Cases

¶35 (dissenting) — I do not share the majority’s comfort in viewing attorney Anne Deutscher’s lack of candor to the trial court in isolation from the nature of the sanction putatively imposed as a result. The majority concludes that the trial court properly sanctioned Deutscher for failing to properly disclose when she first learned that Sandra Dickenson might be the nurse who treated Summer Goble, thus learning that Dickenson might be a ke

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0868 Filed March 19, 2025 BRADLEY RAY PIEPER, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. AMANDA MARIE GABEL, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Alan Heavens, Judge. A mother appeals the child-custody determination placing the parties’ minor child in th

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100 (Fla.1955) and § 48.181(3), Fla.Stat. (1985). DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN RE ESTATE OF GABEL NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). IN RE ESTATE OF CHARLES L. GABEL, DECEASED. JAMES L. GABEL, APPELLEE,

146 Ariz. 527 (1985) 707 P.2d 325 Raymond GABEL and Earlyn Gabel, husband and wife; Preston Curtis and Bette Curtis, husband and wife; Erwin Boggs and Ethel H. Boggs, husband and wife; Joseph T. Strickland, a single man; and Paul A. Strickland, a single man, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. T.T. TATUM and Patricia Tatum, husband and wife; Alma Anderson, a single woman; Rayburn L. Anderson, and Jinger Anderson, husband and wife; I

202 P.3d 355 (2009) Ann R. DEUTSCHER, Appellant, v. Jeffrey P. GABEL, D.O., and Jane Doe Gabel; and Providence Health System-Washington, Inc. d/b/a Providence Centralia Hospital, Respondents. No. 58641-6-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. March 2, 2009. Michael King, Carney Badley Spellman, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Appellant. Steven Fitzer, Melanie

MARING, Justice, dissenting. [¶ 23] I respectfully dissent. I believe the trial court did adequately set forth the standard for evaluating the impact of domestic violence on a child custody determination and properly applied that standard. Our Court’s standard for evaluating the impact domestic violence committed by both parents has on a child custody determination requires: [T]hat

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2025 MSPB 1 Docket No. DC-1221-21-0203-W-1 Mary Reese, Appellant, v. Department of the Navy, Agency. January 31, 2025 Richard R. Renner , Esquire, Raleigh, North Carolina, for the appellant. Kristin Roberts , Esq

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2025 MSPB 1 Docket No. DC-1221-21-0203-W-1 Mary Reese, Appellant, v. Department of the Navy, Agency. January 31, 2025 Richard R. Renner , Esquire, Raleigh, North Carolina, for the appellant. Kristin Roberts , Esq

Motion granted to the extent of dismissing the appeal.

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation (“Department”) appeals from a district court judgment reversing a hearing officer’s decision to suspend Jay Gabel’s driving privileges for ninety-one days. We affirm the district court judgment. I [¶ 2] On April 23, 2005, a dispatcher at the Stutsman County Sheriffs Office sent a radio message to Officer Elizabeth Ka

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2016, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2016, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Gregory Oliver (“Mr. Oliver”), a former employee of Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), initiated this employee benefits case in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama, on September II, 2013. (Doc. 1-1 at 4).1 On October 22, 2

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 26) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s (“FedEx”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 29) and FedEx filed a reply (ECF No. 30). The Court held a hearing on July 2, 2013. For the reasons that follow, the Court

Mary Ann Gabel Executive Director Behaviorial Sciences Regulatory Board 712 Kansas, 1st Floor Topeka, Kansas 66603-3112 Dear Ms Gabel: As executive director of the Kansas behavioral sciences regulatory board you ask our opinion regarding eligibility requirements for a supervisor of a person who is completing the requisite two years of experience towards becoming licensed as a specialist clinical social worker (LSCSW). Your question pertains specifically to a LSCSW applicant wh

Mary Ann Gabel Executive Director Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board 712 Kansas, 1st Floor Topeka, Kansas 66603 Dear Ms Gabel: As executive director for the Kansas behavioral sciences regulatory board, you ask our opinion concerning the burden of proof required in an administrative proceeding to warrant disciplinary action against the holder of a professional license or registration. Specifically you ask whether the requisite burden is proof by a preponderance of the evidenc

Mary Ann Gabel Executive Director Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board Landon State Office Building, Suite 651-S 900 S.W. Jackson Topeka, Kansas 66612-1263 Dear Ms Gabel: As executive director of the behavioral sciences regulatory board you request our opinion regarding whether the proposed civil service class titles — "psychology trainee," "psychologist I," "psychologist II," "psychologist III," or "psychologist IV" — conflict with statutes pertaining to use of the

This is an appeal from a decision and order of the Franklin County Municipal Court. *Page 251 The action was initiated in the trial court by plaintiff City National Bank Trust Company. It alleged in the amended complaint that it was the holder in due course of a note executed by Larry and Patricia A. Warnock. A cognovit judgment was granted, but subsequently vacated. Mary Gabel Water Conditioning, Inc., was made a party plaintiff and the case was