Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mattson v. Johnson”
Mattson v. Montana Power Co.public domain
JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Plaintiffs are a group of landowners or former landowners with properties on the shores of Flathead Lake and a portion of the upper Flathead River (Landowners). They commenced the instant action in 1999 in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, a
Peterson v. Commerce Bank, N.A. (In Re Mattson)public domain
448 B.R. 540 (2011) In re Gary Clayton MATTSON, Debtor. Andrea Peterson, Plaintiff, v. Commerce Bank, N.A., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 10-23636. Adversary No. 11-6073. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. March 28, 2011. *542 Michael A. Millett, Law Offices of Michael A. Millett PA, Kansas City, MO, Steven R. McConnell,
OPINION JOHNSON, Judge. Jerry Expose, Jr., was convicted of the criminal offense of making a terroristic threat during an anger-management counseling session. His mental-health therapist, Nina Mattson, disclosed his threatening statements to a police officer, prosecutors, and the jury in Expose’s criminal trial. In this civil action, Expose alleges that Mat
Mattson Technology v. Applied Materialspublic domain
Filed 11/1/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, A165378 v. APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., (Alameda County Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. 22CV007997) After many years at Applied Materials, Inc. (Applied), Canfeng Lai left for a ne
Stacey E. Frerichs v. Arthur Mattsonpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 24, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-1848 Lower Tribunal No. 22-CA-177-M ________________ Stacey E. Frerichs, et al., Appellants,
Mattson Technology, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc.public domain
Filed 11/20/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE A165378 MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC., (Alameda County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 22CV007997) v. ORDER DENYING A
Underhill v. Mattsonpublic domain
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice. [¶ 1.] Ron Underhill appeals the circuit court’s denial of his claims for quiet title and conversion in relation to a garage located on his land. The circuit court denied these claims after determining that Carmen Walton and Rocky and Barbara Mattson (collectively, “Defendants”) acquired the garage and a small area of land surrounding it (collectively,
In Re Mattsonpublic domain
468 B.R. 361 (2012) In re Robbyn Dale MATTSON and Renee Diane Mattson, Debtors. Robbyn Dale Mattson; Renee Diane Mattson, Appellants, v. David M. Howe, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. WW-11-1478-JuHKi. Bankruptcy No. 10-50455. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 23, 2012. Decided April 5, 2012.
In re: Robbyn Dale Mattson and Renee Diane Mattsonpublic domain
FILED 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED APR 05 2012 SUSAN M SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL O F TH E N IN TH C IR C U IT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5 6
Erickson v. Johnson Controls, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. The instant case arises from a construction site accident in Waltham, Massachusetts in October, 2009. The injured party has sued three entities for negligence,- one of whom has moved to dismiss the claim against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That motion is currently pending before the Court. I. Background At
In re: LEFEVER MATTSONpublic domain
FILED JUN 29 2026 ORDERED PUBLISHED SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 06-2-09015-8, Garold E. Johnson, J., entered June 8, 2012. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Bjorgen, A.C.J., concurred in by Hunt and Maxa, JJ.
In Re Personal Restraint of Mattsonpublic domain
214 P.3d 141 (2009) In Matter of PERSONAL RESTRAINT Petition OF Mark David MATTSON, Respondent. No. 81324-8. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued January 13, 2009. Decided August 20, 2009. *143 Alex A. Kostin, Criminal Justice Division, Gregory Joseph Rosen, John Joseph Samson, Office of the Attorney General, Cri
Thomas Mattson v. Caterpillar, Inc.public domain
FLAUM, Chief Judge. In 2001, Thomas Mattson filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that his employer, Caterpillar, Inc., retaliated against him in response to a charge of sexual harassment that he had filed with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (“IDHR”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). The district court granted Cater
Hafdahl v. Johnsonpublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: In 1986, Randal Wayne Hafdahl was convicted of murder in a Texas state court and sentenced to death for killing a police officer. The conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal. Hafdahl now seeks federal habeas corpus relief. He contends that his constitutional rights were violated, both in the guilt phase and the punishment phase of his state t
In re the Personal Restraint of Mattsonpublic domain
Alexander, C.J. ¶27 (dissenting) — I dissent because, in my view, the majority errs in upholding the decision of the Department of Corrections (DOC) denying Mark Mattson’s sixth plan for release to community custody. In my judgment DOC wrongly adhered to its policy directive, which provided in part that a release plan is insufficient in cases where DOC’s expert concludes that the party submitting
In Re Mattsonpublic domain
241 B.R. 629 (1999) In re Reynold MATTSON and Patricia Mattson, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 99-42865. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. November 30, 1999. *630 Thomas F. Miller, Minneapolis, MN, for debtor. Thomas Johnson, Chapter 13 Trustee, Minneapolis, MN, for trustee. Melissa Hortman, Gregory Luce, Luce & Ho
Mattson, Thomas v. Caterpillar Incpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-2495 THOMAS MATTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
State Ex Rel. Mattson v. Colonpublic domain
194 N.W.2d 574 (1972) STATE of Minnesota, by Robert W. MATTSON, its Attorney General, Appellant, City of Albert Lea, Petitioner, v. Vernon R. COLON et al., Respondents-below, J. D. Kelley and J. W. Morgan, as partners, d.b.a. Kelley and Morgan Associates, Respondents. No. 42814. Supreme Court of Minnesota. January 21, 1972. *575
People v. Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL RAYMOND JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant. S070250 Ventura County Superior Court CR 39376 January 3, 2022 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sak