Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Maurice Higgins”
Higgins v. Higginspublic domain
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge. [[Appellant Maurice Higgins appeals the February 10, 2009 corrected and substituted order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court finding that a constructive trust should be placed on the property located at 14416 West Baseline Road. Appellant argues that appellee lacked standing to bring the lawsuit, that the issue of constructive trust is barred by laches, and that the evidence did
Higgins v. Owenspublic domain
13 P.3d 837 (2000) Joseph W. HIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill OWENS, Governor of State of Colorado, and Richard A. Wehmhoefer, Executive Director for Commission on Judicial Discipline, Defendants-Appellees. No. 98CA2346. Colorado Court of Appeals, Division A. May 11, 2000. Certiorari Denied November 28, 2000. Joseph W. Higgins, Pro Se
United States v. Kevin Maurice Robertspublic domain
FAGG, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Kevin Maurice Roberts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and use of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The district judge sentenced Roberts to 138 months imprisonment. Roberts appeals and we affirm.
Maurice Johnson v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
02/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 10, 2017 Session MAURICE JOHNSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 12-CR-554 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge ___________________________________
Maurice Johnson v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
02/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 10, 2017 Session MAURICE JOHNSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 12-CR-554 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge ___________________________________
Prescott v. Higginspublic domain
538 F.3d 32 (2008) Fitzroy PRESCOTT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. David HIGGINS, Individually and in his capacity as Director of Central Fleet Maintenance, City of Boston Department of Public Works; City of Boston, Defendants, Appellees, Jerry Coughlin, Individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of Central Fleet Maintenance, City of Boston, Department of Public Works, Defendant. No. 07-2809. Un
Maurice Mitchell v. Doug Dretkepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <
Commonwealth v. Jonespublic domain
WOLOHOJIAN, J. *642 *804 This interlocutory appeal stems from motions to suppress 1 that the defendant filed in anticipation of his thi
Maurice v. National Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The difficulty with requiring Johanna Maurice, Business Editor of the Charleston Daily Mail, to exhaust her administrative remedies is the lack of any effective administrative remedy that can address the objections that she has raised to the subpoena. Title 29 U.S.C. § 161(1) authorizes the Board, upon petition, to revoke a subpoena “if in its opinion the evidence whose prod
Commonwealth v. Jonespublic domain
Lenk, J. The defendant was convicted by a Superior Court jury of murder in the first degree on theories of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty in connection with the shoot *308 ing death of Dinoriss Alston on April, 17, 2012. 1 </
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higginspublic domain
195 P.3d 645 (2008) WARNE INVESTMENTS, LTD., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Sandra HIGGINS and Dennis Higgins, wife and husband; Bridge Info Tech, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Defendants/Appellants. No. 1 CA-CV 06-0410. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. April 15, 2008. Review Denied September 23, 2008.
State of Tennessee v. Maurice Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 26, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MAURICE JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. M-08-456 Amy Reedy, Judge No. E2010-01142-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 16, 2011 A Bradley County jury convicted the Defendant, Maurice Johnson, of one count of especially aggrav
OPINION ON REHEARING BECKER, Circuit Judge. This criminal appeal is before us for the second time. In our previous disposition we affirmed the conviction of the defendants for substantive violations of 29 U.S.C. § 186 (labor representatives’ acceptance of payments from employers) and for conspiracy to viola
Higgins v. Melnickpublic domain
Order affirmed. Spaulding, J., absent.
OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals present challenges by two officials of Teamsters Local 929, Maurice Schurr and Harry Rosetsky, to convictions for substantive violations of 29 U.S.C. § 186 and for conspiracy to violate that statute. Appellants make two principal contenti
Charles, Maurice Jabarr v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2003 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2003. In The
Opinion filed July 20, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00133-CV __________ ELIZABETH J. SIBLEY, AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JANE DUNN SIBLEY, ET AL., Appellants V. ROBERT BECHTEL; W. BURGESS WADE; SARA BULLOCK MCINTOSH, AS INDEPENDENT CO-EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE
Higgins v. Politopublic domain
This is an action in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a fall upon the defective sidewalk of property belonging to defendant, Joseph Polito. Plaintiff instituted suit against James S. Huey and Elizabeth Huey, individually and trading and doing business at Huey's Markets, and Polito. The court below correctly granted a compulsory non-suit in favor of the former defendants, and the case was submitted to a jury in order to determine whether or not the defendant Pol
LAY, Circuit Judge. The State of Nebraska appeals from a conditional order of the district court issuing a writ of habeas corpus. 1 Petitioner asserted, in support of his habeas corpus petition, that his conviction in the state district court for breaking and entering was b
Moberg v. 33T LLCpublic domain
666 F.Supp.2d 415 (2009) Håkan MOBERG, Plaintiff, v. 33T LLC, Cedric Leygues, and Erwan Leygues, Defendants. Civil No. 08-625(NLH)(JS). United States District Court, D. Delaware. October 6, 2009. *417 Stephen B. Brauerman, Peter B. Ladig, The Bayard Firm, Wilmington, DE, Autumn J. Witt (pro hac vice), Maurice Harmon (pro hac vice