Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge Mary McDonald brings employment claims against the City of Wichita, Kansas and Gary Rebenstorf. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that Rebenstorf deprived her of First Amendment right to free speech and free association and denied her equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment in violation of 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. Plaintiff claims that t

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 16-1543 BARRY C. WITHERS, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued December 4, 2017 Deci

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and Illinois Official Reports integrity of this

636 F.3d 958 (2011) Terrie A. WITHERS; Alvin L. Smith, Appellants, v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., Appellee. No. 10-1191. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 14, 2010. Filed: March 4, 2011. *960 Cheryl Ann Pilate, argued, Olathe, KS, for appellant. Chris R. Pace, argued, Sar

821 So.2d 556 (2002) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Gerald WITHERS, Appellant. No. 36,001-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 12, 2002. *557 Todd Newman, Monroe, for Appellant. Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, Jerry Jones District Attorney, Geary Aycock, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellee. <

DECISION Plaintiff seeks by this complaint to reform two deeds in the chain of title to a parcel of land at 23 Gilson Road, Wellesley, comprised of lots 4 and 5 presently owned by her (“locus”). Plaintiff alleges that lot 5, an unregistered lot, was omitted from both deeds by the mistake of the named defendants to this action. The deeds, as written, conveyed and reconveyed lot 4, a registered lot. The plaintiff seeks to reform both de

8 Wn. App. 123 (1972) 504 P.2d 1151 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WESTON D. WITHERS, Appellant. No. 666-2. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two. December 20, 1972. Morgan Collins, for appellant. S. Brooke Taylor, Prosecuting Attorney, and Theodore E. Ripley, Deputy, for respondent.

507 P.2d 552 (1973) Danny WITHERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. A-17385. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. February 26, 1973. Keith Myers, Hollis, for appellant. Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Michael Cauthron, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daniel J. Gamino, Legal Intern, for appellee. *553 O

This is a will contest. The testator, Robert C. Withers, died on or about June 15, 1961. One H. E. Sproul, no relative but a friend of the testator, filed for probate in the County Court of Jeff Davis County a will of the deceased dated August 14, 1959, in which Sproul was named Independent Executor, which will was contested by Casey I. Whiters, a son of the deceased and his sole heir at law, alleging mental incapacity of the deceased and undue influence exerted upon the deceased by S

437 S.W.2d 818 (1969) William P. CLEMENTS, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. John T. WITHERS, III, Respondent. No. B-1017. Supreme Court of Texas. January 8, 1969. Rehearing Denied March 5, 1969. *819 Ritchie, Ritchie & Crosland, Robert F. Ritchie and Rhodes S. Baker, III, Dallas, for petitioners. Payne, Pa

Kirby, J., (after stating the facts). The opinion in Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Foster, ante p............., written by onr learned Chief Justice in a like case, handed down this date, is controlling in all respects herein. The policies and certificates of insurance herein do not, by express terms or by implication, make the giving of notice of the disability a con

Argued October 4, 1927. The City of New Castle, a city of the third class, filed this bill in equity against defendant, the owner of an apartment house therein, in which it prayed a decree requiring her to make certain changes in the plumbing in the building so that it will conform with the requirements of the Act of June 7, 1901, P. L. 493, known as the plumbing code, which was extended to cover cities of the third class by the Act of May 14, 1909, P. L. 840. The chancellor, after hearing, d

STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This suit involves the liability of appellant, Missouri State Life Insurance Company, under two certificates of insurance issued to appellee, Frank B. Withers, under two group policies covering employees of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company. One of the certificates indemnifies the appellee against loss of time by sickness not exceeding 26 consecutive *Page 1131 weeks; another certificate indemnifies him against to

Appeal dismissed, motion of appellant. *Page 698

DIIUMMOND, Circuit Judge. The cause of action, as set forth in the complaint, is, that on the 30th of July, 1S6S, the defendant became owner of ten shares of capital stock of the insurance company, and that the stock was issued and taken by the defendant upon the condition that twenty per cent, was to be paid in cash, and eighty per cent, was to be paid in case losses rendered its payment necessary; that these were the terms of th

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed, motion of appellant.

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice. Will A. McDonald was convicted of forgery in Hempstead County on October 4,1971, and was also convicted as an habitual criminal. From the judgment entered in conformity with the verdicts, appellant brings this appeal. The first three points for reversal are that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, contrary to the law, and contrary to both the law and the evid

*1082 JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Charles Bennett and James Belvedere owned most of the stock in Englewood Industries, a Colorado-based company that manufactured polyurethane refrigeration panels. ' In 1975, they began making overtures to Charles McD

This is an action of trespass to try title, brought by plaintiffs in error against defendant in error, to recover title and possession of one-half interest in block 65, Miller's second addition to the city of Denison, Grayson County, Texas. Defendant in error pleaded not guilty, limitation, and improvements in good faith. The trial court having rendered judgment for defendant in error, and same having been affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, plaintiffs in error have brought the case to th

This is an action to recover a claim for wages. The jury found for plaintiff. A motion for new trial was denied and the appeal is from the judgment. The first question presented is whether the complaint is sufficient. It alleges that plaintiff entered the service of defendant at his instance and request as an oil-well driller on certain described property at the agreed and reasonable compensation of $10 a day; that plaintiff worked for fifty-four days; and that the total value and agre