. David Tyler Mosspublic domain
Affirm and Opinion Filed February 17, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00436-CV HOLLY BONE, Appellant and Relator V. DAVID TYLER MOSS and FIDELISSIMUS LLC, Appellees and Real Parties in Interest On Appeal from t
Holly Bone A/K/A Holly Martin v. David Tyler Mosspublic domain
Order entered November 22, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00436-CV HOLLY BONE A/K/A HOLLY MARTIN, Appellant V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Holly Bone A/K/A Holly Martin v. David Tyler Mosspublic domain
Order entered June 30, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00436-CV HOLLY BONE A/K/A HOLLY MARTIN, Appellant V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County
Holly Bone A/K/A Holly Martin v. David Tyler Mosspublic domain
Order entered July 2, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00436-CV HOLLY BONE A/K/A HOLLY MARTIN, Appellant V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texa
Holly Bone A/K/A Holly Martin v. David Tyler Mosspublic domain
Order entered October 1, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00436-CV No. 05-21-00803-CV HOLLY BONE A/K/A HOLLY MARTIN, Appellant V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial Distri
Holly Bone A/K/A Holly Martin v. David Tyler Mosspublic domain
Order entered July 30. 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00436-CV HOLLY BONE A/K/A HOLLY MARTIN, Appellant V. DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Tex
Moss v. Princippublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This case sits at the unusual intersection of federal subject-matter jurisdiction and a district court's exercise of its discretion to dismiss a partnership as a dispensable party when all its partners were parties in the case. We conclude that the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction to try the case and did not err in dismissing a nondiverse partnership as dispensable, nor err in it
Moss, William H. v. Martin, Timothypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-3689 WILLIAM H. MOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIMOTHY MARTIN, ROBERT MILLETTE, and BRIAN PIERSMA, Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District
Cherry-El v. Martinpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DWANE CHERRY-EL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-3456 (RDM) v. SABRINA MARTIN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Sabrina Martin and Arturo Vazquez, whom he describes as “man
Moss v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BUSH, Judge. This military retirement pay dispute is before the court on defendant’s motion for partial dismissal, under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and on defendant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record, under RCFC 52.1.1 These motions have been fully briefed, and oral argument was neither
BAUER, Circuit Judge. William Moss brought this civil rights action against Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) employees Timothy Martin, Robert Millette, and Brian Piersma, seeking monetary and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988. Moss alleges that he was fired from his position as the IDOT’s Chief of the Highway Sign Shop because of his political affi
Stone v. Mosspublic domain
By Judge Everett A. Martin, Jr. The plaintiff alleges he owns real estate known as “Lot 27, Block 11, on the north side of West 42nd Street” and that he formerly owned an undivided one-half interest in the adjoining lot 26; it appears two brothers and ten nieces and nephews owned the other one-half interest in lot 26. The plaintiff also alleges the defendant was negligent in the manner in which he gave notice of a sale of lot
Nichols v. Mosspublic domain
By Judge Everett A. Martin, Jr. This personal injury arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on or about October 3, 2001. The plaintiff first filed suit (At Law No. L032216) on October 3,2003. It does not appear that service of process was ever effected, and the plaintiff suffered a nonsuit on March 16,2005. On September 16, 2005, the plaintiff filed the current action and requested the prepara
George Moss v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION VAIDIK, Chief Judge. Case Summary In April 2013 George Moss and accomplice Todd Ruffin forced their way into Philip Potenza and Randall Peterman’s home. The men robbed the roommates at gunpoint and shot Peterman in the leg. Moss was convicted of burglary, two counts of robbery, criminal confinement, and carrying a handgun wit
Dones v. Mosspublic domain
SILBERMAN, Judge. Martin Dones, M.D., and Morton Plant/ Mease Primary Care, Inc., challenge the trial court’s order granting a new trial to Roberta Moss, personal representative of the estate of Steven Michael Moss. The trial court granted a new trial based on two evidentiary rulings that it had made during trial. Because the record does not demonstrate that the rulings substantially prejudiced Ms. Moss, resulting in a miscarr
TRUSTCASH HOLDINGS, INC. v. Mosspublic domain
668 F.Supp.2d 650 (2009) TRUSTCASH HOLDINGS, INC., Dylan Callum, Tyee Capital Consultants, Inc., Jill Carasquero, and Kent Carasquero, Plaintiffs, v. Gregory MOSS and Ayuda Funding Corp., Defendants. Civ. No. 08-5284 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 12, 2009. *651 Gregory Bartko, Esq., (admitted pro ha