Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “McDaniel v. Stevens”
Stevens v. McDanielpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
McDaniel v. McDanielpublic domain
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. Saleta Gay McDaniel (“the wife”) and Steven Ray McDaniel were married in 1998; no children were born of the parties’ marriage. On March 11, 2013, the wife filed a complaint in the Cherokee Circuit Court (“the trial court”) seeking a divorce; in her complaint, the wife alleged, among other things, that the husband had committed adultery. The wife sought an equitable division of the parties’ marital pr
McDaniel v. Statepublic domain
Per Curiam. AFFIRMED . Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
McDaniel v. Upsher-Smith Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS JON P. McCALLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Upsher-Smith Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, filed August 22, 2016. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background<
People v. McDanielpublic domain
13 N.Y.3d 751 (2009) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERMAR McDANIEL, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided September 1, 2009. *752 Legal Aid Society, Criminal Appeals Bureau, New York City (Arthur H. Hopkirk and Steven Banks of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson,
Hydrick v. McDanielpublic domain
500 F.3d 978 (2007) James Allen HYDRICK; David Lanphere; Shaundale Griffin; Frank Cisneros; Paul Pederson; Steven Robert Cerniglia; Gary Price; Daniel Mrowici; Kenneth Ciancio; Michael McClure; James Mata; Richard Bishop; Melvin Fields; Ron Lee; Leonard Pierre; Thomas Price; Jimmy Guthrie; Brian Kelly; Woodrow Jones; Vashon Jackson; Bruce Riley; Fred Scott; Dean Danforth; Sammy Page; James Peters; Grayling Mitchell; Carlos Saucedo; Anthony Dacayona; Char
John Snow v. E.K. McDanielpublic domain
OPINION B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: John Snow, a 69-year-old death-row inmate, appeals the grant of summary judgment denying his claims for violations of his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Snow claims that the doctors and wardens in the Nevada Department of Corrections were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs; specifically, the diagnosis
Tallon v. Lloyd & McDanielpublic domain
497 F.Supp.2d 847 (2007) Larry TALLON, Plaintiff v. LLOYD & McDANIEL et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06CV-314-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. July 20, 2007. *848 Ellen G. Friedman, Louisville, KY, Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, OH, Steven C. Shane, Bellevue, KY, for Plaintiff. <
McDaniel v. Ongpublic domain
724 N.E.2d 38 (1999) 311 Ill. App.3d 203 243 Ill.Dec. 729 David and Debra McDANIEL, as Guardians of Pamela McDaniel, a Disabled Person, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Anita ONG, Defendant-Appellee (California Gardens Nursing Center, DH1, Inc., and CD1, Inc., Defendants). No. 1-98-3437. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division.
McDaniel v. City of Rocky Mountpublic domain
*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Rideout and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commiss
Slack v. McDanielpublic domain
Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Souter and Justice Breyer join, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. With respect to the issue resolved in Part II of the Court’s opinion, I agree with the Courts of Appeals that have held that the pre-AEDPA version of 28 U. S. C. § 2253 governs the right to appeal with respect to an appeal noticed after the effective date of AEDPA in a habeas corpus proceedi
People v. McDanielpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DON’TE LAMONT MCDANIEL, Defendant and Appellant. S171393 Los Angeles County Superior Court No. TA074274-01 August 26, 2021 Justice Liu authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Saka
William W. Reed v. Bill McDaniel And Ahmad Elsebaepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 22, 2010 Session WILLIAM W. REED v. BILL MCDANIEL and AHMAD ELSEBAE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C 07-166 Div. I Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2009-01348-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 23, 2010 This is a premises liability case. Plaintiff/Appellant sustained injuries after
State v. McDanielpublic domain
Briscoe, C.J.: Patricia McDaniel appeals the denial of motions to modify sentences imposed following her pleas of guilty to possession of cocaine (K.S.A. 65-4127a) and failure to wear a seat belt (K.S.A. 8-2503). We apply a harmless error standard to the State’s breach of the plea agreement at the hearing on the motion to modify and reverse and remand for rehearing on both motions to modify. The sole issue pr
McDaniel v. Bieffe USA, Inc.public domain
35 F.Supp.2d 735 (1999) Tammi McDANIEL, individually and as trustee for the heirs and next of kin of Sandy McDaniel, Plaintiff, v. BIEFFE USA, INC., and Bieffe Helmets SRL, Defendants. No. Civ. 97-385 (JRT/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 4, 1999. *736 Robert P. Christensen and Steven W. Anderson, Dunkle
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Stevens and Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc., Gary Realty Company, Inc., Garfield Traub Development, LLC, and Turner Construction Company, Plaintiffs, Of Whom Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc., Gary Realty Company, Inc., and Garfield Traub Development, LLC, are Respondents, v. City of Columbia, Paul C. "Bo" Aughtry III, Windsor/Aughtry Co., Inc., Vista Hotel Partners, LLC,
Justice HEARN. This case arises from a grant of partial summary judgment in favor of an architectural firm finding a contract existed between it and the City of Columbia. On certiorari, the City concedes a contract exists, but argues the contract terms have been satisfied. We find the City’s arguments are unpreserved and affirm as modified. FACTUAL/PROCEDUR
Milgroom v. McDanielpublic domain
Chandler, Justice: James McDaniel (McDaniel) appeals a Circuit Court Order holding him in contempt. We affirm. *7FACTS In 1986, Respondent Walter Milgroom (Milgroom) obtained a $41,000 judgment against McDaniel. Unable to satisfy the judgment, he instituted supplemental proceedings to discover McDaniel’s assets. Circu
Avissato v. McDanielpublic domain
Avissato v McDaniel (2019 NY Slip Op 00084) Avissato v McDaniel 2019 NY Slip Op 00084 Decided on January 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
United States v. McDanielpublic domain
U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS ________________________ No. ACM 39608 ________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Steven A. MCDANIEL Jr. Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _________________