⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Matthews v. Sagal”

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001-10-31 · Published · cited 4× · 784 A.2d 39; 141 Md. App. 1; 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 162
784 A.2d 39 (2001) 141 Md. App. 1 BOUCHER INVESTMENTS, L.P. v. ANNAPOLIS-WEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al. No. 333, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 31, 2001. *40 Thomas Gisriel (Christopher W. Poverman, Betty Sue Diener and Hodes, Ulman, Pessin & Katz, P.A. on the brief),
Massachusetts Superior Court · 1997-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 295
Doerfer, J. The defendant, Christina Martin (“Martin”) was convicted of one count of first degree murder by a Bristol County jury (Carey, J., presiding)1 on November 13, 1992. This matter is how before the Court for consideration of the defendant’s motion for a new trial under Mass.R.Crim.P. 30(b).2 The defendant argues that a new trial is warranted because she received in
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984-12-12 · Published · cited 29× · 599 F. Supp. 731; 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1031; 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 653; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21313; 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,246
599 F.Supp. 731 (1984) Matthew S. BENTO v. I.T.O. CORPORATION OF RHODE ISLAND. Civ. A. No. 83-0100 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. December 12, 1984. *732 *733 Cooper Associates, David A. Cooper, Providence, R.I., for plaintiff. Gaston Snow & Ely Bartlett, Douglas
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937-06-30 · Published · cited 24× · 107 S.W.2d 68; 341 Mo. 341; 1937 Mo. LEXIS 431
This is an action originally instituted for the recovery of $47,967.50 as rents under a lease and for $42,778.16 for taxes assessed against the demised premises for which, under the lease, defendant was obligated but had failed to pay and for the appointment of a receiver to collect the income from premises. The bill was later amended asking that the lease on such premises be canceled and that possession be delivered to the owners. The decree of the chancellor below was for plaintiffs and the
Texas Supreme Court · 1925-12-10 · Published · cited 62× · 277 S.W. 1036; 115 Tex. 149; 1925 Tex. LEXIS 148
The Court of Civil Appeals of the Second Supreme Judicial District certifies the question "whether or not the trial court erred in overruling the plea in abatement presented by appellant" in this case under the following statement: "On September 29, 1922, G.M. Rhoades, C.E. Christie and C. Groves, as members of the co-partnership doing business under the name of Rhoades Drilling Company, instituted this suit against the Paragon Oil Syndicate (a common law company), John F. Nein, truste