Cases

*983 Egan Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J.), entered June 4, 2015 in Schoharie County, which, among other things, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of the Schoharie County Dep

GLADIS, Judge: Appellant was convicted pursuant to his pleas by a general court-martial sitting with members, of conspiracy to commit larceny, sale of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and sale and use of heroin and an amphetamine in violation of Articles 81 and 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 892, and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 5 years and reduction to pay grade E-l. A substitute convening au

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA JASON DONALD SIMPSON, A.K.A. JASON DONALD SIMPSON, SR., Petitioner, V. HONORABLE PHEMONIA MILLER, JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Respondent Commissioner, STATE OF ARIZONA, Real

In re State Roofing Company, Inc.; — Defendant; . Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 640-361; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-497. Not considered; not timely filed. See State v. Crandell, 05-1060 (La.3/10/06), 924 So.2d 122; Morris v. Stueben, 01-0137 (La.3/16/01), 781 So.2d 1220.

OPINION BEEZER, Circuit Judge: Crandell petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. He alleges that he was faced with an unconstitutional choice of incompetent counsel or no counsel at all. We previously held that Crandell’s petition asserted facts sufficient to state a claim and remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing. Crandell

265 S.W.2d 846 (1954) CRANDELL v. GARZA et al. No. 12640. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. February 24, 1954. Rehearing Denied March 17, 1954. *847 Perkins, Floyd & Davis, Kenneth Oden, Alice, for appellant. Lloyd & Lloyd, Alice, for appellees. W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice. <

JUSTICE BOLICK, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Arizona’s Constitution and laws forbid bail for defendants accused of sexual conduct with a minor under age fifteen when the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant committed the crime. Because that prohibition is not narrowly focused to protect public safety, we hold that it violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process guarantee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paula Xinis, United States District Judge Ralph Chidi Jarpa (“Petitioner” or “Mr. Jarpa”) is currently being detained by the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“DHS/ICE”)1 at the Worcester County Detention Center in Snow Hill, Maryland, under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). ECF No. 1 at 3. On July 1, 2016,

*63 Opinion NICHOLSON, J. Defendant Michael Anthony Cruz entered a negotiated plea of no contest to driving with a 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level or higher and causing injury (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced him to the agreed-upon term of 16 months in state pri

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ROBERT LOUIS HISKETT, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE RICK LAMBERT, Judge of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, in and for the County of MOHAVE, Respondent Judge, STATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. MATTHEW J. SMITH, MOHAVE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Real Party in Interest.

Filed 1/7/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT THE PEOPLE, B301093 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA465222) v. ERNEST JIM CHOI, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles C

Opinion CHIN, J. In this case we consider under what circumstances a trial court is obligated to conduct a hearing on whether to discharge counsel and appoint *84 new counsel when a criminal defendant indicates a desire to withdraw a guilty or no contest plea on the ground that cu

YEGAN, Acting P.J. *974 Stephen Debouver, a career criminal with 26 different aliases, knows his way around a police station. He also knows his way around a courtroom. This time, he was convicted by jury of first degree residential burglary with a "person present" finding. (Pen. Code, §§ 459

JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Persons charged with sexual assault must not be released on bail if they pose a danger of committing new sexual assaults or other dangerous crimes while awaiting trial. The question here is how this may be accomplished in a manner that furthers this public-safety goal while preserving an accused's constitutionally guaranteed liberty interest.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM JENNINGS CHOYCE, Defendant and Appellant. S169090 San Joaquin County Superior Court SF98079A July 21, 2025 Justice Evans authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justic

CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 We here consider whether Arizona students granted deferred removal action by the United States Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") under its Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") policy are eligible for in-state college tuition. "The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration a

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: Appellant, Joan Orie Melvin (“Orie Melvin”), filed an Application for Stay of Criminal Sentence Requiring Appellant to Write Letters of Apology Pending Disposition of this Direct Appeal (hereinafter, the “Application for Stay”), in which she contends that the portion of her criminal sentence requiring her to write apology letters to the victims of her crimes violates her right against

ORDER DALE A. DROZD, United States Magistrate Judge: Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered against him on December 17, 2003 in the Sacramento County S

NORRIS, Judge, specially concurring: ¶ 48 The first pivotal issue in this appeal is whether the AAG had standing to sue MCCCD for the declaratory and injunctive relief it requested. See supra ¶7.1 agree with the majority the AAG had standing to pursue the requested declaratory and injunctive relief against MCCCD. Thus, I concur in the majority’s decision at ¶¶ 7-11. ¶ 49 The secon

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD KENNETH DJERF, No. 08-99027 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:02-cv-00358-JAT CHARLES L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding