Cases

639 F.Supp.2d 1038 (2009) In re MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. C 08-00832 JW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. July 16, 2009. *1040 Laurence M. Rosen, Phillip P. Kim, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., New York, NY, Lionel Z. Glancy, Peter Arthur Binkow, Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Ariel Cervantes Anguiano filed this action under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 ("FOIA"), seeking 12 categories of documents from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency ("ICE") for purposes of a motion to suppress

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., NATERA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees DNA DIAGNOSTICS CENTER, INC., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee v. SEQUENOM, INC., SEQUENOM CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE, LLC, Defendants-Appellants ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED, Defendant ____________

Opinion RUVOLO, P. J. I. INTRODUCTION Christine Diamond was injured while riding as a passenger in a taxi that was involved in a collision with another car. Diamond and her husband, Andrew (the Diamonds), brought a negligence action against the drivers and owners of each vehicle. The Diamonds settled their

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: Appellant Jimmie Lee Kennedy appeals from his conviction by a jury of robbery and weapons offenses on the grounds that the district court erred in imposing five life sentences. He contends that the robbery convictions under the Hobbs Act could not constitute the basis for life im

Filed 9/17/15 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CHRISTINE DIAMOND et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, A139251 v. (San Francisco City & County SERGE RESHKO et al.,

107 Cal.Rptr.2d 270 (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 389 Asha BAHL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant and Respondent. No. G022816. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. May 23, 2001. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 20, 2001. *273 Nick O'Malley, Santa Ana, for

63 Cal.App.4th 1128 (1998) RENA WEEKS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BAKER & McKENZIE et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. A068499. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. May 4, 1998. *1136 COUNSEL Robert M. Vantress, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr

160 F.Supp.2d 421 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, v. K, Defendant. No. 00-CR-951 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 31, 2001. *422 Loretta Lynch, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, By Noah B. Perlman, Esq., for the United States of America. Arthur L. Aidala, Brooklyn,

Opinion BROWN, J.— “In the history of this Court and this country, few questions have been more divisive than those arising from governmental action taken on the basis of race.” (Fullilove v. Klutznick (1980) 448 U.S. 448, 516 [100 S.Ct. 2758, 2794, 65 L.Ed.2d 902] (conc. opn. of Powell, J.); see also DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974) 416 U.S

74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510 (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128 Rena WEEKS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BAKER & McKENZIE et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. A068499. Court of Appeal, First District, Division One. May 4, 1998. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 2, 1998. Review Denied August 26, 1998.[*]