Cases

61 Ill. App.2d 395 (1965) 209 N.E.2d 868 Mary Alice Owen, Administrator of the Estate of Decius Owen, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willett Truck Leasing Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Gen. No. 50,024. Illinois Appellate Court — First District, First Division. July 30, 1965. Rehearing denied August 16, 1965.

895 S.W.2d 352 (1995) Sharon P. THOMAS and Alice McNeal, Petitioners, v. Howard OLDHAM and City of Houston, Respondents. Daniel GIBSON, Petitioner, v. Candace Katamay SPINKS, Respondent. Nos. D-4559, 94-0207. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued September 21, 1994. Decided March 16, 1995. *354 Alan D. Bynum

307 S.W.3d 762 (2010) DEL LAGO PARTNERS, INC. and Del Lago Partners, L.P., Doing Business Under the Assumed Name of Del Lago Golf Resort & Conference Center, and BMC-The Benchmark Management Company, Petitioners, v. Bradley SMITH, Respondent. No. 06-1022. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued December 6, 2007. Decided April 2, 2010.

142 F.Supp.2d 343 (2000) TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA, Defendant, Town of Cheektowaga, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., CIGNA Property & Casualty Ins. Co., Maryland Casualty Co., the Travelers Insurance Company and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Third Party Defendants. No. 97-CV-0546A. United States District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0589 444444444444 IN RE ALLCAT CLAIMS SERVICE, L.P. AND JOHN WEAKLY, RELATORS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

27 Mass. App. Ct. 398 (1989) 539 N.E.2d 65 WILLIAM D. DELANEY vs. CHIEF OF POLICE OF WAREHAM & another.[1] No. 88-P-766. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Plymouth. April 13, 1989. May 31, 1989. Present: GREANEY, C.J., ARMSTRONG, & KASS, JJ. Philip N. Beauregard (Richard E. Burke, Jr., wi

370 S.E.2d 296 (1988) COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, ex rel., etc. v. Marie EDWARDS. MEDICAID FRAUD CONTROL UNIT, etc. v. John DOE, et al. Record Nos. 850967, 850456. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 10, 1988. *297 H. Elizabeth Shaffer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (H. Lane Kneedler, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., John B. Russell, Jr., Sr. A

216 B.R. 237 (1997) In re Amy Elizabeth STOCKARD and Jonathan C. Stockard, Debtors. PROVIDIAN BANCORP f/d/b/a First Deposit National Bank, Plaintiff, v. Amy Elizabeth STOCKARD, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 396-11584, Adversary No. 397-0165A. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee. December 16, 1997. *238 Melissa M. Kurtz

ACCEPTED 04-14-00124-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/9/2015 7:31:18 PM

Dunbar, J. This is an action in ejectment to recover lots 1 to lOj. both inclusive, lots 11 and 12, and lots 25 and 26, all in block 91, Parker’s Addition to the town of Kalama. The complaint charges that the plaintiff was the owner and lawfully possessed of said property, and that the defendants unlawfully entered into the possession of said premises and ousted the plaintiff, and unlawfully withhold the possession thereof from

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 10-2204 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., Defendants, Appellants. ________________________ Nos. 10-2207 & 10-2214 DEAN HARA, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-A

Stegall, J., dissenting: This case is not only about abortion policy -the most divisive social issue of our day-it is more elementally about the structure of our republican form of government. Which is to say, this case is about the proper conditions for just rule. At bottom, this case is about finding and drawing the sometimes elusive line between law and arbitrary exercises of power. Here we venture onto a bat

36 P.3d 634 (2001) Edmond CRITTELL and Elma Crittell, Appellants, v. Laura BINGO, Thomas Bingo, Alice Masuyama, Colleen Nishiyama, Elaine Sakaitani, and Leatrice Takeuchi, Interested Parties, and the Estate of Violet M.B. Houssien, Deceased, Appellees. No. S-9468. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 9, 2001. Rehearing Denied December 21, 2001.

DOROTHY FORBES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. MARY B. FORBES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. ALLAN FORBES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RE

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. These appeals present constitutional challenges to section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), 1 U.S.C. § 7, which denies federal economic and other benefits to same-sex couples lawfully married in Massachusetts and to surviving spouses from couples thus married. Rather than challenging the right of states to define marriage as they see fit, the appeals contest the right of Congress to undercut the

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4240941 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

On the 8th day of February, 1915, Gertie Schultz instituted suit against Frederick C. Tanner in the district court of Harper county, state of Oklahoma, No. 902, to cancel a certain deed of conveyance to lands in Harper county occupied by the defendant, Frederick C. Tanner, plaintiff alleging that the deed under which the defendant held the property was a forgery, and asking that same be canceled. The record discloses that Frederick C. Tanner, the defendant herein, was the son of Mary E. Tanne

The record herein is somewhat involved and the questions presented for our decision are unusual. However, the decisive question is clearly presented, namely, whether Hon. L.R. Sheets, Judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Marshalltown, was properly designated by the judges of the district court for the seventeenth judicial district to act as judge of the juvenile court in Marshall County, pursuant to section 3607 of the Code, 1939. The questions herein arise upon appeal from a de

Opinion op the Court by Judge Nunn Affirming. The issue involved on this appeal is the construction of the will of W. Gr. Berry. The controversy is between appellants, Thomas and Alice Duncan, devisees hut not heirs of W. Gr. Berry, and his legal heirs. The will is as follows: “I, W. Gr. Berry being of sound mind and disposing, memory do ordain and publish this as my last wil

*466SIMPSON, Justice. This record has been read and considered in general consultation and the court has concluded to' this result. The appeal challenges the decree of the circuit court, in equity, allowing appellee Keith fees and expenses for services rendered by him as an attorney at law to the estate of Alice DeVane King, deceased.