Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Margo K. Brodie, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Dwayne Singleton, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at Brooklyn Detention Complex, commenced this action on January 10, 2014 against Defendants Jane Doe, a Housing Works psychologist, and Glenda Bubb and Denise Granum, parole officers with the New York State Division of Parole, alleging violations of his co

JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *401Before the Court is Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 63). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART . BACKGROUND At its core, this lawsuit alleges that the Orleans Parish District Attorney's

In re Casey-Jones, Ree J.; Sices, Christopher L.; Singleton, W. James; W. James Singleton D/B/A The Singleton Law Firm; W. James Singleton, A Professional Law Corporation, Inc.,;—Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 1, No. 558,905; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47807-CW. Denied.

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court upon the Motion to Remand of the plaintiff, Mary Singleton (“Singleton”). [Dkt. # 14]. For the following reasons, Singleton’s motion is denied. I. Background Singleton was involved in an automobile accident with an underinsured motorist on September 29, 2011, susta

ORDER AND REASONS CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Valspar Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 28), and Plaintiffs Opposition (Rec. Doc. 33). The motion is before the Court on supporting memoranda, without oral argument. Having considered the motion and legal memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 2

897 A.2d 636 (2006) 95 Conn.App. 492 STATE of Connecticut v. Dennis SINGLETON. No. 24726. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 5, 2006. Decided May 23, 2006. *639 Aaron J. Romano, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant

In re Burns Forest Products; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jackson, 2nd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 27,642; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 37,198-CA. Denied.

PER CURIAM. For the reasons separately assigned the judgment of the trial court assigning one hundred percent of fault to Singleton and no fault to Ross is affirmed with Schott, C.J. and Plotkin and Armstrong, JJ., concurring and with Landrieu and Murray, JJ., dissenting; The judgment of the trial court in favor of James Maher and against the Regional Transit Authority awarding attorney’s fees is rever

PER CURIAM: Background In April 1994, Diane Singleton and two other named plaintiffs filed suit challenging a policy of the Commissioner of Social Security on behalf of a proposed class of similarly situated individuals. 1 The policy involved offsetting retroactive Social Security d

hWALTZER, Judge. Andrea Hosken and Michelle Dale were two students at Springhill College in Mobile. Andrea Hosken wanted to rent a ear. The car rental agency refused to rent to her because she was less than 21 years old. Accordingly, Hosken and Dale arranged for Michelle Dale to sign the rental agreement. Although Dale signed the rental agreement, Hosken paid for the rental with her own credit card. Predictably Hosken was invo

*948Opinion WILLIS, J. On December 6, 1990, a jury found Frederick Keith Singleton guilty of distributing cocaine. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to set aside the verdict, or, in the alternative, for a mistrial, based upon a juror’s response during polling of the jury. However, since this issue was not raised time

[Cite as State v. Singleton, 2024-Ohio-465.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112588 v. : LEENEJA SINGLETON,

LILLIAN SINGLETON, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD37106 ) SHEILA SINGLETON, et al., ) Filed: April 6, 2022 ) Defe

260 S.W.3d 756 (2007) Dawn Michelle SINGLETON, Appellant, v. Michael Larue SINGLETON, Appellee. No. CA 06-1070. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. August 29, 2007. *757 James M. Pratt, Jr., Camden, AR, for appellant. Mary Thomason, El Dorado, AR, for appellee. WENDELL L. GRIFFEN, Judge. Appellant Dawn Singleton br

PER CURIAM: On June 6, 1985, between approximately 3:00 and 3:30 P.m., claimant's wife was operating her husband's 1977 Monte Carlo in a southerly direction, in Twilight, between Robin Hood and Bandytown, when the vehicle struck a pothole. The left front and left rear tires and a rim of the vehicle were damaged in the amount of $ 210.55. Claimant's wife, Mary Ann Singleton, testified that she had driven h

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge Mary Singleton, the mother of the Plaintiffs (“the Singletons”), purchased an annuity in an effort to obtain long-term care Medicaid benefits for her husband Claude. The Singletons allege their mother, now deceased, was forced to structure her annuity to comply with directives of the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Famil

MOORE, J. It Charged with attempted second degree murder, Billy T. Singleton was found guilty of aggravated battery and sentenced to eight years at hard labor. He now appeals, urging the evidence was insufficient to convict and the sentence is excessive. We affirm. Factual Background Singleton’s victim was his wife, Sheron-da. Sheronda testified that in October 2010, their r

KELLUM, Judge. The appellant, Robert Wade Singleton, appeals from the circuit court’s revocation of his probation. In December 2005, Singleton pleaded guilty to trafficking in marijuana, a violation of § 13A-12-231, Ala. Code 1975. The circuit court sentenced Singleton to 15 years’ imprisonment; however, that sentence was split, and Singleton was ordered to serve 3 years’ imprisonment followed by 12 years’ supervised probati

GARRISON, Judge. Defendants David Singleton, Jr., Kenneth Pearson and Eugene Jones were charged by bill of information with armed robbery in violation of La.R.S. 14:64. On May 12,1983, a jury found all three defendants guilty of attempted armed robbery and they were each later sentenced to serve fifteen years at hard labor. Defendants appeal these convictions and sentences. The facts of this case are as f

717 S.E.2d 391 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Sara Marie SINGLETON & Latesha Joy Fuller. No. 197P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 25, 2011. Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Singleton, Sara Marie. Kimberly W. Duffley, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C. Paul F. Herzog, Fayetteville, for Fuller, Latesha Joy. Thomas