Cases

444 B.R. 871 (2011) In re Mohamed KEBE, Debtor. Susan L. Rhiel, Plaintiff, v. Central Mortgage Company, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 10-52667. Adversary No. 10-2172. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, at Columbus. March 30, 2011. *872 Treisa L. Fox, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Maria C M

Opinion issued December 19, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00357-CV ——————————— KHYBER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant V. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK O

ACCEPTED 08-24-00024-CV 08-24-00024-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 10/30/2024 3:34 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KRISTEN MARY DE SUAREZ ) D’AULAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0074-LWW ) PATRICK MARIE STEPHANE DE ) SUAREZ D’AULAN, ) )

ACCEPTED 2013-509,724 SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/8/2015 9:24:00 PM

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and i

OPINION & ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI, District Judge: This is one of many cases arising out of the collapse of the housing market. This one comes with a twist: homeowners in Detroit who received subprime loans seek to hold a single investment bank responsible under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) for discriminating against African-American borrowers, based on their claim that African-Americans were more

354 F.Supp.2d 1209 (2005) Sherri LITTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAVERICK PAPER CO., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 03-2377-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 28, 2005. *1210 Rebecca M. Randles, Randles & Mata, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. Eric E. Packel, John J. Yates, Husch & Eppenberge

Filed 1/29/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE LEONID GONCHAROV et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A149347 v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., (San Francisco City & County Supe

Margulies, J. *1161Plaintiffs Leonid Goncharov, Mohammed Eddine, Alan Freberg, Trevor Johnson, Peter Kirby, and Jeremy Watt filed a putative class action lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber) for providing unlicensed transportation services that appropriated passengers and income from licensed taxicab drivers. In the second amended

805 F.Supp.2d 858 (2011) M & I BANK, FSB, Plaintiff, v. Ty COUGHLIN, et al., Defendants. No. CV09-2282-PHX-NVW. United States District Court, D. Arizona. August 9, 2011. *860 Kathleen Ann Weber, Larry Omer Folks, Folks & Oconnor PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, Rachel M. Dollar, Sean M. Beehler, Jon Ac Vonderhaar, Smith Dollar PC, Sant

NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *473Before the Court is Plaintiff Amanda Foster's ("Foster") "Motion for Reconsideration/New Trial/and/or to Amend or Alter Judgment Under Rule 59."1 This is an action for review of the denial of long-term disability benefits and life insurance waiver of premium

544 F.3d 486 (2008) James WORNICK, Karen Wornick, Appellants, v. Thomas GAFFNEY, Trustee-Appellee. Docket No. 07-1657-bk. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued July 9, 2008. Decided September 24, 2008. *488 Denis A. Kitchen, Esq., Williamsville, NY, for Appellants. Lawrence C. Brown, Esq.,

388 F.Supp.2d 1261 (2005) Sherri LITTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAVERICK PAPER CO., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 03-2377-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 21, 2005. *1262 *1263 *1264 *1265

*547OPINION OF THE COURT Marcy S. Friedman, J. These four related actions seek payment of principal and interest on notes issued in public offerings. Three of the actions were brought to recover on payment in kind notes (PIK notes or notes). Plaintiffs in these actions are Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp., an assignee for collection, and/or Wilmington

PHILLIP J. SHEFFERLY, Bankruptcy Judge. Opinion Granting Motion To Remand Introduction Leslie Etterbeek (“Etterbeek”) is a member in a limited liability company. Etterbeek filed a lawsuit in state court against five other members of the limited liability company and two individuals related to two of those members. The defendants removed the lawsuit to the bankruptcy c

Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION 2 Before the Court is a sua sponte Order wherein the parties were asked to brief three issues, i.e. , whether the Proceeding should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, if the Court should abstain from hearing the Proceeding, or if the Court should remand the Proceeding to state court.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARTIN VOGEL, No. 16-55229 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:14-cv-04609-SJO-SH HARBOR PLAZA CENTER, LLC, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central D

*986ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 14) KANDIS A. WESTMORE, United States Magistrate Judge On February 24, 2014, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Charlotte Penermon’s first amended complaint alleging that Wells Fargo vio