Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2017 Term FILED No. 16-0136 May 26, 2017 Released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

959 So.2d 308 (2007) Theron D. HOWARD, Jr., individually and as guardian of Elizabeth Howard, Anthony Howard, and Thomas Howard, Appellants, v. Steven Vern RISCH, JR Distributors, and Michael Workman, Appellees. No. 2D06-2572. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 11, 2007. Rehearing Denied July 6, 2007.

325 S.C. 560 (1997) 482 S.E.2d 582 David G. VOSS, Claimant, Respondent, v. RAMCO, INC., Employer, and U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Carrier, Appellants. No. 2627. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard December 4, 1996. Decided January 27, 1997. Rehearing Denied March 20, 1997.

538 F.3d 272 (2008) David CHIN; Kevin L. Sullivan; Marvin Kirschenbaum; Bruce McCutcheon; Debra Dodge; Kevin L. Dodge; Howard Barkan; Bessie Coyne; George Higgins; Julie Szabos; Jim Coffey; Claude Meyer; Susan Robins; Al Zeidler; Fran Strykowski; Jeff Bradley; Jerry Green; Tony Sanchez; Kenneth E. Nealy; Craig M. Dinsmore; David *273 P. Yexley; Ed Mikoloajczyk; Martha Singleton; Calvin M. Singleton; Howard G. Saul; Sc

MAYER, Chief Judge. International Nutrition Company (“INC”) appeals the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut holding that (1) Horphag Research Ltd. (“Horphag”) and numerous other defendants are not liable for infringement of United States Patent No. 4,698,360 (“'360 patent”) directed to a “[p]lant extract with a proanthocyanidins content as therapeutic agent having radical sc

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2022 Term _______________ June 14, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 21-0729 SUPREME

PER CURIAM. Robert G. McGowan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on a multi-plaintiff 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint filed by McGowan and over three hundred other inmates. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blackburn v. Moore, No. CA-99-102 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 28

MARVIN, Chief Judge. In this action arising out of an alleged defectively designed and constructed addition to the LSU Medical Center in Shreveport, the State, as owner, appeals a 1990 judgment dismissing, on an exception of one year liberative prescription, its demands against the mechanical engineering firm, Bovay Engineers, Inc., who was hired by the architects of the project to design and construct the heating, ventila

305 S.C. 406 (1991) 409 S.E.2d 368 William C. CROCKER, Petitioner v. Reverend Ernest BARR, Billy Boggs, Larry Brown, Emory Brown, Henry Manning, Jr., Wayne Whidby, Reverend Virgil Manning, Thomas Stroud, Wendel Boggs, James B. Reynolds, Sandy Hilly, Melvin Crider, and Howard Powell, individually and as present or former board members of the Calhoun Falls Pentecostal Holiness Church, Respondents. 23469

Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-7-2008 Chin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp Precedential or No

9 F.3d 849 William T. USELTON; W.D. Hupp; C.J. Dowling; KennethMiles; G.D. Jeffcoat; Jack Wilson; K.D. Witt; PaulaRosa; Johnny S. Hunt; James A. Mason; Robert E. Stuart;Jerry Don Casey; Maurice Uhrmacher; Loyd A. Duncan;Vernon Jordan; Hubert D. Williamson; J.W. Haris; D.L.Haralson; Harvey Leo Hess; Wood G. Ishmael; Harold W.Summers; Charles E. Stockton; Joe C. Gray; Earl G.Jackson; E.L. Whilhock; M

897 A.2d 810 (2006) 392 Md. 436 Mary A. CONTEH v. Ansu Z. CONTEH. No. 104, September Term, 2003. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 4, 2006. Thomas L. Harlow, Rockville, for appellant. Alice Pare-Johnson (Law Offices of Alice Pare-Johnson, Germantown, on brief), for appellee. Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARR

257 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001) INTERNATIONAL NUTRITION COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTv.HORPHAG RESEARCH LTD., MW INTERNATIONAL, INC., KAIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND NOW FOODS, AND TRACO LABS, INC., AND CHEMCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AND GREATER CONTINENTS, INC., AND TWIN LABORATORIES, INC., AND USANA, INC., AND FREE LIFE INTERNATIONAL LTD., AND ENZYMATIC THERAPY, INC. AND INDENA U.S.A., AND NUTRACEUTICAL CORPORATION, AND ARKOPHARMA, INC., AND JARRO

Filed 2/26/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 24 Gayln L. Olson, Bradley L. Nelson, Rebecca L. Harstad, Keith Abrahamson, Joann Allard, Deborah A. Ambuehl, Gertrude E. Anderson, Ro

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 642 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 643 Appellant, Ohio Savings Bank ("the bank") appeals from the summary judgment granted by the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Pro

319 So.2d 534 (1975) Emily Harrison FRANCIS, Administratrix of Succession and Tutrix of minor v. GERLACH MEAT COMPANY, INC. No. 12681. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 3, 1975. Rehearing Denied October 1, 1975. *535 Lunn, Irion, Switzer, Johnson & Salley by Richard H. Switzer, Shrevepor

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Appellant, John Lomelo, convicted on several counts of mail fraud and extortion, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Lome-lo was convicted on eight counts of a twelve count indictment. The jury found him guilty on one count of conspiring to commit mail fraud in viola

964 F.2d 1391 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1497, 121 Lab.Cas.P 35,640 Marvin O. WILSON, Jr., John A. Auten, III, Terry L. Austin,Phillip A. Johnston, Wendell M. Jolly, Jr., Sebron L.Thompson, Harvey W. James, Jr., Robert L. Honeycutt, HowardDarrell Key, Thomas Richard Craft, Steven L. Ridge, OscarWilliam White, Billy Wayne Oliver, Harry A. Rogers, DickNewhouse, Tommy R. Wilburn, Charles E. Melto

SANDSTROM, Justice, dissenting. [¶ 43] I respectfully dissent. [¶ 44] There is no dispute that the purpose of S.B. 2354 before the 1981 Legislative Assembly was to deny unemployment benefits when it is the claimant’s work that is stopped — not necessarily all of the employer’s work that is stopped — because of a labor dispute. There is also no dispute that the law was not to deny unemployment ben

38 F.Supp.2d 1306 (1995) Roger W. KREIMEYER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. Civ. 92-NC-088S. United States District Court, D. Utah, Northern Division. November 22, 1995. *1307 *1308 Fred R. Silvester, Silvester & Conroy, Salt Lake City, Utah, Claudia F. Be