Cases

622 S.E.2d 442 (2005) 276 Ga. App. 91 RASHEED et al. v. KLOPP ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. No. A05A1598. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 25, 2005. *443 Eunice A. McMurtry, Maureen M. McLeod, Johnson & Freeman, LLC, Ronald J. Freeman, Atlanta, for Appellants. Charles L. Davis, Jr., Moore, Ingram

190 S.W.3d 633 (2006) JACKSON COUNTY, Missouri, Respondent, v. McCLAIN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al, Defendant Bill House Excavating Co., Appellant. No. WD 66025. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 9, 2006. *635 Jeffrey C. Baker and William P. Denning, Overland Park, KS, for Appellant. Richard E. McLeod, Kansa

147 F.Supp.2d 648 (2001) FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., f/n/a Fluor Daniel, Inc., Plaintiff, v. SOLUTIA INC., Defendant. No. CIV. A. G-01-074. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. May 18, 2001. *649 D. Gibson Walton, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, TX, Richard Lee Melancon, Melancon and Hogue, Anthony G. Buzbee,

104 P.3d 1092 (2004) 136 N.M. 701 2005-NMCA-006 Dora M. ATLER, individually, and as the natural mother, guardian, and next friend of Vanessa Atler, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MURPHY ENTERPRISES, INC., a Nebraska corporation, and Spectacular Attractions, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 23,620. Court of Appeals of New Mexico.<

286 S.C. 501 (1985) 335 S.E.2d 243 STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. Daniel R. McLEOD, Attorney General, Respondent, v. VIP ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a CLOUT, David George, Judy George, Nor Hagy, Sidney Dye, Sherrie Maxedon, Toby Reese, Naida Jones and W.H. McKie, Appellants. 0549 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 20, 1985. Decid

Affirmed in part vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion, Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MURNAGHAN joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge: Minyard Enterprises, Inc. (Minyard) and JB & CR, Inc. (JB & CR) (collectively the Plaintiffs) are the past and present owners, respectively, of a parcel of land (the Property) located

654 F.Supp. 1265 (1987) DANDY OIL, INC., a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. KNIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC., a Michigan corporation, Defendant. No. 86-CV-3984-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. March 6, 1987. *1266 J. Donald McLeod, Dahlberg, Mallender & Gawne, Birmingham, Mich., for plaintiff. Robert E.

MILLER, Presiding Judge. These consolidated cases arise from an automobile accident that injured Karen Powell-Newman. Danny Ayala was driving a truck leased to his employer Yellow Ribbon Tree Experts (‘Yellow Ribbon”) at the time of the accident. Ayala was arrested and charged with various traffic violations. Powell-Newman and her husband Stephen Newman (collectively “the Newman

799 F.Supp.2d 737 (2011) TOYZ, INC., a California limited liability company, Antelope Toyz, LLC, a California limited liability company, Wireless, LCC, a California limited liability company, DEM Associates, Inc., a California corporation, Toyz Rancho Cordova, LLC, a California limited liability company; and Enyart Innovations, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. WIRELESS TOYZ, INC., a Delaware corporation, JSB Enterprises

Justice BEATTY. In this premises liability case involving a third-party criminal act, Ida Lord (“Lord”) appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of D & J Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Cash on the Spot (“D & J”). Lord asserts the circuit court erred in: (1) finding the balancing approach adopted in Bass v. Gopal, Inc., 395 S.C. 129, 716 S.E.2d 910 (2011) (“Gopal II”), which is

669 S.E.2d 211 (2008) LAWSON et al. v. ENTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. No. A08A1053. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 30, 2008. *212 Robert D. Howell, Moultrie, O. Wayne Ellerbee, Valdosta, for appellants. Young, Thagard, Hoffman, Smith & Lawrence, James Bryant Thagard, Valdosta, John H. Smith, Jr., Gainesville, Miller, C

380 F.Supp.2d 1225 (2003) Tom OLSEN, Naomi Olsen, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUALITY CONTINUUM HOSPICE, INC., a New Mexico corporation, Does 1 through 100, inclusive; ABC Corporations I through XX, inclusive; and Black & White Partnership I through XX, inclusive, Defendants. No. CIV02-0875JB/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. February 25, 2004.

585 P.2d 1096 (1978) 92 N.M. 215 MOGUL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-in-Intervention-Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT BUSINESS LOANS, INC., Defendant-in-Intervention-Appellee. No. 11841. Supreme Court of New Mexico. October 27, 1978. *1097 Bruce E. Pasternack, Albuquerque, for appellant. Keleher &

Ray, Judge. Dewey Williams filed a personal injury lawsuit against Fred Jones Enterprises, LLC (“FJE”) and obtained a default judgment *482 against FJE after FJE failed to file any responsive pleadings. FJE filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, which was denied. FJE filed an extraordinar

198 P.3d 354 (2008) 2008-NMCA-153 CAPCO ACQUISUB, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREKA ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and Michael Harton, Linda Harton, Joe Ann Duncan (a/k/a Jo Ann Missey and f/k/a Anderson), Robert Wraldo Duncan IV, Allee Thompson, Betty Baum Cooper, Deborah Thompson (f/k/a Debra Ann Campbell), Tom Ray Gainer (as his sole and separate property), and Lela Renee Thomas (as her sole and separate

744 N.E.2d 459 (2000) Michael B. SMITH and Colonial Mat Company, Inc., Appellant-Defendants, v. McLEOD DISTRIBUTING, INC., Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 41A01-9911-CV-403. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 27, 2000. *460 C. Warren Nerz, McCrosson & Nerz, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Diane E. Bluhm, Morg

2007 NMCA 011 CAPCO ACQUISUB, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREKA ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and MICHAEL HARTON, LINDA HARTON, JOE ANN DUNCAN (a/k/a JOE ANN MISSEY and f/k/a JOE ANN ANDERSON), ROBERT WRALDO DUNCAN, JR., IVALEE THOMPSON, BETTY BAUM COOPER, DEBORAH THOMPSON (f/k/a DEBRA ANN CAMPBELL), TOM RAY GAINER (As His Sole And Separate Property), and LELA RENEE THOMAS (As Her Sole And Separate Property), Plaintiffs-Appellees,

GEE, Circuit Judge: This case presents a new issue for our Court: What effect, if any, did the Copyright Act of 1976 have on the “work for hire” doctrine developed under the 1909 Act? We hold that 1976 Act has greatly restricted the scope of the “work for hire” doctrine, and we affirm the decision of the district court.

MARTIN. CB3 Enterprises, LLC (“CB3 Enterprises”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of Nage Damas (“Damas”) on his counterclaim for indemnification. CB3 Enterprises argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because Da-mas did not, and could not, based on CB3 Enterprises’ governing documents, establish a prima facie </

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 1, 2003 FRANKLIN IRON & METAL RECYCLING, INC. v. WORLEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. I-25915 R.E. Lee Davies, Chancellor No. M2002-02361-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 4, 2003 Defendants appeal the