Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Matthew R Page”
Page v. Obaisipublic domain
Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge In this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Duane Page, a prisoner in state custody, challenges treatment provided for a hand injury he sustained while playing basketball. Defendants Ghaliah Obaisi, Independent Executor of the Estate
Gotham Insurance Co. v. Matthewpublic domain
WALLIS, J. Gotham Insurance Company (“Appellant”) appeals the denial of its motion to vacate an amended default final judgment. Although Appellant was not a party to the action below, Lake Buena Vista Vacation Resort, L.C. (“LBV”), brought a cross-claim against Appellant’s insured, Coastal Title Insurance, Co. (“Coastal”).1 Eighteen months after the trial court entered a default final judgment on
Lane v. Pagepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Lead Plaintiffs Notice of Mo*1185tion and Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, filed January 27, 2012 (Doc. 370)(“Motion for Approval of Class Settlement”); (ii) Miller Barondess, LLP’s Objection to Use of S
People v. Matthew A.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 539 OPINION SUMMARY The juvenile court declared appellant Matthew A. a ward of the court after finding that he had committed a first degree burglary. The court placed appellant home on probation, and set a maximum term of confinement of six ye
Hattie T. v. Matthew R. and Melissa R.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CP-00926-COA HATTIE T. APPELLANT v. MATTHEW R. AND MELISSA R. APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/19/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLIE J. GRAHAM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
Page v. Pagepublic domain
[Cite as Page v. Page, 2022-Ohio-411.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STEFANIE P. PAGE : : First Petitioner-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 2021-CA-47 : v. : Trial C
State of Maine v. Matthew R. Davispublic domain
GORMAN, J. [¶ 1] Matthew R. Davis appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court (Aroostook County, Hunter, J. ) for a total of ten charges-two counts of intentional or knowing murder, 17-A M.R.S. § 201(1)(A) (2017) ; four counts of arson (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 802(1)(A) (2017) ; one count of theft (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. § 353(1)(B)(1) (2017) ; tw
Roundtree v. Pagepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA DEBRA ROUNDTREE, AN INDIVIDUAL; STEVEN KIDMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; PAGE ACTION COMMITTEE, A REGISTERED POLITICAL COMMITTEE, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF PAGE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA; KARY HOLLOWAY, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CITY CLERK; KIM LARSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING DEPUTY CITY CLERK,
Robinson, William Matthew v. Statepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 711 OPINION Appellant, a person required to register under the Sex Offender Registration Program (SORP),1 is charged with failure to timely report on December 5, 2000, to Seabrook Police the date of his intended move and his ne
State of Tennessee v. Shavone D. Pagepublic domain
04/08/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 26, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHAVONE D. PAGE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 88008 Hector Sanchez, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Matthew R. Steffespublic domain
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 34. (dissenting). In common parlance, Matthew Steffes, the defendant, and his co-conspirators set up a complicated *706scheme to steal from the telephone company. They intended to, and did, bilk the telephone company of what the telephone company sells — telephone services. ¶ 35. The defendant is not, however, guilty
Ryan Matthew Hart v. R.D. (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 10 2019, 6:25 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
State v. Matthew Peckhampublic domain
Supreme Court No. 2023-75-C.A. (P2/21-1544CG) (Dissent begins on Page 34) State : v. : Matthew Peckham. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supre
Matthew Hight v. DHSpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 29, 2024 Decided May 2, 2025 No. 23-5273 MATTHEW J. HIGHT, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Matthew R. Frazier v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Jan 24 2018, 7:21 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as CLERK Indiana Supreme Court precedent or cited before any court except for the
Matthew R. Potter v. Kara A. Potter (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 29 2018, 7:32 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res judicat
Emmanuel Page v. Matthew J. Frankpublic domain
*903 RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Emmanuel Page appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court held that the last decision rendered on the merits by the state courts, the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin’s decision of May 19, 1999, was b
In re Matthew W.public domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Francesco Scotti v. Matthew Mimiagapublic domain
Supreme Court No. 2023-91-Appeal. (PC 21-4667) Francesco Scotti : v. : Matthew Mimiaga. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 250 Benefit Stree
Matthew Swilley v. William Thomaspublic domain
01/31/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 17, 2023 Session MATTHEW SWILLEY ET AL. v. WILLIAM THOMAS ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 21-0437 Pamela A. Fleenor, Chancellor ________________________________