Cases

Affirmed and Opinion filed February 16, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00755-CV DONOVAN MITTELSTED, Appellant V. DENISE MCCLURE MERIWETHER AND DARLA MCCLURE SANDS, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 & Probate Court Brazoria County, Texas

PER CURIAM. hln 1986, appellant Charles Weekly entered a plea of guilty to rape and kidnapping charges in the Pulaski County Circuit Court in both case No. 60CR-86-299 and case No. 60CR-86-874. He was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment in each of the cases for rape and a term often years’ imprisonment in each case for kidnapping.

498 So.2d 892 (1986) Daniel SPARKMAN, Petitioner, v. Charles D. McCLURE, Jr., etc., Respondent. No. 68020. Supreme Court of Florida. November 26, 1986. *893 Daniel Sparkman, in Pro Per. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Mark C. Menser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent. McDONALD, Chief Justice. The First

PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation and from the trial court’s upward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We affirm the revocation of probation. It is clear that defendant violated a material condition of his probation by his convictions for sale and possession of marijuana with the intent to sell. The other reasons given in the order revoking probation were either

ON SECOND PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he is entitled to reasonable bail and that the trial court erred in ordering pretrial detention. We agree. Petitioner is charged by information with two violations of section 800.04(2), Florida Statutes, by commission of sexual acts upon a child under 16 years of age. By an e

MILLS, Judge. Sparkman seeks review of the denial of his petition for writ of prohibition and order to show cause. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether after a denial by a court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(d)(3), of a motion to discharge, the time for commencement of trial is measured from the point when the order is announced in open court or the date when the written order is entered.

549 So.2d 1157 (1989) Edwin C. McCLURE, Jr., Appellant, v. PAINEWEBBER, INCORPORATED, Appellee. No. 89-1076. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 10, 1989. Gilbride, Heller & Brown and Dyanne E. Feinberg, Michael D. Lozoff, Miami, for appellant. *1158 Patricia E. Cowart and Steven M. Greenbaum a

575 So.2d 176 (1991) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Corrine McCLURE, Respondent. No. 64093. Supreme Court of Florida. January 17, 1991. Rehearing Denied March 13, 1991. John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Diane Victor Kuenzel, Bar Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.

162 S.W.3d 346 (2005) Fredrick E. McCLURE, Appellant, v. James Richard DENHAM, Individually, d/b/a Denham Builders and d/b/a DWM Developments, Garrett Denham, Individually and d/b/a DWM Developments, Brian Martin, Individually and d/b/a DWM Developments, and Eric (Ric) Walters, Individually and d/b/a DWM Developments, Appellees. No. 2-04-170-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. <

662 N.W.2d 566 (2003) 266 Neb. 90 Toni E. McCLURE, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Wilton and Eileen FORSMAN and Crossroads Farms, Inc., Appellees and Cross-Appellants. No. S-02-414. Supreme Court of Nebraska. June 6, 2003. *568 Lyle Joseph Koenig, of Koenig Law Firm, and William D. Sutter, of Stephens &a;

501 So.2d 141 (1987) STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant, v. Anna P. McCLURE, Individually and As Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Alexander Mcclure, Deceased, Appellee. No. 86-889. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 23, 1987. *142 Bruce D. Aus

135 F.Supp.2d 66 (2001) Zeke WILSON and Wilson Promotional Group, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Wilbert J. McCLURE, William F. Pender, and Nicholas P. Manzello, Defendants. Civ.A. No. 98-12299-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 30, 2001. *67 *68 *

225 S.W.3d 658 (2006) WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION OUTBOUND, Appellant, v. Victoria McCLURE, Appellee. No. 08-05-00166-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. October 19, 2006. Rehearing Overruled November 29, 2006. *661 Jane M.N. Webre, Scott, Douglass & McConnico, LLP, Austin, for appellant. John P

*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission adopts with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the fol

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION ) OUTBOUND, )

OPINION OF THE COURT This case concerns: 1.) whether the penalty which is assessed against the recovery of a worker whose injury results from the willful violation of a known safety rule is computed as 15% of the entire award or 15% of that portion of the award to be paid by the employer, and 2.) if the penalty applies to the entire award, whether the Special Fund is entitled to receive a proportional share of the penalty. KRS 342.165.<

697 N.E.2d 1277 (1998) Crystal HAXTON, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. McCLURE OIL CORPORATION, Appellee-Defendant. No. 52A02-712-CV-831. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 4, 1998. *1279 William F. Berkshire, Berkshire Law Firm, Peru, for appellant. Jeffry G. Price, Peru, for appellee.

PER CURIAM. Southeast Recycling Corporation and Royal Insurance Company, the employer/carrier (E/C), appeal a nonfinal discovery order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) that compels production of the densifier machine that Beverly McClure, Claimant, was cleaning when she was injured. Because section 440.39(7), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that the employee, employer, and carrier have a duty to cooperate

ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge. Carol McClure n/k/a Carol Willis (Mother) appeals the judgment of the trial court modifying the physical custody schedule and ordering an abatement of Richard TefFs (Father) child support obligation. *155Mother argues that the court erred in (1) setting forth alternate visitation schedules based on whether the parties are resid

344 So.2d 675 (1977) Edward Bryant JINKS, Individually, etc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James W. McCLURE et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 5840. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 4, 1977. *676 Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Carwile & Barsh by James E. Williams, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellants Allstate and McC