Cases

OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Matthew Wayne Henry appeals his conviction for illegal possession of a homemade machine gun, under 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). He contends that he has a Second Amendment right to possess a homemade machine gun in his home. We reject this argument because machine guns are “dangerous and unusual weapons” that ar

903 A.2d 333 (2006) 2006 ME 67 In re Matthew W. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 8, 2006. Decided: June 12, 2006. *334 Carolyn A. Adams, Esq. (orally), Smith Law Offices, P.A., Bangor, Noreen L. Nee, Esq., Milford, for appellants. *335 G. Steven Rowe, Attorne

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-01050-COA MATTHEW DIXON A/K/A MATTHEW WAYNE APPELLANT DIXON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JON MARK WEATHERS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR

HULL, Circuit Judge: In this uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage case, three excess liability insurers — Great American Insurance Company (“Great American”), American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company (“American Guarantee”), and Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company (“Endurance”) (collectively “the Defendants”) — appeal the district court’s order

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S ATTEMPT TO RETAIN AND PAY A MEDIATOR WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THIS COURT’S APPROVAL UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), FEDERAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2014(a), AND THE LOCAL RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION [Docket No. 332] Jeff Bohm, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction Is a mediator a “profe

07/02/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 27, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DARRELL WAYNE SMITH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Roane County No. 2012-CR-167 Michael S. Pemberton, Judge ___________________________________

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. In this appeal four groups of prospective intervenors-the Arnett I, Arnett II, Charter Land Co. LLC, and Wyborny appellants-challenge the district court's 1 denials of their motions to intervene in a class action lawsuit by named plaintiff Connie Jean Smith against SEECO, Inc.,

Ferreyra v Wayne (2024 NY Slip Op 00374) Ferreyra v Wayne 2024 NY Slip Op 00374 Decided on January 30, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

*4YOUNG, J. This case concerns the jurisdiction of circuit courts to modify judgments of foreclosure when the foreclosing governmental unit deprives the property owner of due process. Generally, the provision of the General Property Tax Act (GPTA),1 at issue in this case, as well as recent amendments

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 60) TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This civil action is before the Court on Defendants’1 joint motion to dismiss (Doc. *85660), and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 64, 65). I. FACTS AS ALLEGED BY THE PLAINTIFF

OPINION AND ORDER CLYDE H. HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge, J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ second motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and permanent injunction. In their first motion for TRO, filed June 11, 2012, Plaintiffs sought either to have their names restored to the ballot

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE On August 3, 2017, Plaintiff Deborah Smith filed a state court Complaint [ECF No. 5] against Defendants Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust (the Fund) and Garland Smith. This case was removed to federal court [ECF No. 1] on August 25, 2017. On August 31, 2017, the Fund filed a Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [ECF No. 7], to which the Plainti

Appellant's motion for rehearing denied.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6050 In re: * * Matthew J. Smith, * * Debtor. * * Matthew J. Smith, * Appeal from the United S

RUCKER, Justice. At issue in this case is the scope of judicial review where a property owner challenges the compensation awarded for condemnation of its property by a city’s board of public works under an eminent domain statute applicable to cities and towns. Background and Procedural History Doing business as Aqua Indiana, Utilit

98 P.3d 881 (2004) 209 Ariz. 195 STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Matthew J. SMITH, Mohave County Attorney, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Steven F. CONN, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MOHAVE, Respondent Judge, Phillip Wayne Tinnell, Real Party In Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 04-0180. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.<

PER CURIAM. Kevin Smith appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. For reversal, he argues that the District Court should not have dismissed his complaint based on abstention principles or defendants’ immunity from suit. His counsel has since moved to withdraw. For the reasons discussed below, we a

Affirmed and Opinion filed September 5, 2002 Affirmed and Opinion filed September 5, 2002. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

26 Kan. App.2d 351 (1999) 985 P.2d 715 DARCY MATTHEW SMITH, Appellant, v. MICHAEL L. KENNEDY, M.D., and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COFFEY COUNTY HOSPITAL, Appellees. No. 80,538. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed August 6, 1999. Stephen N. Six and Victor A. Bergman, of Shamberg, Johnson & Bergman, Chtd., of Overland Park, f

679 N.E.2d 893 (1997) Terry SMITH, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Ronald J. PANCNER, M.D., Richard F. Thompson, Jr., M.D., Pancner Psychiatric Services, Summit Psychiatric Services, P.C., and The Insurance Commissioner of the State of Indiana, Appellees (Defendants below). No. 49S05-9610-CV-679. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 13, 1997.