Cases

FAGG, Circuit Judge. Douglas Beery brought this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his Iowa convictions for first-degree murder and assault with intent to commit serious injury. The State of Iowa, through warden John Ault, moved to dismiss the peti *950 tion as untimely. The district cou

283 S.W.3d 314 (2009) Mary M. DOUGLAS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. No. ED 91392. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. May 26, 2009. Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before KATHIA

OPINION COWEN, Circuit Judge. Defendants Douglas M. Weidner, Kathleen K. Weidner, and DMW Marine, LLC (“DMW”), appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting Plaintiff Deborah D. Klein’s motion for summary judgment as to her claim that Mr. Weidner’s transfer of a parcel of real

*247YOUNG, C.J. Under the terms of the no-fault act,1 a person injured in a motor vehicle accident is entitled to recover personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits for “[allowable expenses consisting of all reasonable charges incurred for reasonably necessary products, services and accommodation

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 426 Helen Marie Douglas (Respondent) was convicted of the murder and armed robbery of her husband, Rufus "Ronnie" Douglas (the victim). The Court of Appeals reversed the convictions and remanded the case for a new trial. State v. Douglas,359 S.C. 187,

359 S.C. 187 (2004) 597 S.E.2d 1 The STATE, Respondent, v. Helen Marie DOUGLAS, Appellant. No. 3772. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard December 10, 2003. Decided April 5, 2004. Withdrawn, Substituted and Refiled May 21, 2004. *192 Jack B. Swerling, of Columbia, for

34 A.3d 452 (2012) 133 Conn.App. 182 Zygmunt GOLEK v. SAINT MARY'S HOSPITAL, INC., et al. No. 32325. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 26, 2011. Decided January 24, 2012. *455 Neil L. Moskow, with whom, on the brief, were Deborah M. Garskof and Stephanie Dellolio, Fairfield, f

Pillard, Circuit Judge: In 1985, John Croley brought a personal injury suit against the Republican National Committee (RNC) in the District of Columbia Superior Court after an RNC security guard physically assaulted Croley while he was photographing an overflowing dumpster near RNC headquarters. See Croley v. Republican Nat'l Comm. ,

POLSTON, C.J. We review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 83 So.3d 1002, 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), in which the Second *422District certified the following question of great public importance:1 DOES ACCEPTING AS RES JUDICA-TA THE EIGHT PHASE I FINDING

OPINION WATFORD, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals, Douglas Leite and David Thompson, worked as machinists at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard in Hawaii, where they were allegedly injured by exposure to asbestos. They sued defendants under state tort law on the theory that defendants failed to warn them of the hazards posed

Attorneys for the parties and amici are listed at the conclusion of this opinion In the Indiana Supreme Court Mar 02 2016, 3:37 pm _________________________________ No. 49S00-1502-MI-119 LARRY MYERS AND LOA MYERS, Appellants (Plaintiffs),

ORDER PER CURIAM. Employer, McDonnell Douglas Corp., and its insurer, Fremont/Cambridge Integrated Services, appeal from a final award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, finding that claimant, John Lowry, was permanently totally disabled and awarding benefits. No error of law appears and there was sufficient competent evidence to support the award. An opinion would have no precedential valu

SILER, Circuit Judge: Douglas F. Martin appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order finding him bound by its previous orders compelling and then approving the bankruptcy trustee’s settlement of a state court action brought against Martin by Leonidas Pahiakos. *1274 The b

OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Like many states, Michigan has amended its Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) on a number of occasions in recent years for the professed purpose of making Michigan communities safer and aiding law enforcement in the task of bringing recidivists to justice. Thus, what began in 1994 as a non-public registry mai

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-1004 JOHN PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the Un

*1000ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SANDRA M. SNYDER, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant John Bean Technologies Corporation (“JBT”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ first cause of action for negligence, contending that Plaintiffs negligence claim is subject to and precluded by the exclusive remedy provision

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAYA ARCE; her father and next Nos. 13-15657 best friend, SEAN ARCE, 13-15760 Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00623- v. AWT DIANE DOUGLAS, Arizona

481 F.3d 977 Eugene WINKLER, Gary Gersen, Timuel Black, Mary Cay Marubio, and C. Douglas Ferguson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Robert M. GATES, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-3451. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 6, 2006. Decided April 4, 2007. Ad

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-appellants appeal a January 11, 2016 judgment of the district court dismissing this putative class action against defendants-appellees. The Fourth Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) alleges that certain fiduciaries of the JPMor-gan Chase & Co. 401 (k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”) breached the duty of prudence owed to Plan participants under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 100

THAYER, J. The plaintiff, Daniel W. Harvey, appeals from a Superior Court (Gray, J.) order denying his petition to quiet title. We affirm. The plaintiff owns property located on the east side of Brackett Road in Rye. Since 1977, the defendants, Douglas T. and Mary M. Hsu, have owned a parcel abutting the plaintiff’s land and situated between the plaintiff’s parcel and Brackett Road. The plaintiff claim