Cases

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge. This is a suit to enforce a settlement agreement. Andrew Waldrop, the injured plaintiff (hereinafter “Appellant”), was a passenger in a car insured by respondent Shelter Mutual Insurance Company (“Shelter”), which was forced off the road by a vehicle that left the scene. Appellant and Shelter agreed to settle for the policy limits of $25,000. The issue at the heart of the case is whether Shelter

CERTIFIED QUESTION OF LAW FROM THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ¶ 0 The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified four questions under the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 2001 §§ 1601[20-1601], et seq. As reformulated and consolidated, a single question asks: Whether the term "actual cash value" included within

2022 IL 128012 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128012) MONROE SHECKLER et al., Appellees, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Opinion filed November 28, 2022. JUST

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Maxa, A.C.J. ¶1 This case involves the claims of McIntosh Ridge Primary Road Association (McIntosh) against James and Holly Kave for interfering with a trail easement and a community recreation easement on the Kaves’ property that benefitted McIntosh. The Kaves appeal certain summary judgment rulings, the entry of a judgment against them following a jury trial, and the trial court’s

774 S.W.2d 147 (1989) Ervin NOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELTER INSURANCE COMPANIES, Defendant-Respondent. No. 71371. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. August 1, 1989. *148 Donald L. Schlapprizzi, Margaret M. Neill, and Gary A. Growe, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant. Denis C. Burns and Eric P. Rosenkoetter, St. Loui

461 B.R. 200 (2011) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-12229 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. September 13, 2011. *209 Mark D. Collins, Esquire, Chun I. Jang, Esquire, Lee E. Kaufman, Esquire, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Brian S. Rosen, Esquire, Marcia L. Goldstein, Esquire,

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs who suffered dismissals in two separate securities-fraud cases asked the district courts to reinstate their claims under § 27A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa-l(b), which Congress enacted in November 1991. The district courts denied these motions after holding that § 27A(b) violates the Constitution by disturbing final judgmen

569 F.Supp. 310 (1983) SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, and Traders Bank of Kansas City, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT NO. 7 OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., Defendants. No. 81-1352C(A). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. June 17, 1983. *311 Edwin D. Akers, Gregory

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on (1) Plaintiff, Zurich American Insurance Company's Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Doc. 88; ZAIC's Motion), filed on October 6, 2017; and (2) Defendant, Southern-Owners Insurance Company's Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Doc. 94; SOIC's Motion), filed on November 20, 2017. On October 20, 2017, Defendant Southern-Owners Insur

OPINION SHARPNACK, Senior Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Michael Weist appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Kristen Dawn and State Farm Insurance Companies. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 1 ISSUE Weis

358 F.Supp.2d 553 (2005) ROY ANDERSON CORP., et al., Plaintiffs v. TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE CO. and A.D.S., L.L.C., Defendants and Transcontinental Insurance Co. and A.D.S., L.L.C., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, v. Roy Anderson Corp., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:02CV703LG-RHW. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division.

997 F.2d 39 62 USLW 2080, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,664 PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FIRST REPUBLICBANK CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellees.TGX CORP., Plaintiff,v.Gloria Annette Turner SIMMONS, et al., Defendants-AppellantsCross-Appellees,v.GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-AppelleesCross-Appellants.Gaylon D. SIMMONS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appe

Duo-Fast Carolinas, Inc. v. Scott’s Hill Hardware & Supply Co., 2018 NCBC 2. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 16 CVS 9343 DUO-FAST CAROLINAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON PARTIES’ SCOTT’S HILL HARDWARE & SUPPLY CO., INC. and EDWIN MOTIONS FOR

335 Md. 135 (1994) 642 A.2d 219 THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANOR INN OF BETHESDA, INC. ET AL. No. 28, September Term, 1993. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 9, 1994. Jill A. Reid (Donovan, O'Connell & Broderick, all on brief), Silver Spring, for petitioner. John D. Holler, Mt. Rainier, for respondent, Manor Inn of Bethesda

631 N.W.2d 42 (2001) 245 Mich. App. 722 J & J CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTSMEN, LOCAL 1 and Mark King, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 215090. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted December 11, 2000, at Detroit. Decided May 11, 2001, at 9:10 a.m. Released for Publicati

Mr. Justice Brandeis, dissenting. A statute of Missouri, Rev. Stats., 1899, § 7897, prohibited fife insurance companies authorized to do business within the State from forfeiting a policy for default in the payment of premiums, if three full years’ premiums had been paid thereon. The act provided further that in case of such default the policy should be automatically extended and commuted into paid-up term insur

ADAMS, District Judge, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The evidence introduced by both parties, on the issues of waiver, default, and rescission is mainly confined to certain correspondence, which appears in the record, and to certain interviews between L. M. Welch, who was plaintiff’s agent, and Martin Kingman, who was president of the defendant corporation. Welch testifies

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE Mark Torbett appeals the Jackson County Circuit Court’s denial of his motion to compel arbitration and dismiss him for lack of personal jurisdiction. He raises three points on appeal complaining that he should be able to enforce the arbitration agreement as a non-signatory because of *834equitable estoppel and agency theory. The judgment is rev

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-59 No. 457PA20 Filed 6 May 2022 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. KHALIL ABDUL FAROOK On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 274 N.C. App. 65 (2020), reversing an order denying defendant’s motion