Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Marts v. United States”
Marts v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Marts v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Marts v. Inchpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Marts v. Bellpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Marts v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marts v. Martspublic domain
[Cite as Marts v. Marts, 2025-Ohio-3196.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY BRET MARTS, CASE NO. 2025-P-0004 Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas, Domestic R
399 B.R. 400 (2009) In re UNI-MARTS, LLC, Debtor. Charan Trading Corp. and Varni, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Uni-Marts, LLC and Henry D. Sahakian, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-11037 (MFW). Adversary No. 08-51239 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 12, 2009. *404 Eric M. Sutty, Mary E. Augustine, Bayard, P.A.
JNA-1 Corp. v. Uni-Marts, LLC (In Re Uni-Marts, LLC)public domain
404 B.R. 767 (2009) In re UNI-MARTS, LLC, et al., Debtors. JNA-1 Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Uni-Marts, LLC and Henry D. Sahakian, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-11037 (MFW). Adversary No. 08-51863 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. April 29, 2009. *773 Eric M. Sutty, Esquire, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE
Kesar, Inc. v. Uni-Marts, LLC (In Re Uni-Marts, LLC)public domain
405 B.R. 113 (2009) In re UNI-MARTS, LLC, et al., Debtors. Kesar, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Uni-Marts, LLC and Henry D. Sahakian, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-11037 (MFW). Adversary No. 08-51864 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. April 28, 2009. *119 Eric M. Sutty, Esquire, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE, Char
FAGG, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Under the independent source doctrine, a court cannot suppress evidence gathered in a warrant search following an illegal entry if the warrant was issued on information from sources unrelated to the entry and the illegal entry did not contribute to the discovery of the evidence seized under the warrant. Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 799, 814-15, 104 S.Ct. 3
Marts v. Fotipublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marts v. Hinespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marts v. Edwardspublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marts v. Edwardspublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mega Marts, Inc. v. Trevisan (In Re Trevisan)public domain
300 B.R. 708 (2003) In re Leah D. TREVISAN, Debtor. Mega Marts, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Leah D. Trevisan, Defendant, Roundy's Inc., Plaintiff, v. Leah D. Trevisan, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-32158, Adversary Nos. 03-2210, 03-2211. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 14, 2003. *709
Green v. United Statespublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Mart Green, as Trustee of the David and Barbara Green 1993 Dynasty Trust (the Trust), filed this action seeking a refund of federal income taxes paid by the Trust for the taxable year ending December 31, 2004. At issue is the amount of the charitable deduction that the Trust may take pursuant to
United States v. Martspublic domain
PER CURIAM: The judgments of conviction are affirmed. One point on appeal is that certain products of an unreasonable search were exhibited to the jury and alluded to in the oral testimony of witnesses. Chimel v. United States, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685, was handed down midway in the trial, so as a caution the government abandoned its intent to offer the objects. But under our subsequ
Marte v. United Statespublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By indictment filed on October 30, 2003, the Government charged Andres Marte (“Marte”) with one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (“Count One”) among other charges. On August 24, 2005, Marte pled guilty to Count One pursuant to a written plea agreement
Marte v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Green v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge. This is a tax refund action arising from the internal revenue laws of the United States. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 37, Plaintiff, and 38, Defendant]. Defendant has responded to Plaintiffs motion [Doc. No. 42], and Plaintiff has responded to Defendant’s motion [Doc. No. 43]; Plaintiff has filed a Reply in su