Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CSX Transportation, Inc. filed this action against the Aabama Department of Revenue and Julie P. Magee, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department (collectively, “the State” or “Aa-bama”), seeking relief under Section 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. § 11501 (the “4-R Act”). Doc.

OPINION OF THE COURT Diane A. Lebedeff, J. Currently, torrents of no-fault litigation deluge New York courts and no-fault requests for accelerated judgment swell our motion calendars.1 Adding to the turmoil is that no-fault summary judgment motions pose undeniable difficulties, in large part, because traditional summary judgment formulations give poor guidance for their ready

578 F.Supp. 748 (1983) John G. GLOVER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert H. LIBMAN, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. C79-2009A. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. November 29, 1983. *749 *750 David A. Rabin & Joseph R. Manning, Morris & Manning, Atlanta, Ga., for

683 F.Supp.2d 225 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and The Vulcan Society, Inc., Marcus Haywood, Candido NuÑez, Roger Gregg, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Fire Department of the City of New York, New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg and New York City Fire Commissioner Nicholas Scoppetta, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants.

575 So.2d 16 (1990) Frank MACKBEE a/k/a Frankie Lee Mackbee v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 03-DP-0089. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 27, 1990. *18 Robert O. Allen, Allen Allen & Boutwell, Brookhaven, Dennis L. Horn, Horn & Payne, Jackson, for appellant. Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., Marvin L. White, Jr., Asst. Att

681 F.Supp. 549 (1988) P.M.F. SERVICES, INC. and Richard Rueth, Plaintiffs, v. Daniel J. GRADY, Lynn Grady, Mount Greenwood Bank, and The Northern Trust Company, Defendants. No. 87 C 9113. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. March 10, 1988. *550 Michael R. Collins, Harold E. Collins & Assocs., Ltd., Chicago, Ill

Plaintiff-appellant, Forrest R. Jaynes, sued appellees-defendants, Ollie Lee and his father, Frank Lee, for damages growing out of an automobile-pickup collision on a farm-to-market road in Lamar County, Texas, which collision occurred on September 19, 1955, between 7 and 8 o'clock, a. m. Trial was to a jury, and at the conclusion of the evidence the trial court instructed a verdict in favor of appellee Frank Lee and that action of the trial court is not challenged on this appeal.

*265MEMORANDUM OF DECISION TEMPLAR, District Judge. On May 29, 1968, plaintiff Wilson filed a complaint in this Court under provisions of 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706; 20 U.S.C. § 107; 28 U.S.C. § 1361; 28 U.S.C. § 2201; and Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The action bears Clerk’s number KC-2793. He alleged that his claim has a value of more t

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant S. Sam Caldwell appeals from his conviction below on six counts of mail fraud, one count of violating the federal statute prohibiting the destruction of a vessel upon the high seas for the purpose of injuring the vessel’s insurer, and one count of conspiring to destroy that vessel. After the district court denied his motions for a new trial or for judgment of acquittal and i

776 F.2d 989 19 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 537 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.S. Sam CALDWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-8208. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 21, 1985. William A. Morrison, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

456 So.2d 209 (1984) Lum CUMBEST v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 53799. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 16, 1984. *211 Frank J. Hammond, Jr., Moss Point, William Liston, Liston, Gibson & Lancaster, Winona, for appellant. Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Marvin L. White, Jr., Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

1. The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to show that the fire was of incendiary origin and that the defendant was the guilty party. 2. The special grounds are without merit. DECIDED OCTOBER 15, 1947. ADHERED TO ON REHEARING DECEMBER 16, 1947. Bonnie Lockhart was convicted of arson in the burning of the dwelling house of Addie Gordon, alias Missie Maze. The defendant filed his amended motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and on this judgment

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20

457 So.2d 1298 (1984) TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPELINE CORPORATION v. The STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI and Coastal Exploration, Inc., et al. No. 55071. Supreme Court of Mississippi. September 5, 1984. Rehearing Denied October 3, 1984. *1304 John M. Grower, Jefferson D. Stewart, R. Wilson Montjoy, II, Bruni

200 Md. 145 (1952) 88 A.2d 450 LICHTENBERG ET UX. v. SACHS (Two Appeals in One Record) [No. 163, October Term, 1951.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 9, 1952. The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ. Linwood L. Clark for Jerome Lichtenberg. Noah A. Hillman

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE 3198) (the “Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, response, reply, supplemental memoranda, and the documents attached to them, as well as the parties’ voluminous evidentiary su

319 U.S. 715 (1943) OWENS, EXECUTRIX, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. No. 580. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 7, 1943. Decided June 14, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Mr. Frank C. Hanley for petitioner. Mr. L.R. Hamblen, with whom Mr. Roy F. Shields was on the brief, fo

NEWMAN, District Judge. Since the argument of this case, and since the briefs were furnished me by the counsel respectively, I have endeavored to find an opportunity to go through this record. I have recently been able to do so, and have gone very carefully through the evidence, books, documents, and oral testimony. On January 3, 1914, I made a brief opinion in this case on the questions then arising, and I