Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Meador v. Gutierrez”
Clearwater Constructors, Inc. v. Gutierrezpublic domain
626 S.W.2d 789 (1981) CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Appellant, v. Irma GUTIERREZ, Appellee. No. 16559. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. July 22, 1981. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1982. *790 H. David Peeples, Joe Meador, San Antonio, for appellant. Warren Weir, San Antonio, for appellee.
Opinion issued May 11, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00188-CV ——————————— IN RE MAURICIO GUTIERREZ AND NRG ENERGY, INC., Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus ***
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-11-00550-CV BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, Appellant v. Carlos M. ZAFFIRINI Sr., Dolores Angelina De la Garza, Clarissa De La Garza, Cristina Lorena Benav
Billings v. United Statespublic domain
322 F.3d 1328 Aaron BILLINGS, Danny M. Brinson, Alejandro Fuentez, Miles Furman, Harry Hathaway, Walter Kittle, Clark Larson, Jose Maruffo, Johnny Meadors, Richard Moody, Eduardo Ramirez, Jesse Shaw, Randy Warrick and Charles Whitmire, John Bates, Bruce Cooke, Gerald Kern, Donald Barley, Alfred Borrego, Ernesto Castillo, Kenneth Moniere, Rolfe Raines, Rowdy D. Adams, Larry G. Arthurs, David Estevis, Manuel Flores, RobertGilbert, William Jumbeck
Billings v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. John W. Lotz, Jorge Gutierrez, and Julian Panek (collectively “appellants”) appeal the dismissal of their complaint seeking overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000). The Court of Federal Claims dismissed the appellants’ complaint following a grant of summary judgment in favor of the government based on a determination that the appellants fell within the executi
United States v. Dinwiddiepublic domain
618 F.3d 821 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Dennis DINWIDDIE, also known as D, Appellant. *822 United States of America, Appellee, v. Michael D. Meador, Appellant. Nos. 09-2154, 09-2649. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 12, 2010. Filed: August 25, 2010. <
Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 20, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00484-CV CHLOE’S CONCEPTS, LLC, ROBERT CONNER AND SARAH CONNER, Appellants V. CLEAR RAINBOW, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court
James Daniel Green v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion issued May 27, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00399-CR ——————————— JAMES DANIEL GREEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
State v. Barozpublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 11:25:43 2017.11.08 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
State v. Barozpublic domain
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: October 5, 2017 4 NO. S-1-SC-34839 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Plaintiff-Appellee, 7 v. 8 BENJAMIN DAVID BAROZ III, 9 Defendant-Appellant. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 11 Jerry H. Ritter, Jr., District Judge 12 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender 13 J. K. Theodosia Johnson, Assistant Appellant Defender 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellant 16 Hector H. Bald
Lewis Wright v. Jean Jones, Individually, and Dorothy Sharkey, as Next Friend and Agent of Jean Marie Wrightpublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-21-00297-CV LEWIS WRIGHT, Appellant v. JEAN JONES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND DOROTHY SHARKEY, AS NEXT FRIEND AND AGENT OF JEAN MARIE WRIGHT, Appellees From the 13th District Court
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-24-00099-CV GUILLERMO ACOSTA and JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the Appellants, §
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-24-00099-CV GUILLERMO ACOSTA and JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the Appellants, §
224 S.W.3d 395 (2006) GAR ASSOCIATES III, L.P., Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Acting by and Through the Texas Department of Transportation, Appellee. No. 01-05-00886-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). November 2, 2006. Rehearing Overruled December 21, 2006. *397 David L.H. Payne, James H. Leeland
Okoro v. Scibanapublic domain
ORDER Ralphael Okoro, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaints filed pursuant to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as well as 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit
Reversed and Rendered and Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00203-CV LINDA MORONEY, Appellant V. ST. JOHN MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., AKA ST. JOHN MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, AS SUCCESSOR AND ASSIGNEE OF ST. JOHN COLORED BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellee On Appeal
BP America Production Co. v. Zaffirinipublic domain
OPINION Opinion by: PATRICIA 0. ALVAREZ, Justice. This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying Appellant’s motions for summary judgment and granting Appel-lees’ motions for summary judgment in a suit involving the construction of an oil and gas lease. Appellant BP America Production Company executed two separate leases to produce oil and gas from the same mineral estate in Web
Collins v. Deeganpublic domain
Richard Collins, a Michigan resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of *572the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Colli
Sharp v. Raineypublic domain
MEMORANDUM COLLIER, District Judge. Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed on 15 May 1995 by Defendant Samuel Rainey, III (Court File No. 10). To date, Plaintiffs have not opposed the motion. For the following reasons, the Court will GRANT the motion to dismiss. I. A Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) A motion to dismiss under
State v. Armijopublic domain
2005-NMCA-010 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER ARMIJO, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 23,775. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. Filing Date: December 3, 2004. Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, Patricia Gandert, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee. Houston Ross, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant. OPINIO