⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Match Group, LLC v. Google LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1543 Document: 68 Page: 1 Filed: 08/12/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2020-1543 ______________________ Appeal
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-08-15 · Published · cited 0× · 335 F. Supp. 3d 1156
The Ninth Circuit has held that the CDA "does not declare 'a general immunity from liability deriving from third-party content.' " Internet Brands , 824 F.3d at 852 (quoting Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc. , 570 F.3d 1096
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 282 F. Supp. 3d 1150
The Ninth Circuit has held that the CDA "does not declare 'a general immunity from liability deriving from third-party content.' " Internet Brands , 824 F.3d at 852 (quoting Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc ., 570 F.3d 1096
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-06-22 · Published · cited 46× · 2 F.4th 871
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
7/8/2021 10:09:43 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-956.pdf 18-956_new.pdf versus 62 pages (323 KB) 62 pages (308 KB)
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-04-05 · Published · cited 6× · 593 U.S. 1
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
5/3/2021 12:16:35 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-956.pdf 18-956_new.pdf versus 62 pages (323 KB) 62 pages (321 KB)
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
4/6/2021 10:15:22 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-956.pdf 18-956_new.pdf versus 62 pages (323 KB) 62 pages (322 KB)
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 593 U.S. 1
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-01-12 · Published · cited 24× · 90 F.4th 919
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1185 GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States D
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-03-03 · Published · cited 15× · 989 F.3d 1205
USCA11 Case: 20-10856 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-10856 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:18-cv-80843-BER MIDLEVELU, INC.,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 726 F. Supp. 2d 911; 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1071; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56786; 2010 WL 2363620
726 F.Supp.2d 911 (2010) VULCAN GOLF, LLC, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc., Blitz Realty Group, Inc., and Vincent E. "BO" Jackson, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. No. 07 C 3371. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 9, 2010. *912 Robert M. Foote, Craig S. Mielke, Matthew J. Herman, Foote, M
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 730 F. Supp. 2d 610; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78122; 2010 WL 3056689
730 F.Supp.2d 610 (2010) BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC f/k/a Polaris IP, LLC v. GOOGLE INC., et al. Case No. 2:07-CV-371-CE. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. August 2, 2010. *613 Adam S. Goldberg, Irell & Manella, Adam S. Hoffman, Alexander Chester Giza, Andrew D. Weiss, Marc A. Fenster, Stanley H. Thompson
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010-03-11 · Published · cited 1× · 706 F. Supp. 2d 739; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28500; 2010 WL 986618
706 F.Supp.2d 739 (2010) PA ADVISORS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:07-cv-480 (RRR). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. March 11, 2010. *740 Adam S. Hoffman, Alexander Chester Giza, Andrew D. Weiss, Marc A. Fenster, Stanley H. Thompson, Jr., Russ August & Kabat, Los
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00020-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/17/2025 7:29 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-03-05 · Published · cited 25× · 693 F. Supp. 2d 370; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20154; 2010 WL 779325
693 F.Supp.2d 370 (2010) TRADECOMET.COM LLC, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 1400(SHS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 5, 2010. *372 Joseph J. Bial, Charles F. Rule, Daniel Joseph Howley, Jr., Jonathan Seth Kanter, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Chul Pak,
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2025-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00553-CV ___________________________ ZILLOW, INC. AND ZILLOW GROUP, INC., Appellants V. BMB DEVELOPMENT, LLC, MICHAEL BENSON, AND BRADINA BENSON, Appellees On Appeal from t