Cases

OPINION WINFREE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A State of Alaska employee was discharged. With union representation, the employee challenged his termination in grievance proceedings; he was unsuccessful. When he later filed suit for wrongful termination, the State subpoenaed the union representative to appear for a deposition with the union's grievance file. The superior court denied the emplo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER • Laurie Smith Camp, Chief United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Federal Election Commission (the “Commission”) and Matthew S. Peterson (“Peterson”), ECF No. 21, and the United States of America, ECF No. 25. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss their claims against the United States without prejudice. Accordingly, their

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On January 18, 2012, the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation .(“Report”) in the above-captioned matter recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Officer Matthew Regina, the New York City Police Department, and the City of New Y

MEMORANDUM YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff Bondholders (the “Bondholders”) in this case are suing U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), their indenture trustee, for its actions during the bond’s default, and subsequent sale of the mortgage securing the bonds. Am. Compl. (“Compl.”), ECF No. 7. The plaintiffs bring seven claims in contract and tort: br

93 P.3d 458 (2004) Russell J. PETERSON, Jr., Appellant, v. Tyna EK, Appellee. No. S-10535. Supreme Court of Alaska. June 25, 2004. *460 Russell J. Peterson, Jr., pro se, Juneau. Tyna Ek, pro se, Seattle, Washington. Before: BRYNER, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, FABE, and CARPENETI, Justices.

ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the court is defendants the Clark County School District (“CCSD”), Filiber-to Arroyo (“Arroyo”), Brian Nebeker (“Nebeker”), Loren Johnson (“Johnson”), and Armando Quintanilla’s (“Quintanilla”) (collectively “moving defendants”) motion for reconsideration of the court’s January 10, 2014 order denying in-part and granting in-part their motion for su

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the court is defendants the Clark County School District (“CCSD”), Filiberto Arroyo (“Arroyo”), Brian Nebeker (“Nebeker”), Loren Johnson (“Johnson”), and Armando Quintanilla’s (“Quintanilla”) (collectively “moving defendants”) motion for summary judgment. Doc. # 202.1 Plaintiffs Linda and Francis Peterson (“the Petersons”) filed an opposition (Doc. # 217)

DIAZ, Circuit Judge: Yerson Jack Mauricio-Vasquez is a lawful permanent resident of the United States and a native and citizen of Peru. Before us is his petition for review of the determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals that he is removable under the Immigration and Nationality Act (the "INA") based on his commission of a crime involving moral turpitude within five years of hi

783 F.Supp.2d 1167 (2011) Gray PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. Alvin LaCABE, in his official capacity as Manager of Safety for the City and County of Denver, Defendant, John W. Suthers, Attorney General for the State of Colorado, Intervenor. Civil Action No. 10-cv-00059-WDM-MEH. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 8, 2011. *116

275 S.W.3d 374 (2009) Kurt W. PONZAR, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Steven G. PETERSON and Virginia Busch, Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 91376. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. January 27, 2009. Kurt Ponzar, Weldon Springs, pro se. Steven Peterson, Chesterfield, pro se. Matthew Kallial, Howard Wittner-cocounsel, David Von Gontard

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. * A provision of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, 22 U.S.C. § 8772 , makes available for postjudgment execution a set o

CALABRIA, Judge. *191 Lillian Cain ("respondent") appeals from an order authorizing the Substitute Trustee, *838 Goddard & Peterson, PLLC ("G & P"), to proceed with the foreclosure of

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 22, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TEN

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.

Dooley, J. ¶ 1. The issue in this case is the scope of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases, specifically, whether physical evidence obtained as a result of a violation of defendant’s Miranda rights must be excluded at trial. We conclude that under the Vermont Constitution, *437Chapter I, Article 10, and the Vermont exclusionary rule, physical evidence obtain

627 F.3d 1117 (2010) Deborah D. PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant, v. World Bank, Movant, v. CMA CGM, Third-party-defendant-Appellee, and Japan Bank for International Cooperation; A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; Mediterranean Shipping Company, Third-party-defendants. No. 08-17756. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Arg

117 S.W.3d 804 (2003) Ex Parte James Michael PETERSON, Appellee. No. 0201-02. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. October 8, 2003. *807 Deric King Walpole, McKinney, for Appellant. John A. Stride, Asst. DA, McKinney, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State. OPINION PER CURIAM. In thi

Baker, J. Robert and Judith Koester purchased property in a subdivision governed by covenants that required lot owners to obtain approval from an architectural control committee (ACC) before beginning construction. The Koesters built a pool and mechanical room, and were sued by their neighbors. Although the Koesters had submitted plans, the trial court found that they had deliberately and knowingly violated the consent to constru

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Approximately thirty-five mortgagors appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal of their claims against the Federal Home *550 Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and other financial institutions, the law firm of Usset