⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “McMahon v. Park Funding”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, et al. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25 - 4523 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan LINDA MCMAHON, Secretary of Education, et al. Defendants. MEMORA
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-06-18 · Published · cited 3× · 313 F. Supp. 3d 528
McMahon, C.J. This insurance coverage dispute pivots on the definition of the word "vehicle" as used in an "all risks" policy insuring a luxury cooperative apartment building on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The material facts are simple and undisputed. The gas line running to a line of apartments ruptured shortly after a recycling bin was brought into the basement by the company that runs the New York City e-cy
McMahon v. Fenvespublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-06-25 · Published · cited 2× · 323 F. Supp. 3d 874
LEE YEAKEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court are Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed November 20, 2017 (Dkt. No. 12, Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed December 4, 2017 (Dkt. No. 13, and Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed December 11, 2017 (Dkt. No. 14). Having carefully considered the briefing, applicable law, and the entire case file, the court will grant the motion to dis
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2016-04-12 · Published · cited 8× · 180 F. Supp. 3d 1076; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49299; 2016 WL 1449680
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge If it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, then it’s probably a duck.1 *1081So thought Richard McMahon when he saw the Thunder Beach Motorcycle Rally event being held at Frank Bro
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2011-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 461 B.R. 835
DECISION JOHN A. ROSSMEISSL, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff ABC Sun Control’s “Complaint for Denial of Dischargeability of Debt” [AP# 1], ABC provided custom made awning and window covering materials to American Awning and Shade Inc., a business in which the Defendants Marsha K. McMahon-Jones and Tommy Jones held an interest. In the course of the parties’ dealings the
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024-04-24 · Published · cited 12× · 2024 IL App (1st) 230139
2024 IL App (1st) 230139 No. 1-23-0139 Opinion filed April 24, 2024 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008-07-17 · Published · cited 66× · 951 A.2d 185; 195 N.J. 526; 2008 N.J. LEXIS 877
951 A.2d 185 (2008) 195 N.J. 526 Edward R. McMAHON, Court-Appointed Receiver for One Washington Park Urban Renewal Association and WGL Associates, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWARK, City of Newark Department of Finance, Office of Assessment and Evelyn E. Laccitiello, Tax Assessor, Defendants-Respondents. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 26, 2008. <
McMahon v. McMahonpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991-09-27 · Published · cited 6× · 607 A.2d 696; 256 N.J. Super. 524
256 N.J. Super. 524 (1991) 607 A.2d 696 VERONICA MCMAHON, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN J. MCMAHON, III, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Family Part, Essex County. Decided September 27, 1991. *525 John E. Selser for plaintiff. Tobie G. Meisel for defendant (Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, M
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
SECOND DIVISION April 22, 2003 No. 1-02-0536 MARK A. McMAHON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003-04-22 · Published · cited 34× · 789 N.E.2d 347; 339 Ill. App. 3d 41; 273 Ill. Dec. 447; 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 488
789 N.E.2d 347 (2003) 339 Ill. App.3d 41 273 Ill.Dec. 447 Mark A. McMAHON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-02-0536. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. April 22, 2003. *348 Richard D. Harris, Cameron M. Nelson and Brad
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2009-03-17 · Published · cited 50× · 277 S.W.3d 458; 2009 WL 104779
277 S.W.3d 458 (2009) McMAHON CONTRACTING, L.P., Appellant, v. The CITY OF CARROLLTON, Appellee. No. 05-07-01626-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. January 16, 2009. Rehearing Overruled March 17, 2009. *460 Henry E. Steck, Mark Stoecker, Harrison Steck P.C., Stephen D. Harrison, Harrison & Steck, Hoover &
California Court of Appeal · 2016-08-18 · Published · cited 4× · 2 Cal. App. 5th 734; 207 Cal. Rptr. 3d 73
Opinion MARGULIES, consolidated appeals arise out of a dispute concerning the trust of Armand Borel. The trust states that, upon BoreT s death, a parcel of the trust’s real property is to be distributed to the East Bay Regional Park District (the District) for the purposes of establishing an agricultural park. A p
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018-04-25 · Published · cited 27× · 889 F.3d 1
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of the efforts of the Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation ("MTC") to provide broadband network access in western and north central Massachusetts. An independent public instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MTC entered into two contracts relevant to this appeal. Under one contract, Axia NGNetworks U.S.A., which later ch
McMahon v. McMahonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981-06-17 · Published · cited 5× · 422 N.E.2d 1150; 97 Ill. App. 3d 448; 52 Ill. Dec. 941; 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 2824
97 Ill. App.3d 448 (1981) 422 N.E.2d 1150 ROSE McMAHON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GERALD McMAHON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 80-1573. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed June 17, 1981. *449 Peter Bowyer, of Hanover Park, for appellant. James M. Tourek, of Chicago, for
District Court, D. Delaware · 2000-01-06 · Published · cited 13× · 80 F. Supp. 2d 218; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 440; 2000 WL 84910
80 F.Supp.2d 218 (2000) BELL ATLANTIC-DELAWARE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Robert J. McMAHON, Chairman, et al., Defendants. AT & T Communications of Delaware, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc., et al., Defendants. No. 97-511-SLR, 97-616-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. January 6, 2000. *219
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 844 F. Supp. 2d 843; 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2290; 193 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2351; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22374
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this case are trustees of multi-employer pension plans that have brought suit against a putative employer to collect unpaid fringe benefit contributions. The issue raised in the cross motions for summary
Lentz v. McMahonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 1989-08-17 · Published · cited 63× · 777 P.2d 83; 49 Cal. 3d 393; 261 Cal. Rptr. 310; 1989 Cal. LEXIS 1594
49 Cal.3d 393 (1989) 777 P.2d 83 261 Cal. Rptr. 310 CYNTHIA LENTZ et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. LINDA McMAHON, as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S.F. 25123. Supreme Court of California. August 17, 1989. *396 COUNSEL John K. Van de Kamp,
McMahon v. Lopezpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1988-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 199 Cal. App. 3d 829; 245 Cal. Rptr. 172; 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 241
199 Cal.App.3d 829 (1988) 245 Cal. Rptr. 172 VIVIAN LORENE McMAHON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RALPH LOPEZ et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B025076. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. March 21, 1988. *832 COUNSEL Malley, Scott & Koffman, Rich
Bradshaw v. Parkpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1994-10-27 · Published · cited 14× · 29 Cal. App. 4th 1267; 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 872; 29 Cal. App. 2d 1267; 94 Daily Journal DAR 15211; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8220; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1091
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1269 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1270 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO
Montana Supreme Court · 2003-10-27 · Published · cited 61× · 2003 MT 294; 79 P.3d 250; 318 Mont. 103
79 P.3d 250 (2003) 2003 MT 294 ARROWHEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 75, PARK COUNTY, Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. James A. KLYAP, Jr., Defendant and Appellant. No. 01-332. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs November 29, 2001. Decided October 28, 2003. *253 For Appellant: James