Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) JENNIFER BRADLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-346 (RBW) ) NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ) ASSOCIATION, et al.,

NO. 4-02-0966 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT ISAAC MONTS, by His Parents and Natural Guardians, ROBERT MONTS and JUDY MONTS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ILLINOI

OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. Presently before the Court are the motions of State National Insurance Company (“State National”) for summary judgment on three issues: (1) the adequacy of the County of Camden’s (“County”) defense and investigation of the underlying Anderson lawsuit [543]; (2) whether the insurance contract entered into between *571

300 F.Supp.2d 119 (2004) Paul JUNG, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-0873 PLF. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 11, 2004. *120 *121 *122

360 F.3d 865 CRAFTSMEN LIMOUSINE, INC., and JMRL Sales & Service, Inc., doing business as Craftsmen Limousine, Appellee,v.FORD MOTOR COMPANY and American Custom Coachworks, Appellants.Craftsmen Limousine, Inc., a Missouri corporation, JMRL Sales & Service, doing business as Craftsmen Limousine, Inc., a Missouri corporation, Appellees;v.Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation; General Motors Corporation, a Missouri cor

363 F.3d 761 CRAFTSMEN LIMOUSINE, INC., and JMRL Sales & Service, Inc., doing business as Craftsmen Limousine, Appellee,v.FORD MOTOR COMPANY and American Custom Coachworks, Appellants.Craftsmen Limousine, Inc., a Missouri corporation, JMRL Sales & Service, doing business as Craftsmen Limousine, Inc., a Missouri corporation, Appellees;v.Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation; General Motors Corporation, a Missouri cor

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Michael McAdoo (“Plaintiff” or “McAdoo”) appeals from a 23 November 2011 order dismissing his amended complaint. Upon de novo review and based upon the record presented, we affirm the trial court’s order on the sole groundthat the dispute does not present a justiciable controversy. This affirmation makes it unnecessary to reach the other issues raised by Plaintiff. I. Jur

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE, DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Dennis Ballinger, Sr., Dennis Ballinger, Jr., Empire, Tax Corp. and Vista Securities, Inc.’s (‘Defendants') Combined Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 9(a) and 12(b)(6) (Doc. 59). Plaintiffs responded (Doc. 92). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASON WOLFORD; ALISON No. 23-16164 WOLFORD; ATOM KASPRZYCKI; HAWAII FIREARMS COALITION, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00265- Plaintiffs-Appellees, LEK-WRP v. OPINION ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii,

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. Wisconsin's Act 1 of 2015, codified at Wis. Stat. § 111.01 et seq., changed many provisions of that State's labor laws. This case deals with a narrow provision of Act 1 that attempts to change the rules for payroll deductions that allow employees to pay union dues through dues-checkoff a

JUSTICE APPLETON delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, Isaac Monts, by his parents and natural guardians, Robert and Judy Monts, appeal the order of the trial court granting defendant’s, Illinois High School Association’s (IHSA), motion for summary judgment. The trial court found that IHSA’s rules and bylaws were

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. This case involves Virginia’s hotly contested “Public-Private” toll lane scheme. Plaintiffs in this case seek class action status, and are all users of the High-Occupancy Toll Roads operated by Defendants in Northern Virginia. This matter is before the Court on three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, filed by (1) Defendants Trans

MEMORANDUM OPINION DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. The Report and Recommendation (ECF # 14), submitted on February 6, 2013, recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF # 5) be granted in part as to Plaintiffs federal claims, and that Plaint

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERARDO GONZALEZ; SIMON Nos. 20-55175 CHINIVIZYAN, 20-55252 Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants, D.C. Nos. 2:12-cv-09012- v. AB-FFM

603 F.Supp.2d 814 (2009) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs v. ARCHSTONE SMITH TRUST, et al., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiffs v. Niles Bolton Assos., Inc., Defendant/Cross-Defendant. Civil Action No. AMD 04-3975. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 18, 2009. *815 Joseph M. Sellers, Matthew Keith Handley, Cohe

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND DISMISS, AND SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs, all foreign nationals, have filed a complaint against a variety of defendants alleging that they were fraudulently induced into investing in rental properties in the City of Detroit with false promises that the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15-1720 KIMBERLY HIVELY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

2005 WY 156 RONALD MUELLER, as an individual and Director of the Star Valley Ranch Association; and WILLIAM L. DALEY, an individual, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. VINCE ZIMMER, an individual; and STEVE CRITTENDEN, an individual, Appellees (Defendants). RONALD MUELLER, as an individual and Director of the Star Valley Ranch Association; and WILLIAM L. DALEY, an individual, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. STAR VALLEY RANCH ASSOCIATION, a Wyomi