Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “May v. Smith”
Smith v. Maypublic domain
[Cite as Smith v. May, 2019-Ohio-4846.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: DARRYL SMITH : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Petitioner : H
Jerry May, Perry May, David May, Vernell May Espa, and Irma May Taylor v. cooper/t. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc.public domain
JERRY MAY, PERRY MAY, * NO. 2024-CA-0272 DAVID MAY, VERNELL MAY ESPA, AND IRMA MAY * COURT OF APPEAL TAYLOR * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA COOPER/T. SMITH STEVEDORING COMPANY, * INC., ET AL.
Jerry May, Perry May, David May, Vernell May Espa, and Irma May Taylor v. cooper/t. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc.public domain
JERRY MAY, PERRY MAY, * NO. 2024-CA-0272 DAVID MAY, VERNELL MAY ESPA, AND IRMA MAY * TAYLOR COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * COOPER/T. SMITH STATE OF LOUISIANA STEVEDORING COMPANY, ******* INC., ET AL.
Smith v. May (Slip Opinion)public domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Smith v. May, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-61.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or oth
Marty May Smith v. The State of Wyomingpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2021 WY 28 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2020 February 12, 2021 MARTY MAY SMITH, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-19-0226 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court of Crook C
Amended May 5, 2016 State of Iowa v. Trent D. Smithpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–1202 Filed March 4, 2016 Amended May 5, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. TRENT D. SMITH, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Jeffrey L. Harris, Judge. Defendant appeals from conviction for domestic abuse assault causing bodily injury. D
May v. Statepublic domain
RITA W. GRUBER, Judge 11 Jimmy Dewayne May was charged in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County with simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms, possession of methamphetamine, possession of firearms by certain persons, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was arrested in the parking lot of a Fort Smith sporting-goods store after having purchased magazi
Morgan Cnty. v. Maypublic domain
NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. *366Morgan County appeals the trial court's order dismissing Christine May's criminal citation for violating the County's amended zoning ordinance by renting out her house near Lake Oconee for a week. The court concluded that the zoning ordinance in effect at the time May began renting her house for short periods was
May v. Solomonpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Anthony May appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his challenges to his disciplinary convictions for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and dismissing without prejudice the remainder of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for fai
May v. Strainpublic domain
ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. • Before the Court is Rodney “Jack” Strain, Jr. (“Strain”) and Lindsey “Scott” Crain’s (“Crain”) (collectively, “Officer Defendants”) “Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”1 Defendants Walgreens Louisiana Co. (“Walgreens”), K & B Louisiana Corp. (“K
May v. Buckpublic domain
OPINION Opinion By Justice MOSELEY. In a single-issue bench trial, the trial court determined that the property description contained in a letter agreement between appellant Randall Clayton May and appellee William “Bill” Buck did not satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. BACKGROUND On January 20, 200
Smith v. May Department Store, Co.public domain
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for the injuries that she sustained when she slipped and fell on a wet floor just inside the entrance of defendant’s store. Contrary to the argument of plaintiff, defendant “ ‘satisfied its burden of establishing prima facie that it did not * * * have * * *
Jeannie May v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCpublic domain
WRIGHT, District Judge. Appellee/Cross-Appellant Jeannie K. May commenced this action to recover damages under state and federal law arising from the debt-collection practices of Appellant/Cross-Appellee N ationstar Mortgage, Inc. A jury found in favor of May on her invasion-of-privacy claim and her claim that Nationstar negligently violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The ju
State v. Smithpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2024-Ohio-2358.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 112882, 112908, v. : and 112910 BRITTANY SMITH, ET AL.,
State v. Smithpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2023-Ohio-4315.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 112567, 112568, v. : 112569, and 112570 EMMANUEL SMITH,
May v. Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered March 8, 2016. The order, *1658 inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Hari Gopal, M.D., for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against him. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is
May v. Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered January 22, 2016. The order, inter alia, converted the motion of defendant Hari Gopal, M.D., to dismiss the amended complaint against him to a motion for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in May v Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P. ([appeal No. 2] 151 AD
Nicolescu v. Smithpublic domain
[Cite as Nicolescu v. Smith, 2023-Ohio-3610.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY BOGDAN NICOLESCU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROSS T. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
May v. Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered January 22, 2016. The order, inter alia, converted the motion of defendant Hari Gopal, M.D., to dismiss the amended complaint against him to a motion for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in May v Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P. ([appeal No. 2] 151 AD
May v. Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered January 22, 2016. The order, inter alia, converted the motion of defendant Hari Gopal, M.D., to dismiss the amended complaint against him to a motion for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in May v Buffalo MRI Partners, L.P. ([appeal No. 2] 151 AD