Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 177 EAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 236 EAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 156 EAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 167 EAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 168 EAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The receipt of the opinions of two Deputy Sheriffs as to the point of collision between two automobiles based upon the position of the two automobiles after the accident and the location of the debris was error. They were not qualified as experts. Even if they had been, the conclusion was within the competence of the jurors. (Meiselman v. Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N. Y. 389, 396.) However, there

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1069 Filed October 1, 2014 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOHN MICHAEL SACCO, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Arthur E. Gamble, Judge. John Sacco appeals from three convictions, asserting the evidence leading to his arrest an

DYK, Circuit Judge. Geraldine Sacco (“Sacco”) and Karen Vesterby (“Vesterby”) appeal a decision of *1307 the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing, for want of subject matter jurisdiction, their claims for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(l)(A)(ii).

SUPERIOR COURT SZAWLOWSKI POTATO FARMS, INC., AND OTHERS [1] v. JOSEPH E. SZAWLOWSKI, AS THE SPECIAL PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STANLEY E. SZAWLOWSKI, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE STAN AND MARY ELLEN SZAWLOWSKI FAMILY TRUST Docket: 2180CV00021

270 B.R. 382 (2001) In re Robert SACCO and Geraldine Sacco, Debtors. Commercial Money Center, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Robert Sacco, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-26365-MBM. Adversary No. 00-2647-MBM. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 11, 2001. *383 Peter Pross, Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, P

102 F.Supp.2d 382 (1999) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. E.J. SACCO, INC., Defendant. No. 98-CV-75627-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 31, 1999. *383 Ellen G. Ha, Adele Rapport, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Detroit, MI, for plaintiff. Robert M. Ve

BISHOP, J. The plaintiffs, Mary Beth Farrell and Vincent Farrell, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Brian J. Hines, M.D., and Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, LLC (Urogynecology).

99 B.R. 647 (1989) In re Albert SACCO, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 87-1054, Motion No. 88-5368M. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 15, 1989. *648 Michael S. Geisler, Pittsburgh, Pa., for debtor. Mary Reitmeyer, Pittsburgh, Pa., Trustee. Mark S. Seewald, Sable, Makoroff & Libenson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for

409 Mass. 25 (1990) 564 N.E.2d 386 JOHN A. SACCO, executor, & others[1] vs. ARMEN ROUPENIAN. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Plymouth. October 3, 1990. December 26, 1990. Present: WILKINS, ABRAMS, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Barbara L. Moore for the plaintiffs. Peter C. Knight (Thomas M. E

CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge: Herbert Russell Bassette was convicted of capital murder by a jury on August 22, 1980, and was sentenced to death. He appealed his conviction without success to the Supreme Court of Virginia, see Bassette v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 844, 284 S.E.2d 844 (1981). He was also unsuccessful with his petition for certiorari to the United State

Moule, J. We have before us appeals from judgments and orders in two separate but related cases. The first is a negligence action in which plaintiffs, the Joseph E. Sacco estate (Sacco), the Edwin T. Keefe estate (Keefe) and William R. Pelin (Pelin) were awarded damages totaling $249,308.50 against defendants Michael Bodwitch (Bodwitch), John E. Corn-*130well (Cornwell),

473 S.E.2d 110 (1995) 196 W.Va. 395 In the Matter of LINDSEY C. No. 23065. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted October 31, 1995. Decided December 14, 1995. Dissenting Opinion of Justice Workman July 19, 1996. *112 Mary Lee Moore Bizanovich, Wheeling, Guardian ad L

690 N.W.2d 66 (2004) In the Matter of the ESTATE of Helen E. GRAHAM, Deceased. Mary G. Sacco and Julie Ann Jones, Executor of the Estate of Dorothy A. Devore, Appellants, v. Susan A. Richardson, Executor of the Estate of Helen E. Graham, and Susan A. Richardson, Individually, Appellee. No. 03-1817. Supreme Court of Iowa. December 17, 2004.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 20) PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs eighteen-count complaint against thirteen individuals and entities as*298sociated with his former employer, West-field Vocational Technical High School (“WVTHS”), offers two federa

506 S.E.2d 615 (1998) 203 W.Va. 172 William J. HENRY and Ruth Ann Henry, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. James K. BENYO, Defendant Below, Appellee, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Appellant. No. 24015. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 13, 1998. Decided July 13, 1998.