Cases

23-721-cv Suluki v. Credit One Bank, NA UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: June 26, 2024 Decided: May 28, 2025) Docket No. 23-721-cv KHALILAH SULUKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

CHIN, Circuit Judge: These appeals, heard in tandem, challenge two separate judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J., and Sullivan, /.), in favor of defendants-appellees TD Bank, N.A. (“TD Bank”) and Capital One Bank, N.A. (“Capital One”), respectively, dismissing plaintiffs’ claims that the banks violated (1) Articl

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Charlene Martinez brings this putative class action against Defendants TD Bank USA, N.A. (“TD Bank”) and Target Corporation (“Target”), alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227; the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“RFDCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788-1788.33; and California

Filed 2/9/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN KUMCHAI KIM MIYAHARA, B317726 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV44166) v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00470-CV WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant v. Shaun L. WESEMANN, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00472-CV WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant v. Robert D. RUBALCABA, Appellee

IKB Intl., S.A. v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2022 NY Slip Op 05058) IKB Intl., S.A. v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 2022 NY Slip Op 05058 Decided on August 30, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 102A20-3 Filed 22 March 2024 CHESTER TAYLOR III, RONDA and BRIAN WARLICK, LORI MENDEZ, LORI MARTINEZ, CRYSTAL PRICE, JEANETTE and ANDREW ALESHIRE, MARQUITA PERRY, WHITNEY WHITESIDE, KIMBERLY STEPHAN, KEITH PEACOCK, ZELMON MCBRIDE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2021) from the decision of a divided panel of th

PNC Bank, N.A. v Steinhardt (2018 NY Slip Op 02174) PNC Bank, N.A. v Steinhardt 2018 NY Slip Op 02174 Decided on March 28, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GLOBALTRANZ ENTERPRISES, ) INC., ) ) C.A. No. N19C-09-144 MAA Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PNC BANK, N.A., ) )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells” or “plaintiff’), as Trustee of the Sovereign Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust, 2007-C1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C1 (the “Trust”), acting by and through the Trust’s Sub-Special Servicer, Water-stone Asset Management, LLC (“Water-stone”), brings two related actions for bre

Judge Chin dissents in a separate opinion. BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: *154 John Doe is a judgment creditor who seeks attachment and turnover of electronic fund transfers (" EFTs ") initiated by sanctioned foreign terrorist organizations w

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of a suit by defaulting borrowers who seek to assign fault to the manner in which a creditor foreclosed on its collateral, in this instance a multimillion dollar home located on Martha’s Vineyard. For the following reasons, we reject the borrowers’ fusillade of ehal-lenges to the creditor’s conduct, except that we find that the credi

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Elizabeth A. Willis brought this action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) for violation of the California Homeowner’s Bill of Rights (“HBOR”) and negligence arising out defendant’s alleged mishandling of plaintiffs loan modification requests. The matter is now before the court on defendant’s Motion t

*598Opinion and Order Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss counts I-VI and VIII of the plaintiffs’ consolidated amended class action complaint (“CAC”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (ECF No. 53.) For the reasons set forth in this order

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Virk (2020 NY Slip Op 04930) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Virk 2020 NY Slip Op 04930 Decided on September 16, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

*1319 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief filed August 8, 2013 (Doc. No. 23). Having conside

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Wells Fargo’s predecessor in interest extended a loan to Tina Alexander, secured by a deed of trust on her homestead, as permitted under the Texas Constitution Article XVI, Section 50. Alexander-fell into default and Wells Fargo initiated foreclosure. Alexander then brought this action, alleging nonconformity with the requirements for forecl

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Stefan R. Underhill, United States District Judge This case arises out of a mortgage refinancing agreement between Allyson Smith and Wells Fargo, N.A. Smith seeks to enforce her right to rescission under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq., and receive damages for Wells Fargo’s failure to honor her request for rescission. Smith also

By Judge Mary Jane Hall This matter comes before the Court on demurrers filed by each defendant to the Complaint herein. The respective positions and multiple grounds in support of demurrer were extensively briefed and thoroughly addressed in oral argument. The Court sustains the demurrers on one ground only. The Court rules as a matter of law that the underlying transaction by which HSBC Bank acquired rights to Plaintiff’s