Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

PER CURIAM. Petitioners Laphonso Williams, Mary Ann Sims, Samuel Woods, and Walter Teasley, Jr. were employed by the City of Cincinnati, Ohio (City) as Public Service Employment (PSE) participants under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA), 29 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARY BETH MONTERA, Nos. 22-16375 individually and on behalf of all others 22-16622 similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:16-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant / 06980-RS Cross-Appellee, v. OPINION PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION, FKA Joint Juice, Inc.,

662 F.Supp. 191 (1987) Keith KEYSER and Barbara Keyser, individually and as Guardians of Aaron B. Keyser, Plaintiffs, v. ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, INC., an Idaho corporation, and Joel H. Hendrickson, M.D., Defendants. Civ. No. 87-3041. United States District Court, D. Idaho. June 11, 1987. *192 E.L. Miller, Paine, Hamblen, Coffin, Bro

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Sims appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of defendant on her claims that she was not promoted to the position of Veterans Administration (VA) Assistant District Counsel in Cleveland in 1979 because of sex and age discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et se

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00327-COA DANNY R. SIMS APPELLANT v. DANIEL SIMS AND MARY KATHLEEN SIMS APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/21/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CYNTHIA L. BREWER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FO

883 F.2d 287 58 USLW 2158, 1989-2 Trade Cases 68,731,11 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 14 Mary A. CARLSON; Romana Stazen; Kenneth Owens; Richard B.Allen; C.V. Alston; Charles Armour, Jr.; Pierce Beauzay;Lewis O. Beck; Claude A. Black; Charles A. Blau; RaymondE. Booker; Robert L. Branham; Thomas R. Brown; Davis W.Brunson, Sr.; William E. Bubsey; Jimmy B. Burrell; ThomasH. Burrell; Frank Carruth

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 8, 2013 ANDREW DOUGLAS SPRAGUE v. MARY NELLE SPRAGUE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 08D1121 W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge No. E2012-01133-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 18, 2013 In this post-divorce case, the issues are twofold: whether the trial court erred in award

PER CURIAM. Cherry Grace Sims ("the mother") and Sharon K. Doviet, the guardian ad litem appointed to represent the children of the mother and Douglas Lawrence Sims ("the father"), filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking relief from a November 14, 2017, order of the Madison Circuit Court ("the trial court"). This is the second time these petitioners have been before this court. In Ex parte Sims,

PER CURIAM. Cherry Grace Sims ("the mother") and Sharon K. Doviet, the guardian ad litem appointed to represent the children of the mother and Douglas Lawrence Sims ("the father"), filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking relief from a November 14, 2017, order of the Madison Circuit Court ("the trial court"). This is the second time these petitioners have been before this court. In Ex parte Sims,

ACCEPTED 13-14-00623-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leon Ratliff appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ratliffs complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proc

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1481 LORI FREEMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DAL-TILE CORPORATION, d/b/a Dal-Tile Distribution, Incorporated, d/b/a Dal-Tile Services, Incorporated, Defendant – Appellee, and VOSTONE INCORPORATED; TIMOTHY KOESTER, Defendants.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Richard A. Kaminsky appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-2274 MARY FLENER, on behalf of RAY FLENER, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the Un

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. ■ This case is before the Court on the Defendants’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) (Docket No. 23). For the reasons set forth below, this motion will be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, James Ryals, Jr. (“Ryals”) applied for employment with GCA Services Group, In

CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs are shareholders of Defendant Aflac Incorporated ("AFLAC"). Concerned about several corporate transactions and potential mismanagement, they urged AFLAC to bring claims against certain officers and members of the board of directors for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and violations of sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20A(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§

PER CURIAM: Tyrone D. Murry appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a jury trial on an employment discrimination claim. Murry also challenges the district court’s order denying his motions to compel and requesting additional discovery. We have reviewed the record, including the tran*266scripts, and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. According

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 25, 1999 Session ROBERT VAUGHN ODOM v. MARY JO ODOM Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dickson County No. 3564-94 Allen W. Wallace, Judge No. M1999-02811-COA-R3-CV Filed December 5, 2001 This appeal involves a bitter cust

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Rosemary Vega and Jesus Ramos brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Illinois law against the Chicago Board of Education, the Board's members, and certain Board security personnel. The operative complaint alleges that Defendants violated Vega's First Amendment righ