Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge. Plaintiff Kathryn McCauley (“McCauley”) brought the instant employment discrimination lawsuit against Defendants Akal Security, Inc. (“Akal”) and the United States Marshals Service (“the USMS”). Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on various grounds. For the reasons contained herein, Defendants’ Motion i

58 F.Supp.2d 1232 (1999) Alex S. McCAULEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 98-2538-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 2, 1999. *1233 Jeffrey Axelrad, Paul F. Figley, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, DC, Jean Paul Bradshaw, II, Lathrop & Gage L.C., Kansas City, MO, f

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (Citibank) appeal from the district court’s order dismissing the consolidated complaint of several underlying state court lawsuits under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and remanding these state suits to the courts from which they were removed. We must decide two questions. First, whether the minimum amount in controv

460 N.W.2d 728 (1990) Henry W. LEWTON and Mary E. Lewton, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Charles H. McCAULEY, Defendant and Appellee. Nos. 16813, 16846. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs May 22, 1990. Decided August 29, 1990. Rodney C. Lefholz, Rapid City, for plaintiffs and appellants. Jeffrey P. Maks, Finch, Viken, Viken &a;

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 15, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-0410 Lower Tribunal No. F21-1478 ________________ William Alexander McCauley, Appellant,

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13296 MARTIN McCAULEY vs. SUPERINTENDENT, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTIONAL INSTIT

DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J. — OPINION AUTHOR • Montia McCauley filed a Rule 29.12(c) nunc pro tunc motion regarding his six- *594 year-old judgment of conviction. 1 The motion was denied, McCauley appeale

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. EDWARD LITTLETON MCCAULEY, Appellant. No. CR-20-0031-AP Filed May 15, 2026 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Frank W. Mos

537 U.S. 1 (2002) FORD MOTOR CO. ET AL. v. McCAULEY ET AL. No. 01-896. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 7, 2002. Decided October 15, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Seth P. Waxman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Walter E. Dellinger, John H. Beisner, B

190 Cal.App.3d 981 (1987) 235 Cal. Rptr. 732 MICHAEL McCAULEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. D004228. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. March 30, 1987. *983 COUNSEL Miller & Frisch, Morton Frisch, Jeffrey Glasser

349 S.W.3d 688 (2011) In re LOUISIANA TEXAS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. and Merensy Reef Hospital Corporation, Relators. No. 14-11-00503-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 11, 2011. George D. Gordon, Conroe, Eric Yollick, The Woodlands, Levin J. Benton, Houston, for Relators. R. Michael McCauley, Jr., Lubbock, Patrick Zummo, Houston, Gene J

688 F.Supp.2d 367 (2010) Jeffrey E. PERELMAN, et al. v. Raymond PERELMAN, et al. Civil Action No. 09-4792. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 12, 2010. *369 James T. Smith, Rebecca D. Ward, Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Jeffrey E. Perelman, et al. Brian P. Flaherty, Geo

Rickman, Judge. Homeowner James Roberts filed a complaint against JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association (“Chase”), and Associated Credit Union (“ACU”), alleging claims for breach of contract, emotional distress, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, punitive damages, and attorney fees. The trial court, in two separate orders, granted separate motions to dismiss filed by Chase

MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, District Judge A chief executive officer leaving his long-time employer for a competitor now seeks to avoid his agreement to repay a portion of a conditional $1.75 million incentive award because the governing award agreement allows him to retain the award if he retires under a written retirement policy or if his former employer decides he retired. Otherwise, he must return a pro rata

TARANTO, Circuit Judge. In January 2013, Asetek Danmark A/S sued two parties — Cooler Master USA, Inc., which a month later became CMI USA Inc.; and Cooler Master Co., Ltd., a Taiwanese company — in the Northern District of California, asserting infringement of two of Asetek’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764. All of the accused products are branded “Cooler Ma

272 S.W.3d 285 (2008) Jeffrey L. LAGUD, Respondent, v. KANSAS CITY MISSOURI BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, Angela Wassan-Hunt, President; James Wilson, Vice President; Terry Brady, Treasurer; Karl Zobrist, and Mayor Kay Barnes, Appellants. No. WD 68763. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 7, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme

600 F.3d 900 (2010) German C. SINISTERRA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 08-1925. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 15, 2009. Filed: April 1, 2010. *902 Timothy M. Gabrielsen, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Tucson, AZ, argued (Jon M. Sands, Fed. Public Defende

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge Plaintiff Swift Spindrift Ltd. (“Swift”) brings this suit against two sets of insurance underwriters — referred to as the “Seascope Defendants,” the “B&P Defendants,” and, collectively, “the Underwriters” — and a marine insurance broker, Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. (“Gallagher”). Swift, the owner of a bulk cargo vessel known as the

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Asia Vital Components Co. ("AVC") and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Asetek Danmark A/S. ECF Nos. 180, 186. Asetek has also filed several requests to strike. ECF No. 185. The Court will grant the motions to strike in part, grant Asetek's motion for partial summary judgment, and deny AVC's motio

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF Re: ECF Nos. 234, 235, 236 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge This patent infringement case was tried to a jury in December 2014. ECF No. 189. On December 17, 2014, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Ase-tek Danmark A/S, finding that Defendant CMI USA, Inc.’s products infringed