Cases

Gary F. Traynor, Justice (1) In a Superior Court civil action, the defendant, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont"), filed a motion to dismiss a complaint brought by the plaintiff, Matthew B. Mooney. Mooney alleged that he had been fraudulently induced to buy shares of DuPont stock having relied on allegedly false statements made by DuPont's officers. During the proceedings on

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company and its subsidiary Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. (collectively “DuPont”) appeal from the orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri imposing sanctions on DuPont by striking DuPont’s contract reformation defense and counterclaims and awarding Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technol

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Kolon’s MOTION FOR RECUSAL AND DISQUALIFICATION (Docket No. 247). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 3, 2009, E.I. du Pont Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) filed a Complaint against Kolon Industries, Inc. (“Kolon”) claiming,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendant Kolon Industries, Inc.’s (“Kolon”) MOTION FOR RECUSAL AND DISQUALIFICATION (Docket No. 1875). For the reasons that follow, the motion will be denied. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1. General Background On February 3, 2009, E.I. du Pont Nemours and Company (“Du

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. On April 12, 2010, Plaintiffs Haley Paint Company and Isaac Industries, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint and initiated this class action lawsuit against Defendant E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. (“Du Pont”) and others, alleging a *334conspiracy to fix the pr

803 F.Supp.2d 469 (2011) E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KOLON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:09cv58. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. July 21, 2011. *474 Rodney A. Satterwhite, Brian Charles Riopelle, Kristen Marie Calleja, Matthew Devane Fender, Robyn Suzanne Gr

*288MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff E.I. du PONT de NEMOURS AND COMPANY’S (“DuPont”) MOTION TO STRIKE ERRATA SHEETS OF CERTAIN KOLON DEPONENTS (Docket No. 876). The motion seeks to strike errata sheets that make changes to the deposition testimony of two of Kolon’s witnesses, Su-Y

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge BENNETT joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: On December 14, 2006, the Trustee in this Chapter 11 bankruptcy of National Gas Distributors, LLC, a distributor of natural gas to industrial, governmental, and other customers, commenced these adversary proceedings under 11 U.S

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. Opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board held E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. engaged in an unfair labor practice by unilaterally implementing changes to its employee benefits program while it was between collectiv

958 A.2d 245 (2008) E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE L.P., Defendant. C.A. No. 3741-VCL. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: July 16, 2008. Decided: July 29, 2008. *246 P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., Esquire, Matthew F. Lintner, Esquire, Patricia Uhlenbrock, Esquire, Jason C.

556 F.3d 247 (2009) In re NATIONAL GAS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, Debtor. Richard M. Hutson, II, Trustee for National Gas Distributors, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E.I du Pont de Nemours and Company, Incorporated; Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated, f/k/a Stadler's Country Hams, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants. International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.; BP Energy Company; BP Canada Energy Marketing Corporation; Nexen Marketi

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether, under Hawaii law, a manufacturer has a duty to warn of danger posed by a material that is later used in a medical implant device. *897I Elysa Kealoha and the eight' other appellants (collectively “Kealoha”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of E.I. du

*714 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ATLAS, District Judge. Plaintiff Doris Williams (“Williams” or “Plaintiff’), an African-American woman, filed this action on November 21, 1994, claiming that Defendants E.I. du Pont de Nem-ours & Company (“DuPont”), Pete Chapman (“Chapman”), and Benjamin Davis (“Davis”) discriminated against her on the basis of

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MATTHEW B. MOONEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N17C-01-374 AML ) E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION COBB, District Judge. Before this court is E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company’s (Du Pont) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Rule 50(a)(1) of the Fed.R.Civ.P. against plaintiff, Sonja D. Poore (Poore). Poore brought this claim alleging that she was unlawfully denied a lateral transfer in retaliation for previous complaints of discrimination and for intentional inflictio

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0261p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 │ PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATI

Opinion Musgrave, Judge: Confidential material appears in the confidential version of this opinion in brackets and is deleted from the public version of the opinion. *1267In this action, plaintiffs E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., ICI Americas Inc., and Hoechst Celanese Corporation challenge the final results of

988 P.2d 97 (1999) Paul Charles FLYNN, Alexie Paul Flynn, natural father of Paul Charles Flynn, and Maggie Flynn, natural mother of Paul Charles Flynn, Appellants, v. E.I. du PONT de NEMOURS AND COMPANY, and Remington Arms Company, Inc., Appellees. Nos. S-8551. Supreme Court of Alaska. September 17, 1999. Rehearing Denied November 10, 1999.

576 A.2d 635 (1989) E.I. DU PONT de NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. HEM RESEARCH, INC., a Maryland corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 10747. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: October 31, 1989. Decided: November 6, 1989. *636 William H. Sudell, Jr., Jack B. Bl

8 F.Supp.2d 854 (1998) E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor. Slip. Op. 98-46. Court No. 97-01-00055. United States Court of International Trade. April 15, 1998. *855 Crowell & Moring LLP (Barry E. Cohen, Matthew Tuc