Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mary Ellen Blanchard”
Blanchard v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCpublic domain
306 F.Supp.2d 753 (2004) Lenore BLANCHARD, Lanita Gray, Kenneth Johnson, Christopher Lawson, Debra McCarroll, Bruce Polk, Isabella Smith, Kerry Stewart, and Perry Whiteside, Plaintiffs, v. SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC, Defendant. No. 02 C 2032. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 2, 2004. *754
Blanchard v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BUCKLO, District Judge. Plaintiffs are African-American customers of defendant Speedway Superamerica, LLC (“Speedway”), a gas station chain, who were allegedly obliged to pay for gasoline before filling their tanks (“pre-payment”) while white customers were allowed to fill their tanks and pay afterwards. The plaintiffs seek relief on behalf of themselves and a class
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytlepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/3/2015 2:56:56 PM
Mojica v. Fischerpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Rafael Mojica appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus vacating his 1996 New York State conviction for second degree murder on the ground that the trial court’s jury instruction violated due process by relieving the prosecution of its burden under New York law to disprove his justification defense and depriving Mojica of an effective summation. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the
S.S. v. City of Springfieldpublic domain
MASTROIANNI, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Following this court's rulings denying Defendants' motion to dismiss and denying Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, Defendants filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Defendants assert in their motion, that each of the association plaintiffs, the Parent/Professional Advocacy League ("PPAL") and the Disability Law Center ("DLC"
Nelson v. Board of Equalization of Salt Lake Countypublic domain
943 P.2d 1354 (1997) A. Tom NELSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF SALT LAKE COUNTY, State of Utah, and Utah State Tax Commission, Respondent. No. 960081. Supreme Court of Utah. August 19, 1997. *1355 Ted D. Blanchard, Salt Lake City, for Nelson. Karl L. Hendrickson, Mary Ellen Sloan, Douglas R. Short, Salt Lake C
S.S. ex rel. S.Y. v. City of Springfieldpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE OR LIMIT AND FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (Dkt. Nos. 96, 162, and 171) MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J. I. Introduction Plaintiffs bring this proposed class action on behalf of all students who have been *214diagnosed with m
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: In the instant two appeals, the plaintiff parents of two deceased infant children assert deprivations by the State of Louisiana of constitutional property and liberty interests in the bodies of their dead children pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court dismissed the claims of both the parents of Christina Arnaud and the parents of Kendall Felix
hBROWN, Judge. Scurlock Oil Company (“Scurlock”) was the first purchaser of oil from Maddox and May Brothers Casing Service, Inc. (“M & M”) which operated wells in the Northeast Lisbon Unit (“the Unit”). The owner of the working interest in these wells was Northeast Lisbon Production Company (“Lisbon”). In 1987, Arkla, Inc. d/b/a Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company (“Arkla”), who supplied natural gas to op
Volkman v. Rykerpublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Dwayne Volkman was employed as a casework supervisor at the Lawrence Correctional Center in Illinois when he called the local State’s Attorney to comment on the criminal prosecution of a co-worker for violations of Illinois Law and Department of Corrections policy. After an internal investigation, Volkman received a written reprimand and was suspended for five days. He sued various officials connected
United States v. Leblancpublic domain
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Staff Sergeant CRAIG A. LEBLANC United States Air Force ACM 38396 ____M.J.____ 26 March 2015 Sentence adjudged 14 February 2013 by GCM convened a
Providence Metallizing Co. v. Tristar Products, Inc.public domain
717 F.Supp.2d 227 (2010) PROVIDENCE METALLIZING CO., Plaintiff, v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., New Products International, Inc., and Baruch Tamir, individually and in his corporate capacity as an officer of New Products International, Inc., Defendants. C.A. No. 09-450. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. June 11, 2010. *228
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 11, 2015 Session JOHN HOLMES PEACHER-RYAN, ET AL. v. HEIRS AT LAW OF RUTH JAMES GAYLOR ET AL. Appeal from the Probate Court for Shelby County No. D-14371 Kathleen N. Gomes, Judge No. W2013-02801-COA-R3-CV- Filed April 9, 2015 This is an appeal of the trial court‘s adoption of a sp
Vargas-Cabán v. Caribbean Transportation Servicespublic domain
279 F.Supp.2d 107 (2003) Wanda VARGAS-CABÁN, et al, Plaintiff(s), v. CARIBBEAN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, et al, Defendant(s). No. CIV. 02-1902(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 14, 2003. *108 *109 Rafael A. Oliveras-Lopez, Edif Assoc de Maestros, San Juan, PR, for plain
Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIM CARTER MARTINEZ, on No. 22-35305 behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05725- Plaintiff-Appellee, MJP v. OPINION ZOOMINFO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corpora
Baker v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.public domain
985 S.W.2d 272 (1999) Helen BAKER, Individually and as Appellants the Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Louis Baker, Deceased, and as Next Friend of Her Minor Children, Mitchell Robert Baker and Eloise Ellen Baker, and Suzanne Tomlinson, Individually and as Next Friend of Her Minor Child, Allisa Anne "Kate" Tomlinson, and Julia Kristen Laverack, Giles Kevin Laverack, Neville Murray Laverack, Individually and as the Personal Representatives
Rodgers v. Monumental Life Insurance Companypublic domain
289 F.3d 442 Mary Ellen RODGERS, Individually and as Independent Personal Representative for the Estate of Philip J. Rodgers, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation; and American Express, a New York Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-2241. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued November 29, 2001.
Rodgers v. Monumental Life Insurancepublic domain
OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Mary Ellen Rodgers,1 appeals from the order entered by District Court Judge Victoria A. Roberts, on August 29, 2000, granting Defendants’, Monumental Life Insurance Company’s and American Express’, motion for reconsideration and thereby entering summary judgement in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff also appeals from the order entered by Di
Siniscalchi v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
903 F.Supp. 182 (1995) Patricia SINISCALCHI, et al. v. SHOP-RITE SUPERMARKETS, INC. Civ. A. No. 94-30133-MAP. United States District Court, for the District of Massachusetts. August 23, 1995. *183 Charles R. Casartello, Jr., Pellegrini & Seeley, Springfield, MA, for Patricia Siniscalchi. Richard J. Maloney, Thomas E. S
Elizabeth Hunter v. Usedupublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ELIZABETH HUNTER; VERONICA No. 23-35174 BONIFACIO PENALES; ALEX DURON; ZAYN SILVA; RACHEL D.C. No. 6:21-cv- MOULTON; VICTORIA JOY 00474-AA BACON; HAYDEN BROWN; BROOKE C.; GARY CAMPBELL; TRISTAN CAMPBELL; NATALIE OPINION CARTER; RACHEL HELD; LAUREN HOEKSTRA; CHANDLER HORNING; JONATHAN JONES; ASHTIN MARKOWSKI; CAMERON MARTINEZ; MACKENZIE MCCANN; DARREN MCDON