Cases

134 F.Supp.2d 978 (2001) John B. McCORMICK, Ed Benesch, Bennie Jackson and Steve Pocztowski, Plaintiffs, v. Gerald ZERO and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants. No. 00 C 2750. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 23, 2001. Paul L. Strauss, Steven Arthur Mange, Miner Barnhill & Galland, Chicago, IL, Sarah

110 F.Supp.2d 716 (2000) John B. McCORMICK, Ed Benesch, Bennie Jackson and Steve Pocztowski, Plaintiffs, v. Gerald ZERO and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants. No. 00 C 2750. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 23, 2000. *717 Paul L. Strauss, Steven Arthur Mange, Miner

30 Kan. App.2d 1240 (2002) 57 P.3d 30 GARRY and SUSAN RASKIN, individually and as Next Friends of KALEY RASKIN, a minor, and VICTOR and JANET TURNBAUGH, individually, and as Next Friends of JENNA TURNBAUGH, a minor, Appellants, v. KEN ALLISON and KAREN ALLISON, personally and as Guardians Ad Litem of CHAD LEATHERS, a minor, Appellees. No. 88,409. Court of Appeals of Kansas.<

307 F.3d 1339 Ann M. MCCORMICK, Petitioner,v.DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent. No. 02-3031. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: October 4, 2002. Ann M. McCormick, of Oklahoma City, OK, pro se. Allison A. Page, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Di

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC ORDER A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc was filed by the RESPONDENT, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the PETITIONER. The petition for rehearing and response was referred first to the merits panel that heard this appeal, and thereafter,

04/21/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 28, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENDALL ALLISON CLARK Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamblen County No. 17CR076 Alex Pearson, Judge No. E2019-00515-CCA-R3-CD The Defendant, K

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. On March 23,1988, Allison Williams, plaintiff in the district court and appellant here, was injured when he was struck by a “tool-holder” that came loose from a vertical milling machine. At the time, Williams was working in Massachusetts for R & K Precision Tool Company (“R & K”). The vertical milling machine, owned by R & K, had been made in 1

654 S.E.2d 628 (2007) ALLISON v. The STATE. No. A07A0828. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 20, 2007. *629 Thomas S. Robinson III, for appellant. Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Stephany J. Luttrell, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. SMITH, Presiding Judge. Following a bench trial, Keith A

OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. This case requires the balancing of First Amendment rights with the right to cast a ballot that is both tabulated and undiluted. Those voting rights are achieved by safeguarding the integrity of the ballot box against fraud, intimidation, and other degradations of the electoral process. Plaintiffs John Russell

206 N.W.2d 893 (1973) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Richard Bruce ALLISON, Appellant. No. 55454. Supreme Court of Iowa. April 25, 1973. Hugh W. Lundy, Albia, for appellant. Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., Robert D. Jacobson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James D. Jenkins, Monroe County Atty., for appellee. Submitted to MOORE, C. J., and MASON, LeGRAND, UHLENHOPP

MANSFIELD, Justice. This case presents the question whether a subcontractor that properly performs electrical work on a jobsite, then locks up the work and transfers control to the property owner, owes a duty of care to an employee of the owner electrocuted six days later when the owner fails to deener-gize the work site in contravention of various warnings and regulations. We conclude that no such duty is owed under the circu

98 S.W.3d 227 (2002) Ronald ALLISON/Fire Insurance Exchange, Appellants, v. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a Member of the Farmers Insurance Group/Mary Melinda Ballard and Ronald Allison, Individually and as Next Friends for Reese Allison, a Minor, Appellees. No. 03-01-00717-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. December 19, 2002. Rehearing Overruled February 13 and

Fish, J. Suit was brought, in a justice’s court, by the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company against Nathan Allison and Frank Walraven, on one of a series of notes given by the defend*446ants to the plaintiff for the purchase-price of a corn-binder. Upon ■a trial by jury a vérdict was rendered for the defendants. Plaintiff sued out a certiorari, and to a judgment of the

Opinion, Mr. Justice Williams : The plaintiff below brought suit to recover damages for the loss of her husband, who was killed while in the service of the defendant company. Her case is a sad one, but her right to recover must rest un a legal liability of the employer or her-action must fail. The evidence shows that the Allison Manufacturing Company is largely engaged in the manufacture of c

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00717-CV Ronald Allison/Fire Insurance Exchange, Appellant

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from lawsuits filed by three different groups of plaintiffs against Ticor Title Insurance Company (“Ticor”). Jurisdiction in the district court was based on diversity. Defendant Ticor is a California corporation, and the plaintiffs are all residents of states other than California. Jurisdiction in this court exists as an appeal from final judgment as to all cla

Pope, Judge. Richard Hugo Allison appeals from a jury verdict and judgment of conviction on one count of child molestation. Held: The trial evidence showed that appellant and his ex-wife had been divorced for three years. There were two daughters, ages seven and fourteen, as issue of that marriage. Their mother was awarded custody and appellant regularly exercised overnight visitation privileges on altern

Hallmark appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for new trial, which alleged juror misconduct in considering evidence not presented at trial. I would affirm. On February 18, 1982, Conrad and Barbara Hallmark, and Keith Hallmark, a minor, by and through his next friend, Barbara Hallmark, filed a personal injury suit against Lester Allison in the Circuit Court for Jefferson County. The complaint alleged that Lester Allison negligently or wantonly operated a motor vehicle

208 N.J. Super. 9 (1985) 504 A.2d 1184 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY ALLISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ABRAHAM MICKENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted May 28, 1985. Decided August 30, 1985.

OPINION OF THE COURT Felice K Shea, J. The question presented by defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment against him is whether, at a time when his driver’s license was suspended, defendant was a “duly licensed” operator of an automobile for hire within the exceptions to subdivision 1 of section 220.25 and subdivision 3 of section 265.15 of the Penal Law and thus exempt from the statutory presumptions